|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
ARS, USDA, U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE 68933
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Carcass Traits Dried Skim Milk Growing-Finishing Pigs Growth Nitrogen Digestibility Urinary Nitrogen Excretion
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The quantity of feed consumed by growing-finishing pigs is many times that eaten by nursery pigs. So, a greater effect on the feed cost and profitability of swine operations would result from using inexpensive dried skim milk to replace soybean meal in growing-finishing diets rather than nursery diets. Nonetheless, dried skim milk is very powdery, and difficulties in feed preparation and animal feeding can be encountered with too much dried skim milk in the diets. Little information is available in the literature on the use of dried skim milk, particularly the proper dietary inclusion rate, for growing-finishing pigs.
This study was conducted to determine effects of dried skim milk as a partial replacement of soybean meal on growth performance, carcass traits, apparent total-tract N digestibility, and N excretion in urine and feces in growing-finishing pigs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (MARC). The pigs used in the experiment were the composite offspring of Duroc, Landrace, and Large White breeds. The experiment consisted of two trials: a feeding trial and a N balance trial.
Feeding Trial.
A total of 180 growing barrows (8 to 11 wk of age; 40.8 ± 2.9 kg BW) was used in two replicates. For each replicate, 90 pigs were stratified by weight into 30 outcome groups. Within each three-pig outcome group, one pig was randomly allotted to Treatment 1, one to Treatment 2, and one to Treatment 3. Adjustments were made to distribute littermates across different treatments. The pigs were housed 10 pigs per pen in an environmentally regulated growing-finishing building. Each pen measured 1.7 x 5.7 m, with a 40% slotted floor, and was equipped with two nipple waterers. Because of the limited slaughtering capacity and the need to slaughter 30 pigs in the same day (10 pigs from each treatment), dietary treatments for Replicates 1 and 2 began 1 and 2 wk, respectively, after pigs were moved into the growing-finishing building. For each replicate, there were three 10-pig pens per dietary treatment. Pigs were fed in a three-phase regimen (growing, growing-finishing, and finishing), and each phase lasted 4 wk. For Treatment 1, pigs were fed a 15.6% CP cornsoybean meal-based diet supplemented with crystalline AA to contain true ileal digestible concentrations of 0.83% lysine, 0.53% threonine, 0.26% methionine, 0.25% cystine, and 0.15% tryptophan during the growing phase. A 13.4% CP diet supplemented with crystalline AA to contain true ileal digestible concentrations of 0.66% lysine, 0.45% threonine, 0.23% methionine, 0.22% cystine, and 0.12% tryptophan was fed during the growing-finishing phase. And an 11.9% CP diet supplemented with crystalline AA to contain true ileal digestible concentrations of 0.52% lysine, 0.40% threonine, 0.22% methionine, 0.20% cystine, and 0.10% tryptophan was fed during the finishing phase. All basal diets were formulated to meet or exceed nutrient requirements recommended by NRC (1998)
. For Treatments 2 and 3, respectively, 5 and 10% (as-fed basis), dried skim milk was added to the basal diet primarily at the expense of soybean meal. The three test diets at each feeding phase were formulated (as-fed basis) to contain the same quantities of DE, CP, true ileal digestible lysine, threonine, tryptophan, and sulfur amino acids (methionine + cystine), Ca, and available P (Table 1
).
|
Pigs were slaughtered at 121.6 ± 9.3 kg BW in six groups of 30 pigs each. Each slaughter group comprised 10 pigs from each dietary treatment. The length on test when pigs were slaughtered ranged from 86 to 98 d. On the day of slaughter, pigs were weighed and their backfat thickness at the 10th rib was obtained ultrasonically (Renco Lean-Meater, Renco Corp., Minneapolis, MN). Pigs were killed by exsanguination after electric stunning. The time of stunning was recorded for each pig. The carcass was skinned, eviscerated, split into two halves, washed, weighed for hot carcass weight, and then kept in a cooling room at 0°C. At 45 min after stun, the pH value of the LM was obtained through the intercostal space at the 10th- and 11th-rib interface, using a Type Argus
Sentron pH meter (Sentron Inc., Gig Harbor, WA). The carcass was chilled at 0°C for 24 to 72 h before being weighed, LM area at the 10th- and 11th-rib interface was traced, and primal cuts were separated. The Boston butt, picnic shoulder, loin, and ham were trimmed to 0.635-cm fat cover and weighed. The trimmed ham was further dissected to measure lean, bone, and fat contents.
Nitrogen Balance Trial. Four pairs of littermate Duroc, Landrace, and Large White composite finishing gilts were used. The gilts were housed in individual 1.2 x 1.2 m pens equipped with nipple waterers to provide water at all times. The room temperature was maintained at 21°C with 24-h lighting. The gilts were trained to enter individual rectangular metabolism cages to consume a basal finishing diet within a 30-min period twice daily (0800 and 1500). The metabolism cage had adjustable sides and back (81 cm tall), and a 46 cm x 122 cm flat expanded metal floor, which was 81 cm above the room floor. Underneath the expanded metal floor were tracks for a full-length screen and a funnel tray. The metabolism cage also had a 46 cm x 122 cm sheet-metal floor, which was 21 cm above the room floor.
The gilts were given a daily feed allowance to provide 2.6x maintenance DE in two equal meals. The daily maintenance DE requirement was equivalent to 110 kcal of DE/kg of BW0.75 (NRC, 1998
). Feed was mixed with water at a ratio of 1 g of feed:1 mL of water at feeding. After gilts had adapted to management, they were weighed 2 h after feeding, and their daily feed allowance was recalculated. The gilts were randomly assigned within a littermate pair to receive the basal finishing diet or the basal finishing diet with 10% (as-fed basis) dried skim milk added. The compositions of the basal finishing diet and the basal finishing diet with 10% dried skim milk added are shown in Table 2
. The day gilts were assigned to treatments was designated as d 0 of the test. The BW of gilts on d 0 was 82.9 ± 2.0 kg.
|
Chemical Analyses
The DM contents of the feed and feces were determined by drying them in a forced-air drying oven (105°C) until they reached a constant weight. This drying method was deemed appropriate because no urine could splash onto feces due to the catheterization of the urinary bladder in the gilts, and collected feces were urine-free. Feed and dried feces were then ground in a Thomas-Wiley mill (model 4, Arthur H. Thomas Co., Philadelphia, PA), subsampled, and analyzed for GE with a Parr adiabatic oxygen bomb calorimeter (model 1241, Parr Instrument Co., Moline, IL) and for N by the combustion method (AOAC, 1990
) with Leco model CN-2000 carbon-nitrogen analyzer (Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI). The urine samples were also analyzed for N and urea N (Marsh et al., 1965
).
Statistical Analyses
Feeding Trial. The data for each 28-d phase and entire 84-d period were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with pen as the experimental unit and using the GLM procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). The model included the effects of block (replication), dietary treatment, and block x treatment (error). Contrasts were used for treatment comparisons, including: 1) basal diet vs. diets containing dried skim milk (i.e., Treatment 1 vs. Treatments 2 and 3); and 2) 5% vs. 10% dried skim milk diets (i.e., Treatment 2 vs. Treatment 3).
Nitrogen Balance Trial. The data were analyzed as a randomized complete block design with individual pigs as the experimental unit and using the GLM procedure of SAS. The model included the effects of block (replication), dietary treatment, and block x treatment (error).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pig performance during intermediate phases was generally consistent with the overall trial result; therefore only data for the entire 84-d period are presented (Table 3
). There were no differences between pigs fed the basal diet and the dried skim milk-supplemented diets in the initial (P = 0.80) and final (P = 0.81) BW. Also, no differences were detected between pigs fed the 5 and 10% dried skim milk diets in initial (P = 0.73) and final (P = 0.80) BW. Average daily gain did not differ between pigs fed the basal diets and the dried skim milk-supplemented diets (P = 0.84). No differences in ADG were found (P = 0.71) between pigs fed the 5 and 10% dried skim milk diets. The ADFI did not differ between pigs fed the basal diets and the dried skim milk-supplemented diets (P = 0.54), and no differences were found in ADFI between pigs fed the 5 and 10% dried skim milk diets (P = 0.91). There were also no differences in G:F between pigs fed the basal diets and the dried skim milk diets (P = 0.80), and no differences in G:F were detected between pigs fed the 5 and 10% dried skim milk diets (P = 0.97).
|
|
No shedding of microbial pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7, was found in fecal samples obtained by rectal massage from pigs fed the basal diets, and diets containing 10% dried skim milk (data not shown). In addition, no differences were found among the three dietary treatments in the emissions of volatile odor compounds, including short- and branched-chain VFA (C2 through C6), alcohols (C2 through C4), and aromatic ring-containing compounds (principally phenol and cresol), from fresh feces, aged feces, and manure slurry obtained (data not shown).
Nitrogen Balance Trial
As showed in Table 5
, the ADG, ADFI, and G:F over the 8-d period for feces and urine collection did not differ between gilts fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet (P = 0.70, P = 0.07, and P = 0.61, respectively). The daily N intake for pigs fed the basal diet did not differ from those fed the 10% dried skim milk diet (P = 0.33). There were also no differences between pigs fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet in daily urine output (P = 0.58), urine urea concentration (P = 0.73), daily urine urea output (P = 0.88), urine urea N concentration (P = 0.73), daily urine urea N output (P = 0.88), urine N concentration (P = 0.64), and daily urine N output (P = 0.97). Between pigs fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet, no differences were found in daily fresh feces output (P = 0.57), fecal DM content (P = 0.99), daily fecal DM output (P = 0.49), fecal N concentration (DM basis; P = 0.07), daily fecal N output (P = 0.69), and daily total manure output (P = 0.62). No differences between pigs fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet were detected in daily N digested (P = 0.52), apparent total-tract N digestibility coefficient (P = 0.84), daily N retention (P = 0.73), and apparent N retention coefficient (P = 0.84).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The phenomenon whereby drying feces in a forced-air oven at temperatures over 70°C causes losses of volatile compounds such as N-containing volatile urinary urea (Adeola, 2001
) exists only with feces contaminated with urine. However, feces of the current study were collected without any urine contamination because of catheterization of the urinary bladder in the gilts. Therefore, no loss of N from the urine-free feces would occur in the current study when the feces were dried at 105°C in a forced-air drying oven. The N values reported for the N balance trial of the current study should reflect true and accurate results. For finishing gilts fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet in the N balance trial of the current study, the values of apparent total tract N digestibility did not differ and amounted to 86.9 and 86.5% of N intake, respectively. These values are close to the 87.8% value reported by Hansen and Lewis (1993)
for finishing gilts fed cornsoybean meal diets. The apparent N retention values for finishing gilts fed the basal diet and the 10% dried skim milk diet in the current study were, respectively, 41.9 and 43.0% of N intake, with no treatment difference. These N retention values are within the 30 to 55% range normally observed in pigs fed commercial feedstuffs (Kornegay and Harper, 1997
; NRC, 1998
). The similar apparent total-tract N digestibility and apparent N retention for finishing gilts fed the basal diet and those fed the 10% dried skim milk diet in the current study indicates no negative effect on N excretion from dietary inclusion of 10% dried skim milk would occur in pig operations. These results from the N balance trial support the feeding trial on dietary suitability of dried skim milk for growing-finishing pigs.
In addition to nutrient excretion, ammonia release and odor production are also major challenges facing the swine industry (Kerr, 2003
; Yen, 2003
). Ammonia is released from the rapid hydrolysis of urinary urea by fecal urease (Stevens et al., 1989
). Thus, the quantity of ammonia release is directly associated with urinary urea output by pigs. In the current study, daily urinary urea output did not differ between gilts fed the basal diet and those given the 10% dried skim milk diet (45.0 and 45.6 g/d, respectively). Although no determination of ammonia release was made in the current study, the almost identical daily urinary urea output for the two dietary treatments would suggest no negative effect on ammonia release from feeding the 10% dried skim milk diet in finishing gilts. In the feeding trial of the current study, determinations were conducted on the emission of volatile odor compounds from fresh feces, aged feces, and manure slurry on d 0, 28, 56, and 84 of the trial. Volatile odor compounds measured were primarily short- and branched-chain VFA (C2 through C6), alcohols (C2 through C4), and aromatic ring-containing compounds (principally phenol and cresol) similar to the volatile odor compounds observed in the headspace of swine manure slurries by Zhan et al. (1997)
. Our unpublished observations showed no difference in the emission of volatile odor compounds was found among the three dietary treatments. This further strengthens our contention that feeding 5 or 10% dried skim milk would not jeopardize environment as compared with typical corn-soybean meal diets.
There is an increasing concern in the general public about the food safety relating to gut microbial shedding. Dried skim milk contains 50% lactose on DM basis (Mahan, 2003
). The inclusion of 5 or 10% dried skim milk in the current study increased lactose content in the diets. Lactose may alter gastrointestinal microbial function via shifts in microbial populations, specifically species of E. coli and Lactobacillus (Szilagyi, 2002
). Certain Lactobacillus spp. have been shown to decrease shedding of E. coli O157:H7 in cattle (Brashears et al., 2003
). In the feeding trial of the current study, the shedding of microbial pathogens was determined in fecal sample obtained by rectal massage. Our unpublished observations indicated that E. coli O157:H7 was not found in pigs fed the basal diets, and dietary inclusion of 10% dried skim milk did not result in shedding. These findings illustrate that inclusion of dried skim milk in growing-finishing diets would not likely cause unwanted effects on gut microbiota in pigs and the safety of pork.
Taken together, data from the current study indicate that up to 10% of dried skim milk can be used to partially replace soybean meal in diets for growing-finishing pigs. However, the price of dried skim milk will determine the feasibility of dietary inclusion of dried skim milk in growing-finishing diets. Dried skim milk can be released at lower prices by the U.S. government to assist pork producers suffering economic hardship created by drought or other conditions.
| Footnotes |
|---|
SENTRON pH meter; and J. K. Byrkit for secretarial assistance.
2 Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA. ![]()
3 Correspondence: P.O. Box 166 (phone: 402-762-4206; fax: 402-762-4209; e-mail: jtyen{at}email.marc.usda.gov).
Received for publication April 29, 2004. Accepted for publication July 15, 2004.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |