|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |

* Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193-Bellaterra, Spain; and
and
Centre for Animal Sciences, School of Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, U.K.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Ruminal Fermentation Plant Extract Protein Degradation
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of several natural plant extracts on VFA concentrations and protein degradation in a dual-flow continuous culture system.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Eight 1,320-mL dual flow continuous culture fermenters (Hoover et al., 1976
) were used in four consecutive10-d periods. On the first day of each period, all fermenters were inoculated with ruminal fluid obtained from two ruminal fistulated dairy cows fed a total mixed diet (35.7% alfalfa hay, 7.6% ryegrass hay, 15.5% ground corn, 11.6% barley grain, 11.9% corn gluten feed, 8.1% cottonseed, 4.6% molasses, 1.6% soybean meal, 1.3% calcium soaps of fatty acids, and 2.1% mineral and vitamin mixture, DM basis). During the 10 d of each period, all fermenters were fed 95 g of DM/d of the diet (18.9% CP; 36.6% NDF; 17.6% ADF; DM basis) in three feedings per day (0800, 1600, and 2400). The diet was ground to pass a 1.5-mm screen (Hammer mill, P. Prat SA, Sabadell, Spain), and consisted (DM basis) of alfalfa hay (27%), dehydrated whole corn plant (20%), barley straw (5%), soybean meal (16%), ground corn grain (15%), ground barley grain (15%), and a vitamin and mineral mixture (2%; 1 kg DM of vitamin and mineral mixture contained 1,000,000 IU of vitamin A; 200,000 IU of vitamin D; 1,333 mg of vitamin E; 300 g of magnesium oxide; 67 g of sodium chloride; 33 g of sulfur; 2.7 mg of manganese sulfate; 7 mg of cobalt sulfate; 167 mg of copper sulfate; 2.7 g of zinc methionate; 2 g of zinc sulfate; 33 mg of iodine; 27 mg of selenium; and 267 g of urea). The diet was designed to meet or exceed nutrient recommendations for a Holstein cow (600 kg) producing 25 kg of milk (NRC, 2001
). Temperature (38.5°C), pH (6.4 ± 0.05), and liquid (10%/h) and solid (5%/h) dilution rates were kept constant in the fermenters. Fermentation parameters were monitored and controlled by a computer and a programmable linear controller (National Instruments, Austin, TX), and fermentation conditions were programmed with LabView Software (National Instruments). Anaerobic conditions were maintained by infusion of N2 at a rate of 40 mL/min. Artificial saliva (Weller and Pilgrim, 1974
) containing 0.4 g/L of urea to simulate recycled N was continuously infused into flasks at rate of 2.2 mL/min. Treatments were assigned to fermenters at random within periods, and were 1) no extract (CTR), 2) a mixture of equal proportions (vol/vol) of all extracts (MIX), and 3) extracts of garlic (Allium sativa, GAR; 0.7% of allicin), cinnamon (Cinnamonum cassia, CIN; 59% of cinnamaldehyde), yucca (Yucca schidigera, YUC; 8% of sarsaponin), anise (Pimpinella anisum, ANI; 86% of anethole), oregano (Origanum vulgare, ORE; 64% of carvacrol and 16% of thymol), and pepper (Capsicum annuum, PEP; 12% of capsaicin). Raw materials were provided by AXISS France SAS (AXISS France SAS, Archamps, France). The levels of inclusion were 15 mg/kg DM for the MIX and 7.5 mg/kg DM for each of the individual extracts. Under the experimental conditions defined in this work, 7.5 mg/kg was equivalent to 0.71 mg of extract/d or 0.22 mg/L of ruminal fluid. The lipid-soluble extracts (all except YUC) were dissolved in sunflower oil at a 1:250 dilution. Yucca was dissolved in water at the same proportion. All extracts were stored at 5°C in 200-mL smoked glass bottles. One-third of the daily dose of extracts was dosed into the fermenters 1 min before each feeding. The CTR and YUC treatments were also dosed with the equivalent amount of sunflower oil.
Each experimental period consisted of 10 d (8 d for adaptation and 2 d for sample collection). On the adaptation days, 8 mL of fermenter fluid was taken 2 h after the morning feeding to determine the effects of natural plant extracts on ruminal ammonia N and VFA concentrations. During the last 2 d of the experiment, 4 mL of fermenter fluid were taken 2 h after the morning feeding to determine VFA concentrations. Samples (36 mL in each sampling time) were also taken at 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 h after the morning feeding to determine tungstic acid soluble N (TA N), trichloroacetic acid soluble N (TCA N), and ammonia N. Results were used to calculate peptide, AA, and ammonia N concentrations in fermenters.
Chemical Analyses
Samples for VFA were prepared as described by Jouany (1982)
. One milliliter of a solution comprising a 0.2% (wt/wt) solution of mercuric chloride, 0.2% (wt/wt) of 4-methylvaleric acid as an internal standard, and 2% (vol/vol) orthophosphoric acid was added to 4 mL of ruminal fluid and frozen. Samples were centrifuged at 3,000 x g for 30 min, and the supernatant fluid was analyzed by gas chromatography (model 6890, Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA) using a polyethylene glycol nitroterephthalic acid-treated capillary column (BP21, SGE Europe Ltd., Kiln Farm Milton Keynes, U.K.) at 275°C in the injector and a 29.9 mL/min gas flow rate.
For ammonia N determination, a 4-mL sample of fermenter fluid was acidified with 4 mL of 0.2 N HCl and frozen. Samples were centrifuged at 25,000 x g for 20 min, and the supernatant was analyzed by spectrophotometry (UV-120-01, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) for ammonia N (Chaney and Marbach, 1962
).
Peptide and AA N were determined as described by Winter et al. (1964)
. A 16-mL sample of fermenter fluid was added to 4 mL of 10% (wt/vol) sodium tungstate and 4 mL of 1.07 N sulfuric acid. After allowing the tubes to stand at 5°C for 4 h, they were centrifuged at 9,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was frozen until analyzed for TA N by the Kjeldahl procedure (AOAC, 1990
). To determine TCA N, 4 mL of 50% (wt/vol) TCA was added to 16 mL of fermenter fluid. After 4 h at 5°C, tubes were centrifuged at 9,000 x g for 15 min. The supernatant was frozen until analyzed for TCA N. Results were used to calculate in mg/100 mL: 1) Peptide N = (TCA N) (TA N); and b) AA N = (TA N) (ammonia N).
Statistical Analyses
All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC, version 8.1). Results were analyzed using PROC MIXED for repeated measures (Littell et al., 1998
). The model accounted for the effects of treatments and days (for VFA and ammonia N concentration in d 1 to 10), or treatment and hours of sampling (for the protein fractions in d 9 and 10), and the interaction of treatment with day or treatment with hours. The period was considered a random effect. The statistical analyses of results of VFA and ammonia N concentrations day by day, and protein fractions hour by hour, was performed using the compound symmetric covariance structure that yielded the largest Schwarzs Bayesian criterion. Orthogonal contrasts were used to compare 1) treatment means vs. CTR, 2) each day vs. previous day for VFA and ammonia N concentration during the adaptation days, and 3) hour after feeding vs. 0 h (for the protein fractions in d 9 and 10). Differences were declared at P < 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Effect during the Adaptation Period
Total VFA concentrations decreased (P < 0.05) in all treatments from d 1 to 2 (Table 1
), and in all treatments except GAR and ORE in d 3, remaining constant thereafter (Table 1
). There were no treatment effects on total VFA concentrations. Changes in total VFA concentration with time in continuous culture system in experiments conducted in our laboratory (unpublished observations) indicated that this reduction is normal, probably due to the adaptation of ruminal microorganisms to in vitro fermentation conditions. Results suggest that 3 d was sufficient for the adaptation of the ruminal flora to the fermentation conditions in vitro. The molar proportion (mol/100 mol) of acetate (Table 1
) was higher (P < 0.05) in CIN, GAR, ANI, and ORE on d 2 to 6 compared with CTR. These differences disappeared after 6 d of fermentation. The molar proportion (mol/100 mol) of propionate (Table 1
) was lower (P < 0.05) in CIN and GAR from d 2 to 4, and in ANI and ORE from d 2 to 5 compared with CTR; however, all of these differences disappeared after 6 d of fermentation. The molar proportion (mol/100 mol) of butyrate (data not shown) was lower (P < 0.05) in CIN, GAR, ANI, and ORE (average of 11.4 ± 0.93, 10.6 ± 0.86, 11.3 ± 0.75, and 10.5 ± 0.88, respectively) from d 2 to 4 compared with CTR (average of 14.8 ± 0.75), but these differences also disappeared after 4 d of fermentation. The acetate:propionate ratio (data not shown) was higher (P < 0.05) in CIN (average of 2.4 ± 0.13), GAR (average of 2.2 ± 0.17), ANI (average of 2.4 ± 0.12), and ORE (average of 2.1 ± 0.11) from d 2 to 4 compared with CTR (average of 1.6 ± 0.17). After d 5, the acetate:propionate ratio was similar among treatments. Treatments had no effect on the proportions of isobutyrate, isovalerate, and valerate during the 8 d of adaptation.
|
Effects after the Adaptation Period
Total VFA concentration was similar in all treatments (average of 109.4 ± 4.8 mM; Table 2
). The proportion of each individual VFA was not affected by treatments except for the valerate proportion, which was lower (P < 0.05) in PEP compared with CTR.
|
|
The ammonia N concentration in CTR was lower (P < 0.05) at 4 and 6 h after feeding, and returned to prefeeding levels thereafter (Table 3
). Similar pattern was observed in all treatments. At time of feeding (0 h), the ammonia N concentration in ANI was higher (P < 0.05), and in GAR was lower (P < 0.05) compared with CTR. The ammonia N concentration was higher (P < 0.05) at 2, 4 and 6 h after feeding in ANI, and at 4 h after feeding in ORE, and lower (P < 0.05) at 2 h after feeding in YUC, compared with CTR. The average ammonia N concentration throughout the 8-h feeding interval was higher (P < 0.05) in ANI, and lower (P < 0.05) in GAR compared with CTR (Table 3
).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The proportions of individual VFA were not affected by treatments compared with CTR, except for valerate proportion in PEP. The effects of YUC on individual VFA proportions are contradictory. Although the lack of effect observed in the present trial agrees with some in vivo (Wu et al., 1994
) and in vitro (Wang et al., 1997
) reports, others (Grobner et al., 1982
and Ryan et al., 1997
, in vitro; Hristov et al., 1999
, in vivo) found that YUC modified the acetate and/or propionate proportions. However, it is noteworthy that during the adaptation period, CIN, GAR, ANI, and ORE affected the molar proportions of acetate, propionate, and butyrate between d 2 to 6 of fermentation, although all these difference disappeared after d 6. These results suggest that, although these additives had a short-term effect on ruminal microbial fermentation, ruminal microbes were adapted after 6 d. Evans and Martin (2000)
reported that thymol (400 mg/L), a secondary compound of ORE, modified the acetate and propionate molar proportions in mixed ruminal microorganisms in in vitro 24-h incubations. In the present trial, the addition of ORE also affected the molar proportions of acetate and propionate after 24 h of fermentation, but differences disappeared after 6 and 5 d of fermentation, respectively. These results indicate that, at the doses used, ruminal microbes built up a tolerance to these additives, and suggest that results from short-term fermentation studies should be interpreted with caution. Although similar changes were observed for CIN, GAR, and ANI, there are no other reports available on the effect of these additives on individual proportion of VFA in the rumen. In the dual-flow continuous culture, an adaptation period of 6 d seemed to be sufficient to test the long-term effects of this type of products on ruminal microbial fermentation.
The concentrations of the different N fractions in the CTR after feeding provide evidence of the dynamics of N use by ruminal microbes. The decrease in peptide N concentration after feeding agrees with in vivo results (Hristov et al., 1999
), but other in vivo studies (Chen et al., 1987
; Broderick and Wallace, 1988
) indicated that peptide N concentration increases after feeding as a result of protein degradation. The inconsistencies among reports may be attributed to differences in the rate of protein degradation, the rate of peptide use by ruminal microbes, which is dependent on energy availability, and the rate of peptide N passage to the lower tract. The increase in the AA N concentrations during the 2 h after feeding may be attributed to a high rate of peptide degradation or a low rate of AA N use by ruminal microbes. The ammonia N concentration in CTR in the current study decreased in the 4 h after feeding, and returned to prefeeding levels after 8 h. In vivo, ruminal ammonia N concentration after feeding may increase (Hristov et al., 1999
) or decrease (Devant et al., 2000
) depending on the amount of degradable protein and on the amount and type of dietary carbohydrates available for microbial use (Russell et al., 1983
).
There is limited information on the effect of natural plant extracts on peptide metabolism in the rumen. The addition of 7.5 mg/kg DM of YUC extract (containing 8% of sarsaponin) in the present trial increased the average peptide N concentration by 26.2% throughout the 8-h feeding interval. This result suggests that proteolysis was stimulated or peptidolysis was inhibited. In contrast, Hristov et al. (1999)
supplemented heifers with 1,961 and 5,825 mg/kg of YUC (containing 4.4% of sarsaponin) and found no effect on peptide N concentration during the 6 h after feeding. The lack of agreement may be attributed to the approach used (in vivo vs. in vitro), the doses used, or the level of forage in the diet. In the present trial, YUC did not affect the AA N concentration and only decreased the ammonia N concentration 2 h after feeding without affecting the overall average between feeding. Previous studies have found inconsistent effects of YUC on ammonia N concentrations over a wide range of levels of inclusion in the diet. Ryan et al. (1997)
reported that the addition of 6,250 mg/kg of YUC decreased the ammonia N concentration from 17.0 to 15.6 mmol/L after 48 h in in vitro incubation. Grobner et al. (1982)
found a 15% decrease (P < 0.08) in ammonia N after 7 d of continuous culture fermentation trial when 60 mg/kg of pure sarsaponin (secondary compound of YUC) were added to the fermenters. Wallace et al. (1994)
also found a 6% reduction (P < 0.05) in ammonia N in an in vitro incubation with strained ruminal fluid containing 10 mg/L of YUC. In contrast, other in vivo (Wu et al., 1994
, level of inclusion 400 mg/kg of YUC; Hristov et al., 1999
, level of inclusion 5,825 mg/kg of YUC) and in vitro (Wang et al., 1997
; level of inclusion 44,000 mg/kg of YUC) studies found no effects of YUC extract on ammonia N concentration. Our results suggest that YUC extract may affect protein or peptide degradation more than deamination. However, it is relevant that the level of inclusion of YUC used in the present trial (7.5 mg/kg DM of YUC containing 8% of sarsaponin) was lower than the levels of inclusion tested in previous reports, which may explain the lack of effect of YUC on ammonia N concentration in ruminal fluid. The addition of 7.5 mg/kg DM of CIN (containing 59% of cinnamaldehyde) increased peptide N concentration by 102.5% 2 h after feeding, increased the average peptide N concentration by 26.2%, and numerically decreased the average AA N concentration by 12.5% throughout the 8-h feeding interval. These results suggest that CIN extract stimulated proteolysis or inhibited peptidolysis. The addition of 7.5 mg/kg DM of GAR (containing 0.7% of allicin) increased the peptide N concentration by 102.5% 2 h after feeding, and increased numerically the average peptide N concentration by 23%, suggesting that GAR extract stimulated proteolysis or inhibited peptidolysis. In addition, the 33% increase in the AA N concentration 4 h after feeding, the 17% increase in the average AA N, and the 25.5% decrease in the average ammonia N concentration throughout the 8-h feeding interval suggest that GAR extract inhibited deamination. The addition of 7.5 mg/kg DM of ANI (containing 86% of anethole) increased the peptide N concentration by 79% 2 h after feeding, but did not affect the average peptide N concentration throughout the 8 h feeding interval. The higher average concentration of AA N, the higher ammonia N concentration at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after feeding, and the higher average ammonia N concentration throughout the 8-h feeding intervals, suggests that ANI extract stimulated peptidolysis and deamination. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the effects of CIN, GAR, and ANI extracts on peptide, AA, or ammonia N degradation in ruminal microbial fermentation. The accumulation of peptides and AA in ruminal fluid may stimulate microbial protein synthesis or improve the flow of AA to the small intestine (Griswold et al., 1996
). The effects of ORE, PEP, or MIX on N metabolism were small and inconsistent.
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
2 Correspondence: Facultat de Veterinaria, Edifici V (phone: +34-93-581-1495; fax: +34-93-581-1494; e-mail: sergio.calsamiglia{at}uab.es).
Received for publication January 23, 2004. Accepted for publication August 4, 2004.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Fuentes, S. Calsamiglia, P. W. Cardozo, and B. Vlaeminck Effect of pH and level of concentrate in the diet on the production of biohydrogenation intermediates in a dual-flow continuous culture J Dairy Sci, September 1, 2009; 92(9): 4456 - 4466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Benchaar and P. Y. Chouinard Short communication: Assessment of the potential of cinnamaldehyde, condensed tannins, and saponins to modify milk fatty acid composition of dairy cows J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2009; 92(7): 3392 - 3396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Holtshausen, A. V. Chaves, K. A. Beauchemin, S. M. McGinn, T. A. McAllister, N. E. Odongo, P. R. Cheeke, and C. Benchaar Feeding saponin-containing Yucca schidigera and Quillaja saponaria to decrease enteric methane production in dairy cows J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2009; 92(6): 2809 - 2821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Benchaar, T. A. McAllister, and P. Y. Chouinard Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, Ciliate Protozoal Populations, and Milk Production from Dairy Cows Fed Cinnamaldehyde, Quebracho Condensed Tannin, or Yucca schidigera Saponin Extracts J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4765 - 4777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Calsamiglia, M. Busquet, P. W. Cardozo, L. Castillejos, and A. Ferret Invited Review: Essential Oils as Modifiers of Rumen Microbial Fermentation J Dairy Sci, June 1, 2007; 90(6): 2580 - 2595. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Fraser, A. V. Chaves, Y. Wang, T. A. McAllister, K. A. Beauchemin, and C. Benchaar Assessment of the Effects of Cinnamon Leaf Oil on Rumen Microbial Fermentation Using Two Continuous Culture Systems J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2007; 90(5): 2315 - 2328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Benchaar, H. V. Petit, R. Berthiaume, D. R. Ouellet, J. Chiquette, and P. Y. Chouinard Effects of Essential Oils on Digestion, Ruminal Fermentation, Rumen Microbial Populations, Milk Production, and Milk Composition in Dairy Cows Fed Alfalfa Silage or Corn Silage J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2007; 90(2): 886 - 897. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Benchaar, H. V. Petit, R. Berthiaume, T. D. Whyte, and P. Y. Chouinard Effects of addition of essential oils and monensin premix on digestion, ruminal fermentation, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2006; 89(11): 4352 - 4364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Cardozo, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel Effects of alfalfa extract, anise, capsicum, and a mixture of cinnamaldehyde and eugenol on ruminal fermentation and protein degradation in beef heifers fed a high-concentrate diet J Anim Sci, October 1, 2006; 84(10): 2801 - 2808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Castillejos, S. Calsamiglia, and A. Ferret Effect of essential oil active compounds on rumen microbial fermentation and nutrient flow in in vitro systems. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2649 - 2658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Busquet, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel Plant Extracts Affect In Vitro Rumen Microbial Fermentation J Dairy Sci, February 1, 2006; 89(2): 761 - 771. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. H. Varel, D. N. Miller, and E. D. Berry Incorporation of thymol into corncob granules for reduction of odor and pathogens in feedlot cattle waste J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 481 - 487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. W. Cardozo, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, and C. Kamel Screening for the effects of natural plant extracts at different pH on in vitro rumen microbial fermentation of a high-concentrate diet for beef cattle J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2572 - 2579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Busquet, S. Calsamiglia, A. Ferret, P. W. Cardozo, and C. Kamel Effects of Cinnamaldehyde and Garlic Oil on Rumen Microbial Fermentation in a Dual Flow Continuous Culture J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2005; 88(7): 2508 - 2516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bach, S. Calsamiglia, and M. D. Stern Nitrogen Metabolism in the Rumen J Dairy Sci, May 1, 2005; 88(e_suppl_1): E9 - E21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |