J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovatto, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvant, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovatto, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvant, D.
J. Anim. Sci. 2003. 81:683-696
© 2003 American Society of Animal Science

Modeling homeorhetic and homeostatic controls of pig growth1

P. A. Lovatto*,{dagger} and D. Sauvant*,2

* UMR INRA-INAPG Physiologie de la Nutrition et Alimentation 75231, Paris, France and and {dagger} Universidade Federal de Santa Maria/Bolsista CNPq, Santa Maria, RS 97119-900 Brazil

2 Correspondence:
Département des Sciences Animales, 16, rue Claude Bernard (phone: (33) 1 44 08 17 55; fax: (33) 1 44 08 18 53; E-mail:
sauvant{at}inapg.inra.fr).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
A dynamic mechanistic model of homeorhetic and homeostatic controls of pig growth was developed. The homeorhetic principles were based on changes in time of fractional rates of anabolism and catabolism of tissues. A minimum number of homeostatic principles integrated current data on plasma kinetics and the partitioning of nutrients between anabolism and catabolism of body tissues, and endogenous losses with integument and into the gut. The major features of the model are two levels of organization (tissue and plasma) and three body tissues (carcass proteins, visceral proteins, and body lipids). The protein tissues and plasma amino acids were subdivided into lysine, methionine and cystine, threonine, tryptophan, other essential AA, and nonessential AA compartments. Plasma glucose and fatty acids were also considered. Adenosine triphosphate and adenosine diphosphate were used to represent energy transformations, although these energy transformations were not included in the homeostatic control of pig growth. The mass variations within each of the 23 basic compartments were described with a specific deterministic, dynamic differential equation. The simulated metabolic rates of the protein and lipid tissues were similar to published data. The principal outputs from the model (protein and lipid gain, body weight, chemical body constituents, plasma parameters) showed that the proposed homeorhetic and homeostatic controls provide a mechanistic approach to modeling growth.

Key Words: Growth • Homeostasis • Models • Pigs


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
During the last decades, animal growth has been investigated at both cellular and molecular levels and has increased our knowledge of the underlying mechanisms of growth. However, the integration of these mechanisms into metabolic models of pig growth has remained a challenge (Emmans and Kyriazakis, 1997). One of the major limitations to progress has been the difficulty in representing the systems which control nutrients flows within a model. The concept of "multiple responses to the diet" (Sauvant, 1992), which integrates the roles of both homeorhesis and homeostasis, appeared to be an adequate theoretical concept with which to model metabolism. Homeorhesis is a long-term control that expresses the genetic make-up of the animal and(or) the animal’s potential. Homeostasis is a short-term control representing the mechanisms that enable the animal to function under a range of environmental conditions. The integration of both homeorhetic and homeostatic controls of protein and body lipid turnover into a mathematical model allows for a more mechanistic representation of nutrient partitioning. This concept was used previously in a simple model of the control of amino acid metabolism in pig growth (Lovatto and Sauvant, 1999). The current paper aims to expand this concept by representing more specifically homeorhetic and some essential homeostatic controls into a mechanistic and dynamic model of pig growth.

Description of the Model
The model used a compartmental structure (Figure 1Go) with organization both at the tissue and molecular level. Eighteen state variables were linked with protein metabolism: lysine, methionine and cystine, threonine, tryptophan, other essential amino acids (EAA) and nonessential amino acids (NEA) in carcass proteins, visceral proteins, and plasma. Body proteins were assumed to be the sum of AA state variables in both carcass and visceral protein tissues. Three other state variables were associated with lipid metabolism: glucose and fatty acids (FA) only represented in plasma, and body lipids (BLI) at a tissue level. As proposed in the sow model of Pettigrew et al. (1992), the FA pool comprised both nonesterified and esterified FA. Two other state variables were used to represent energy transfer within in the model: ATP and ADP. Mass balances for each state variable and the mass transfer between them are represented using specific deterministic dynamic differential equations. The basic structure of these equations is shown in Table 1Go and Appendix 1Go.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Diagram of the model. Body tissues (BT, proteins, BP; lipids, BLI), and plasma (Pa). The protein tissues are divided into carcass (ca) and viscera (vi). Biochemical subcompartments: lysine (LYS); methionine + cystine (MEC), threonine (THR), tryptophan (TRY), other essential amino acids (EAA), nonessential amino acids (NEA), glucose (Gl), nonesterified fatty acids (FA), ATP, and ADP. The end flows: endogenous digestive losses (En), integument (In), urea (UR), and respiratory chain (CO2, H2O). Solid lines show the material flows and broken lines the energy flows.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Notation used in the equations
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Appendix 1. Mathematical statement of the model
 
Modeling Controls
Homeorhetic Control.
The major assumptions concerning homeorhetic controls in the model were based on principles proposed for pregnant and lactating ruminants (Bauman and Currie, 1980) and growing pigs (Danfaer, 1991). The representation of these controls assumed that growth was the difference between anabolic and catabolic flows, as was suggested in the general growth model of von Berthalanffy (1973). The nutrients flows were assumed to be proportional to the size of the respective compartments (i.e., proteins or lipids):


where BT = body tissue, Aks,BT = fractional rate of anabolism for BT tissue, Cks,BT = fractional rate of catabolism for BT tissue, and dt = time step.

As proposed by Danfaer (1991), the fractional rates of anabolism and catabolism of tissues followed exponential decays with time. For example, for anabolism, the basic expression was:


where Aks,BT = fractional rate of anabolism for BT tissue, ksb,BT = fractional rate of anabolism for BT tissue in the adult, Ai,BT = difference in the fractional rate of anabolism for BT tissue between the initial state (t = 0) and the adult, Ae,BT = fractional rate of change in the fractional rate for anabolism of BT tissue per unit time, and t = time.

The same equations were used to represent catabolism, where A values were replaced by the corresponding C values. Thus, the Aks,BT and Cks,BT decrease from an initial value toward a common value ksb,BT, for adults, according to a first-order process. In growing animals, values for Aks,BT have to be greater than those for Cks,BT. The numerical integration of these differential equations determined the anabolic and catabolic flows, protein gain (PG), lipid gain (LG) and corresponding ADG. These values were taken into account to calculate the "homeorhetic" requirements for maintenance and tissue gains. Empty body weight (eBW) was assumed to be the sum of main chemical constituents: proteins, lipids, water, and ash. Body water was calculated from body proteins as suggested Moughan et al. (1987):


Body ash was assumed to be 20% of body protein, as proposed by Karege (1991). Body weight was assumed to be the sum of eBW and gut content, and the latter was estimated as 5% of eBW (Whittemore, 1983). The ADG was obtained by differences in BW between simulation steps of 1 day.

Homeostatic Control.
Homeostatic controls were applied so as to maintain the plasma concentrations of circulating nutrients (lysine, methionine and cystine, threonine, tryptophan, EAA, NEA, glucose, and FA) around their target values (Coik,Pa). Therefore, for a given nutrient, the difference between the actual concentration (Coi,Pa) and the Coik,Pa was used as a driving force (Table 2Go) influencing anabolism and catabolism. Each AA compartment was considered independently without including interactions between them. For visceral proteins (Figure 2Go), anabolic flows were considered a positive exponential function of standardized plasma nutrient concentration [z] = (Coi,Pa - Coik,Pa)/Coik,Pa. The intercept, when the [z] value was 0, corresponded to anabolic flow driven by homeorhesis (as described in previous section). A similar approach was adopted for the catabolic flow; however, it was an exponentially declining function of [z]. For [z] = 0, the intercept value of catabolic flows was only driven by homeorhesis. Consequently, the flows were determined by a homeorhetic process (driving by age) and a homeostatic process (driving by the plasma nutrient concentration). For example, when the concentration of a plasma nutrient falls below its target value, the nutrient is made available through decreased anabolism and increased catabolism. For carcass proteins, another homeostatic mechanism, based on the data of Reeds et al. (1978), Reeds and Lobley (1980), and Wray-Cahen et al. (1998), was used to relate anabolism and catabolism to plasma AA concentrations, and thus, directly to AA intake. They observed that both anabolism and catabolism of protein decreased following reductions in AA intake. Therefore if [z] decreased, both anabolic and catabolic turnover were assumed to decrease linearly (Figure 3Go). The use of exponential functions permits excess AA be more easily stored/mobilized from visceral compared to carcass proteins. Another principle of homeostatic control was applied to modulate the oxidative flow of free AA. It was assumed that this flow depended, as has been observed experimentally in growing pigs (Sève and Ballèvre, 1991), on the concentrations of free plasma AA, according to mass-action kinetics following the function:


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Amino acid concentrations in the protein tissues, plasma, endogenous, integument, and nitrogen content of amino acids used in the model
 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Homeostatic regulation principle applied to AA of the visceral proteins, glucose, and nonesterified fatty acids.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3.

Homeostatic regulation principle applied to AA of the carcass proteins.

 

where Ox1AA1–6 = kAA,ox x QAA1–6,Pa, VeAA,ox = exponential value of AA flow towards oxidation, CoAA1–6,Pa = concentration of AA1–6 in plasma, CoAA1–6k,Pa = balance concentration of AA1–6 in plasma, kAA,ox = oxidation constant for AA, and QAA1–6,Pa = quantity of AA1–6 in plasma.

Plasma Kinetics.
Plasma is a key component in terms of controlling and representing nutrient flows. Plasma volume was assumed to be 55% of blood volume, which was calculated from the data of Susenbeth and Keitel (1988) (Eq. 2.1.21, Appendix 1Go). The entrance flows into plasma originate from absorbed nutrients (AA, glucose, and FA), AA derived from the catabolism of protein stores and glucose and FA from the catabolism of body lipid stores. The outflows from plasma were divided into nutrients of tissue anabolism (AA, glucose, and FA) and endogenous AA losses. The latter represents losses with integument, and endogenous gut protein, and minimum AA oxidation rates. Minimum AA oxidation contributes to minimum urinary N losses. Integument losses of AA (hair and skin epithelial desquamation) were assumed to be 105 mg•kg-0.75•d-1 according to Moughan (1999). Digestive losses of AA were assumed to be 7.087 g•kg-1 DMI, according to Hess and Sève (1999). The DMI was calculated from equations of NRC (1998). Based on biochemistry, all carbon chains derived from AA oxidation yielded glucose. The target values of plasma AA concentrations and the composition of the endogenous digestive and integument losses are shown in Table 2Go. The target plasma concentrations were assumed to be 900 mg•L-1 for glucose (Michel and Rérat, 1998) and 750 mg•L-1 for NEFA (Danfaer, 1999).

Quantitative Description of Tissue Metabolism
Proteins.
To accommodate two different mechanisms of homeostatic control and to account for the large differences in fractional synthesis and degradation rates (Sève et al., 1986; Andersen, 1991), body proteins were split into carcass and viscera. Carcass proteins, which are characterized by a low turnover fractional rate, were mainly skeletal muscle. The initial fractional rate for synthesis and degradation of carcass proteins was assumed to be 0.065 and 0.038•d-1, respectively, which decreased asymptotically to a common value (0.015•d-1) in the adult pig. Carcass proteins in a 25-kg pig were assumed to be 2.8 kg. Visceral proteins, which are characterized by a higher turnover fractional rate, included proteins of viscera, blood, and skin. Blood and skin proteins were included in this group because of their high turnover rates. Initial values of fractional rates of synthesis and degradation of visceral proteins were assumed to be 0.35•d-1 and 0.323•d-1, respectively, which decreased asymptotically to a common value (0.30•d-1) in the adult pig. It was assumed that the mass of visceral proteins in a 25-kg pig was 560 g. The AA composition of each tissue protein is given in Table 2Go.

Lipid.
Initial fractional rates of synthesis and degradation of lipids were assumed, as suggested by the results of Dunshea et al. (1992), to be 0.04 and 0.02•d-1, respectively. These fractional rates decreased asymptotically to the same value (0.01•d-1) in the adult (Danfaer, 1999). The model considered that synthesis of lipids used 90% glucose and 10% FA (Dunshea et al., 1992). In addition, the partitioning of catabolites from the degradation of lipids was assumed to yield 10% glucose (from glycerol in triglycerides) and 90% FA. The glucose and FA partitioning, for both anabolism and catabolism of lipids was constant, because the model remained in the homeorhetic state during the simulation period.

Energy Metabolism.
Energy metabolism was pooled in the ATP and ADP compartments. The main objective of the integration of ATP and ADP was to evaluate the relative energy balance of the whole model when under homeorhetic and homeostatic controls. Although specified and quantified by the model, ATP and ADP did not interact with the metabolic processes in this version of the model. The current model used total oxidation of glucose and fatty acids to synthesize ATP. The ATP dephosphorylation flows were due to the synthesis and degradation of proteins and lipids and the synthesis of urea and glycolysis. The energy costs of the phosphorylation and dephosphorylation processes were provided by Nemmann-Sorensen and Tribe (1983) and Kinney and Tucker (1992) and are indicated in Appendix 1Go.

Model Evaluation.
The model was evaluated by both internal and external analysis. The internal evaluation consisted of a sensitivity analysis for ADG changing key parameter values of metabolism: fractional rates of change in the fractional rate of protein metabolism (Ae,Bp, Ce,Bp) and body lipids (Ae,BLI, Ce,BLI) and the difference in the fractional rate of tissue metabolism between initial and adult state for proteins (Ai,Bp, Ci,Bp) and body lipids (Ai,BLI, Ci,BLI). In order to better quantify the impact of the two most influential parameters, a more refined sensitivity analysis (±10 and ±20%) was performed on protein gain. The external evaluation, carried out according to Bastianelli et al. (1996), compared graphically the simulated protein and lipid gains with several published data sets which had not been used in the development of the model. Model simulations were initiated from a starting body weight of 25 kg for a period of 130 d. Model development and numerical integration were performed with Dynamo Plus (Professional Dynamo Plus, 1986) using Euler’s method. The time step chosen for numerical integration was 0.001•d-1 because the amounts of free AA in the blood is only sufficient to support whole body protein synthesis for a few minutes (Schreurs et al., 1997).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Internal Evaluation
Anabolic and Catabolic Flows.
The nutrients flows of proteins and lipids are shown in Figure 4Go. Between 25 to 125 kg BW, anabolic and catabolic flows of proteins increased from 380 to 1,337 g•d-1 and from 288 to 1,255 g•d-1, respectively. The simulated patterns were different for each protein tissue. Anabolic flows for carcass proteins ranged from 184 to 324 g•d-1 reaching a plateau at 119 kg BW. On the other hand, the anabolic flow of visceral proteins increased almost linearly from 196 to 1013 g•d-1. Catabolic flows of proteins increased from 107 to 256 g•d-1 and from 181 to 999 g•d-1 for carcass and viscera, respectively. The relative contribution of the two protein tissues to nutrients flows changed during the simulation period. The relative contribution of carcass to protein synthesis decreased from 48 to 24% between 25 and 125 kg BW, whereas for protein catabolism it decreased from 37 to 20%. The anabolic flow of lipids increased linearly from 120 to 534 g•d-1 between 25 and 125 kg BW, whereas the catabolic flow of lipids increased from 60 to 260 g•d-1 over the same weight interval.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Simulated metabolic flows of whole body proteins and lipids in pig growth. Anabolic and catabolic flows are represented by solid and broken lines, respectively. {square} = viscera proteins, {triangleup} = carcass proteins, and {circ} = lipids.

 
Sensitivity Analysis.
The results of the sensitivity analysis for ADG are shown in Table 3Go. The ADG was most sensitive to parameters associated with protein anabolism (Ae,BP and Ai,BP). For both an increase and a decrease in Ae,BP values, the initial PG value at 25 kg up to a maximum for each parameter value was simulated (Figure 5Go). The Ae,BP changes mainly modified the BW range at which there was a maximum rate of PG. When sensitivity analysis was evaluated by altering the Ai,BP values, PG was more sensitive to the positive values (Figure 6Go). The differences in PG between all Ai,BP values were lowest at 25 kg, but they increased linearly until maximum PG, and thereafter, the differences decreased regularly up to 125 kg BW.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Sensitivity analysis on the simulated ADG between 60 to 90 kg BW by using variations of ± 20% of the main homeorhetic parameters
 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Sensitivity analysis on protein gain by variation of fractional rate of change in the fractional rate for protein anabolism (Ae,Bp).

 


View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Sensitivity analysis on protein gain by variation of difference in the fractional rate for protein anabolism between the initial state and the adult (Ai,Bp).

 
Protein Gain.
The simulated and observed PG are shown in Figure 7Go. The daily PG increased in a quadratic manner from 91 g•d-1 at 25 kg, to 157 g•d-1 at 64 kg, and then decreased to 82 g•d-1 at 125 kg BW. Reported values of PG often form a similar pattern, but with considerable variability among experiments. The simulated PG were fairly close to the mean gain calculated from published data.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7.

Relationship between simulated and observed protein gain in pig growth. Simulated data (bold line). Experimental data (thin lines) from Thorbeck (1975), Shields et al. (1983), Whittemore et al. (1988), Hansen and Lewis (1993a), Friesen et al. (1994), de Greef et al. (1994), and Quiniou et al. (1995; 1996).

 
Lipid Gain.
The simulated and observed LG are shown in Figure 8Go. Lipid gain increased almost linearly from 60 g•d-1 at 25 kg to 274 g•d-1 at 125 kg BW. Measured LG varied greatly between experiments, and this variability increased with BW. The experimental LG were separated into two distinct groups according to the slope of the trend. Group A, mainly concerning data before 1990, was characterized by a higher rate of LG. Group B, including data from more recent experiments, had a lower rate of LG. The simulated values were closer to the latter group’s values, which represent lean genotypes.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 8. Relationship between simulated and observed lipid gain in pig growth. Simulated data (bold lines). Experimental data (thin lines) from Thorbeck (1975), Shields et al. (1983), Whittemore et al. (1988), Hansen and Lewis (1993a), de Greef and Verstegen (1993; 1994), ; Friesen et al. (19941996), Quiniou et al. (1995; 1996), and Tuitoek et al. (1997). Before (A) and after (B) 1990.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Several models of pig growth have already been published (Whittemore and Fawcett, 1976; Danfaer, 1991; de Lange, 1995). The purpose of the current model was to represent a more mechanistic description of circulating nutrients, tissue turnover, and homeorhetic and homeostatic controls of nutrients flows. The main aspect of the model presented in this paper, which was based on the intrinsic potential of anabolism and catabolism of body proteins and body lipids, was that it did not include a mathematical function to represent growth patterns. In contrast, previous models of growth in various species of animals included mathematical functions on growth and body components (PG) or capacity for growth (cell numbers and/or quantity of DNA) (Black et al., 1986; Whittemore et al., 1988). When comparing ruminant models (Schmidely, 1996), it appears that the basic control of growth, which can be considered as homeorhetic, was accomplished by using cell number and/or DNA synthesis, which were calculated from a logistic growth equation (Oltjen et al., 1986; di Marco et al., 1987; 1989). Homeostatic influences have not appeared per se in previous pig growth models; however, the process of hypertrophy (cell size and protein accretion) proposed by Oltjen et al. (1985) goes some way to representing homeostatic adaptation. In the current model, the homeostatic control was more mechanistically and realistically represented. The model was aimed at representing main principles of homeostasis and homeorhesis. The generated framework may be expanded further, for example, by representing growth responses to changes in nutrient intake and utilization of energy-yielding nutrients. This has been performed in previous models of growth either in the pig (Moughan et al., 1987) or the ruminant (di Marco et al., 1989).

Sensitivity Analysis.
Sensitivity analysis allows the identification and ranking of the major parameters controlling growth, as well as the determination of their upper and lower limits. The ADG predicted by the model was most sensitive to parameters associated with protein metabolism, particularly those associated with protein anabolism in both carcass and visceral protein. The greater sensitivity of ADG to metabolic parameters related to protein corroborates the importance of protein metabolism assumed in many growth models (Danfaer, 1991; Pomar et al., 1991; de Lange, 1995). Data from sensitivity analysis are important for growth models, because they help define parameters, which could be subsequently adapted to cover various genotypes and to link genotype and hypothetical homeorhetic control.

Protein Gain.
In growing pigs, PG is dependent on animal and environmental factors, which may explain a large part of the variations observed between published data. The increase in PG observed over the years is due to the selection programs that have been carried out (Monin et al., 1998). The agreement between observed and simulated PG was slightly better during the initial period (25 to 35 kg) than later. According to the data of Campbell et al. (1988), Hansen and Lewis (1993b), and Quiniou et al. (1996), well-fed modern pigs reach their maximal PG between 65 and 85 kg. This is consistent with PG patterns generated by the model. Moreover, the maximal PG estimated by the model was on the same order of magnitude as those published by the aforementioned authors. The sensitivity analysis of growth rate showed that Ai,BP was the parameter most closely associated with animal precocity, and Ae,BP was best associated with that of PG and growth rates. From a practical point of view, the parameters of the homeorrhetic program for protein metabolism could be adapted by fitting data from different genotypes.

Protein Anabolism.
Experimental values of protein synthesis reported in the literature increase according to a linear function of BW up until approximately 95 kg BW. The anabolic and catabolic flow reported in the literature illustrated that the model’s predictions were within the range of published values (Figure 9Go). Nevertheless, the variability among experimental values is large and increases with BW. In rats, this rate decreased from 29% at 23 d of age to 5% at 330 d (Millward et al., 1975), and from 30% at 25 d to 7% at 90 d (Siebrits and Barnes, 1989). In suckling piglets, it decreased from 58% at 7 d of age to 30% at 26 d (Wray-Cahen et al., 1998). Similarly, for growing pigs, it decreased from 8% for a 25-kg pig (Edmunds and Buttery, 1978) to 6% for a 43-kg pig (Simon et al., 1982). For latter BW values, simulated rates decreased from 11 to 9%. Although higher in the rat than the pig, the rates exhibit the same exponential trend in both species. When considering the partitioning of protein anabolism between viscera and carcass, van der Meulen and Jansman (1997) observed that in growing pigs, over 20% of synthesis was due to visceral proteins. This contributed to 35% for a 25-kg pig (Edmunds and Buttery, 1978) and reached 48% for a 44-kg pig (Simon, 1988) for total protein anabolism. For these BW, simulated anabolic rates of visceral proteins were higher than published values and increased from 51 to 59%. This overestimation of visceral protein synthesis highlights the problem of set growth models when trying to integrate at the tissue metabolism level because the data set available for protein metabolism is limited and variable. It is probably caused, according to Fuller et al. (1995), by differences in the experimental methodologies used to measure synthesis and degradation. However, even with the same technique large errors in calculating protein synthesis due to differences in the specific radioactivities of labeled AA in visceral organs can occur (Simon et al., 1978). A useful approach to the simultaneous and dynamic measurement of both protein synthesis and degradation is the transorgan tracer balance method, particularly if combined with the measurement of tissue amino acid labeling (Reeds and Davis, 1999). The overestimation of visceral protein synthesis may be associated with errors in fractional rates and/or mass of visceral proteins. However, more studies on protein synthesis need to be performed to confirm this hypothesis. In practice, the protein synthesis approach could be adjusted to include a selected data set from the literature.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 9. Simulated (continuous lines) and observed anabolic and catabolic flows of the proteins in pig growth. Observed data from: 1) Fuller et al. (1987), 2) Rao and McCraken (1992), 3) Reeds et al. (1980), 4) Reeds et al. (1981), 5) Roy et al. (1997), 6) Salter et al. (1990), 7) Salter (1988), 8) Tomas et al. (1992), and 9) Mnilk et al. (1996). • = anabolism, {circ} = catabolism.

 
Protein Catabolism.
Both simulated and observed catabolic protein flow increased with BW. Less data are available for measured catabolic flows of visceral and carcass proteins compared to those measured for anabolic flows. However, extrapolation of the results from Simon (1988) and van der Meulen and Jansman (1997) suggests that visceral proteins represent 20 to 40% of total protein degradation up to 50 kg BW. For the same period, the simulated contribution of these proteins to the total catabolic flow was greater than 50%. This overestimation of simulated catabolism of visceral proteins was associated with the same parameters of anabolism for visceral proteins. As both anabolism and catabolism of protein are correlated, the accurate estimation of the anabolic process could adequately predict the catabolic flow of proteins.

Lipid Gain and Lipid Metabolism.
As typically observed, simulated LG increased linearly with BW. A closer agreement with published LG was obtained using recent rather than less selected genotypes. In recent studies, Fuller et al. (1995) and Quiniou et al. (1995) have observed LG rates similar to those predicted by the model. In the proposed model, the description of lipid metabolism was less detailed than that for protein. Although the metabolic diversity of the different fat deposits is known (Mersmann et al., 1981), lack of data prevented the use of this fact in a realistic way. The same situation was observed for the major features of fatty acid metabolism. Nevertheless, the agreement between observed and simulated LG suggested that the homeorhetic control of lipid metabolism was sufficient to represent the major variations between and within animals. In general, the simulated metabolic flow of lipids agreed with the vivo data of Dunshea et al. (1992), although the simulated catabolic flow was lower than that previously observed. However, the aforementioned authors calculated the flow by an indirect approach, assuming a constant fractional rate of degradation (1%•d-1), which contrasts with the idea that this rate decreases with age.

Energy Status Evaluation.
When looking at the energy status, the proposed model took the flows of anabolism and catabolism of body proteins and body lipids as the key components of energy metabolism. These results indicate that the reactions of dephosphorylation (such as ionic exchanges, muscular activity) were not integrated into the model. Several authors have already tried to model energy metabolism in animals by including the major biochemical pathways and ATP yields and utilization (Schulz, 1978). Recently, Chudy (2000) proposed a model built on the "ATP concept," in which all metabolic processes consume or produce ATP-bound energy. This model shows that in order to obtain balanced body ATP, it is necessary to represent metabolic processes at a sufficiently detailed biochemical level, which can be accommodated within the framework of the current model.


    Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
The integration of homeorhetic and homeostatic controls in a mechanistic model can be used to predict anabolic and catabolic flows of protein and lipid in pig growth. Compared to more conventional models of pig growth, the present paper allows further understanding of pig growth at an integrated level in both the short- and the long-term. In its current state, the model serves more as a mechanistic and theoretical framework of nutrient partitioning than as a practical tool for predicting growth in pigs. Further development of this model will focus on the consequences of having an excess and shortage of nutrients on plasma and tissue metabolism in pig growth.


    Footnotes
 
1 The authors wish to thank J. van Milgen for his suggestions concerning the form of the text and critical evaluation of the model. Back

Received for publication March 22, 2001. Accepted for publication July 10, 2002.


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 


Andersen, M. E. 1991. Physiological modelling of organic compounds. Ann. Occup. Hyg. 35:309-321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Anderson, L. C., A. J. Lewis, E. R. Peo Jr., and J. D. Crenshaw. 1984a. Effect of various dietary arginine: Lysine ratios on performance, carcass composition and plasma amino acid concentrations of growing-finishing swine. J. Anim. Sci. 58:362-368.

Anderson, L. C., A. J. Lewis, E. R. Peo Jr., and J. D. Crenshaw. 1984b. Effects of excess arginine with and without supplemental lysine on performance, plasma amino acid concentrations and nitrogen balance of young swine. J. Anim. Sci. 58:369-377.

Aumaitre, A., and P. H. Duée. 1974. Amino acid composition of piglet body proteins between birth and 8 weeks of age. Ann. Zootech. 23:231-236.

Bastianelli, D., D. Sauvant, and A. Rérat. 1996. Mathematical modeling of digestion and nutrient absorption in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1873-1887.[Abstract]

Batterham, E. S., L. M. Andersen, D. R. Baigent, and E. White. 1990. Utilization of ileal digestible amino acids by growing pigs: effect of dietary lysine concentration on efficiency of lysine retention. Br. J. Nutr. 64:81-94.[Medline]

Bauman, D. E., and W. B. Currie. 1980. Partitioning of nutrients during pregnancy and lactation: a review of mechanisms involving homeostasis and homeorhesis. J. Dairy Sci. 63:1514.

Black, J. L., R. G. Campbell, I. H. Williams, and G. T. Davies. 1986. Simulation of energy and amino acid utilization in the pig. Res. Dev. Agric. 3:121-145.

Cai, Y., D. R. Zimmerman, and R. C. Ewan. 1995. Blood urea and amino acid concentrations in pigs of two breed combinations as affected by energy intakes. J. Anim. Sci. 73:145-150.[Abstract]

Campbell, R. G., M. R. Taverner, and D. M. Curic. 1988. Effects of sex and energy intake between 48 and 90 kg live weight on protein deposition in growing pigs. Nutr. Res. Rev. 47:497-503.

Chudy, A. 2000. Model for the interpretation of energy metabolism in farm animals. Pages 329–346 in Modeling Nutrient Utilization in Farm Animals. J. P. McNamara, J. France, and D. E. Beever, ed. CABI Publishing, London.

Danfaer, A. 1991. Mathematical modeling of metabolic regulation and growth. Livest. Prod. Sci. 27:1-18.

Danfaer, A. 1999. Carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Pages 333–362 in A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. I. Kyriazakis, ed. CABI Publishing, London.

de Greef, K. H., and M. W. A. Verstegen. 1993. Partitioning of protein and lipid deposition in the body of growing pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 35:317-328.

de Greef, K. H., M. W. A. Verstegen, B. Kemp, and P. L. van der Togt. 1994. The effect of body weight and energy intake on the composition of deposited tissue in pigs. Anim. Prod. 58:263-270.

de Lange, C. F. M. 1995. Framework for a simplified model to demonstrate principles of nutrient partitioning for growth in the pig. Pages 71–85 in Modeling Growth in the Pig. P. J. Moughan, M. W. A. Verstagen, and M. I. Visser-Reyneveld, ed. EAAP Publ. No.78. Wageningen The Netherlands.

di Marco, O. N., R. L. Baldwin, and C. C. Calvert. 1987. Relative contributions of hyperplasia and hypertrophy to growth in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 65:150-157.

di Marco, O. N., R. L. Baldwin, and C. C. Calvert. 1989. Simulation of DNA, protein and fat accretion in growing steers. Agric. Syst. 29:21-34.

Dunshea, F. R., D. M. Harris, D. E. Bauman, R. D. Boyd, and A. W. Bell. 1992. Effect of porcine somatotropin on in vivo glucose kinetics and lipogenesis in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:141-151.[Abstract]

Edmunds, B. K., and P. J. Buttery. 1978. Protein turnover and whole nitrogen metabolism in the growing pig. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37:32 (Abstr.).

Emmans, G. C., and I. Kyriazakis. 1997. Models of pig growth problems and proposed solutions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 51:119–129.

Friesen, K. G., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, A. P. Schinckel, and M. Einstein. 1996. The use of compositional growth curves for assessing the response to dietary lysine by high-lean-growth gilts. Anim. Sci. 62:159-169.

Friesen, K. G., J. L. Nelssen, R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, J. A. Unruh, D. H. Kropf, and B. J. Kerr. 1994. Influence of dietary lysine on growth and carcass composition of high-lean-growth gilts fed from 34 to 72 kilograms. J. Anim. Sci. 72:1761-1770.[Abstract]

Fuller, M. F., M. F. Franklin, R. McWilliam, and K. Pennie. 1995. The responses of growing pigs, of different sex and genotype, to dietary energy and protein. Anim. Sci. 60:291-298.

Fuller, M. F., P. J. Reeds, A. Cadenhead, B. Seve, and T. Preston. 1987. Effects of the amount and quality of dietary protein on nitrogen metabolism and protein turnover of pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 58:287-300.[Medline]

Hagemeier, D. L., G. W. Libal, and R. C. Wahlstrom. 1983. Effects of excess arginine on swine growth and plasma amino acid levels. J. Anim. Sci. 57:99-105.

Hansen, B. C., and A. J. Lewis. 1993a. Effects of dietary protein concentration (corn:soybean meal ratio) and body weight on nitrogen balance of growing boars, barrows, and gilts: mathematical descriptions. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2110-2121.[Abstract]

Hansen, B. C., and A. J. Lewis. 1993b. Effects of dietary protein concentration (corn:soybean meal ratio) on the performance and carcass characteristics of growing boars, barrows, and gilts: mathematical descriptions. J. Anim. Sci. 71:2122-2132.[Abstract]

Hess, V., and B. Sève. 1999. Effects of body weight and feed intake level on basal ileal endogenous losses in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 77:3281-3288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Karege, C. 1991. Influence de l’âge et du sexe sur l’utilisation de l’énergie et la composition corporelle chez le porc en croissance. PhD Thesis, Université Montpellier II, Montpellier.

Keith, M. O., D. A. Christensen, and B. D. Owen. 1972. Determination of the methionine requirement of growing pigs using serum free amino acids. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 52:163-169.

Kinney, J. M., and H. N. Tucker. 1992. Energy Metabolism. Raven Press, New York.

Lovatto, P. A., and D. Sauvant. 1999. Modélisation des régulations du métabolisme des acides aminés chez le porc. J. Rech. Porcine France. 31:255-259.

Lucas, E. W., P. J. Holden, V. C. Speer, and V. W. Hays. 1969. Effect of protein level during pregnancy and lactation on plasma amino acid profile of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 29:429.

Mersmann, H. J., C. D. Allen, E. Y. Chai, L. J. Brown, and T. J. Fogg. 1981. Factors influencing the lipogenic rate in swine adipose tissue. J. Anim. Sci. 52:1298-1305.

Michel, P., and A. Rérat. 1998. Effect of adding sugar beet fiber and wheat bran to a starch diet on the absorption kinetics of glucose, amino-nitrogen and volatile fatty acids in the pig. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 38:49-68.

Millward, D. J., P. J. Garlick, R. J. Stewart, D. O. Nnanyelugo, and J. C. Waterlow. 1975. Skeletal-muscle growth and protein turnover. Biochem. J. 150:235-243.[Medline]

Mnilk, B., C. I. Harris, and M. F. Fuller. 1996. Lysine utilization by growing pigs: simultaneous measurement of protein accretion and lysine oxidation. Br. J. Nutr. 75:57-67.[Medline]

Monin, G., P. Sellier, and M. Bonneau. 1998. Trente ans d’évolution de la notion de qualité de la carcasse et de la viande de porc. J. Rech. Porcine France 30:13-28.

Montgomery, G. W., D. S. Flux, and R. M. Greenway. 1980. Tryptophan deficiency in pigs: changes in food intake and plasma levels of glucose, amino acids, insulin and growth hormone. Horm. Metab. Res. 12:304-309.[Medline]

Moughan, J. P. 1999. Protein metabolism in the growing pig. Pages 299–331 in A Quantitative Biology of the Pig. I. Kyriazakis, ed. CABI Publishing, London.

Moughan, P. J., W. C. Smith, and G. Pearson. 1987. Description and validation of a model simulating growth in the pig (20–90 kg live weight). NZ J. Agric. Res. 30:481-489.

Nemmann-Sorensen, A., and D. E. Tribe. 1983. Dynamic Biochemistry of Anim. Prod. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

NRC. 1998. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 10th ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Oltjen, J. W., A. C. Bywater, and R. L. Baldwin. 1985. Simulation of normal protein accretion in rats. J. Nutr. 115:45-52.

Oltjen, J. W., A. C. Bywater, R. L. Baldwin, and W. N. Garret. 1986. Development of a dynamic model of beef cattle growth and composition. J. Anim. Sci. 62:86-97.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pettigrew, J. E., M. Gill, J. France, and W. H. Close. 1992. A mathematical integration of energy and amino acid metabolism of lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3742-3761.[Abstract]

Pomar, C., D. L. Harris, and F. Minvielle. 1991. Computer simulation model of swine production systems: I. Modeling the growth of young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 69:1468-1488.[Abstract]

Professional Dynamo Plus—Reference Manual. 1986. Pugh-Roberts Associates, Cambridge, MA.

Quiniou, N., J.-Y. Dourmad, and J. Noblet. 1996. Effect of energy intake on the performance of different types of pig from 45 to 100 kg body weight. 1. Protein and lipid deposition. Anim. Sci. 63:277-288.

Quiniou, N., J. Noblet, J. van Milgen, and J.-Y. Dourmad. 1995. Effect of energy intake on performance, nutrient and tissue gain and protein and energy utilization in growing boars. Anim. Sci. 61:133-143.

Rao, D. S., and K. J. McCraken. 1992. Energy: protein interactions in growing boars of high genetic potential for lean growth. 1. Effects on growth, carcass characteristics and organs weights. Anim. Prod. 54:75-82.

Reeds, P. J., A. Cadenhead, M. F. Fuller, G. E. Lobley, and J. D. McDonald. 1980. Protein turnover in growing pigs. Effects of age and food intake. Br. J. Nutr. 43:445-455.[Medline]

Reeds, P. J., and T. A. Davis. 1999. Of flux and flooding: the advantages and problems of different isotopic methods for quantifying protein turnover in vivo: I. Methods based on the dilution of a tracer. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care 2:23-28.[Medline]

Reeds, P. J., M. F. Fuller, A. Cadenhead, G. E. Lobley, and J. D. McDonald. 1981. Effects of changes in the intakes of protein and non-protein energy on whole-body protein turnover in growing pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 45:539-546.[Medline]

Reeds, P. J., M. F. Fuller, G. E. Lobley, A. Cadenhead, and J. D. McDonald. 1978. Protein synthesis and amino acid oxidation in growing pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 37:106A.[Medline]

Reeds, P. J., and G. E. Lobley. 1980. Protein synthesis: are there real species differences? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 39:43–52.

Richardson, L. R., F. Hale, and S. J. Ritchey. 1965. Effect of fasting and level of dietary protein on free amino acids in pig plasma. J. Anim. Sci. 24:368–372.

Roy, N., H. Lapierre, and J. F. Bernier. 1997. Effect of lysine deficiency on whole body protein metabolism in growing pigs. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56:176A (Abstr.).

Salter, D. N. 1988. The influence on whole-body protein turnover and nitrogen balance of lysine deficiency or excess in barley-based diets for growing pigs. Wiss. Z. Wilhelm-Pieck-Univ. 37:34–35.

Salter, D. N., A. I. Montgomery, A. Hudson, D. B. Quelch, and R. J. Elliott. 1990. Lysine requirements and whole-body protein turnover in growing pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 63:503–513.[Medline]

Sauvant, D. 1992. Modeling homeostatic and homeorhetic regulations in lactating animals. Livest. Prod. Sci. 39:105–113.

Schmidely, P. 1996. Growth in ruminants: a comparison of some mechanistic models. Ann. Zootech. 45:193–214.

Schreurs, V. V., R. E. Koopmanschap, and H. A. Boekholt. 1997. Short-term dynamics in protein and amino acid metabolism. Z Ernahrungswiss 36:336–339.[Medline]

Schulz, A. R. 1978. Simulation of energy metabolism in the simple-stomached animal. Br. J. Nutr. 39:235–254.[Medline]

Sève, B., and O. Ballèvre. 1991. Approches métaboliques du besoin en acides aminés chez le porc en croissance. J. Rech. Porcine France 23:91–110.

Sève, B., P. J. Reeds, M. F. Fuller, A. Cadenhead, and S. M. Hay. 1986. Protein synthesis and retention in some tissues of the young pig as influenced by dietary protein intake after early-weaning. Possible connection to the energy metabolism. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 26:849-861.

Shields, R. G., Jr., D. C. Mahan, and P. L. Graham. 1983. Changes in swine body composition from birth to 145 kg. J. Anim. Sci. 57:43–54.

Siebrits, F. K., and P. M. Barnes. 1989. The change in the rate of muscle protein metabolism of rats from weaning to 90 days of age. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 92A:485–488.

Simon, O. 1988. Metabolism of proteins and amino acids. Page 452 in Protein Metabolism in Farm Animals. B. O. E. H. D. Bock, A. G. Low, O. Simon, and T. Zebrowska, ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Simon, O., H. Bergner, and R. Münchmeyer. 1982. Studies on the range of tissue protein synthesis in pigs the effect of thyroid hormones. Br. J. Nutr. 48:571-582.[Medline]

Simon, O., R. Münchmeyer, and H. Bergner. 1978. Estimation of rate of protein synthesis by constant infusion of labeled amino acids in pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 40:243–251.[Medline]

Southern, L. L., and D. H. Baker. 1982. Performance and concentration of amino acids in plasma and urine of young pigs fed diets with excesses of either arginine or lysine. J. Anim. Sci. 55:857-866.

Susenbeth, A., and K. Keitel. 1988. Partition of whole body protein in different body fractions and some constants in body composition in pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 20:37–52.

The Merck Index. 1996. 12th ed. Merck Research Laboratories, Rathway, NJ.

Thorbek, G. 1975. Studies on nitrogen energy metabolism in growing pigs. Beret. Forsogslab. 159.

Tomas, F. M., R. G. Campbell, R. H. King, R. J. Johnson, C. S. Chandler, and M. R. Taverner. 1992. Growth hormone increases whole-body protein turnover in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 70:3138–3143.[Abstract]

Tuitoek, J. K., L. G. Young, C. F. de Lange, and B. J. Kerr. 1997. Body composition and protein and fat accretion in various body components in growing gilts fed diets with different protein levels but estimated to contain similar levels of ideal protein. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1584-1590.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

van der Meulen, J., and A. J. M. Jansman. 1997. Nitrogen metabolism in gastrointestinal tissue of pig. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56:535-545.[Medline]

von Berthalanffy, L. 1973. Théorie générale des systèmes: physique, biologie, psychologie, sociologie, philosophie. Paris, Ed. Dunod, 296p.

Whittemore, C. T. 1983. Development of recommended energy and protein allowances for growing pigs. Agric. Syst. 11:159-186.

Whittemore, C. T., and R. H. Fawcett. 1976. Theoretical aspects of a flexible model to simulate protein and lipid growth in pigs. Anim. Prod. 22:87–96.

Whittemore, C. T., J. B. Tullis, and G. C. Emmans. 1988. Protein growth in pigs. Anim. Prod. 46:437–445.

Wray-Cahen, D., H. V. Nguyen, D. G. Burrin, P. R. Beckett, M. L. Fiorotto, P. J. Reeds, T. J. Wester, and T. A. Davis. 1998. Response of skeletal muscle protein synthesis to insulin in suckling pigs decreases with development. Am. J. Physiol. 275:E602-609.

Yang, C. J., D. W. Lee, I. B. Chung, Y. M. Cho, I. S. Shin, B. J. Chae, J. H. Kim, and I. K. Han. 1997a. Developing model equation to subdivide lysine requirements into requirements for growth and maintenance in pigs. Asian. Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 10:54–63.

Yang, C. J., D. W. Lee, I. B. Chung, Y. M. Cho, I. S. Shin, B. J. Chae, J. H. Kim, and I. K. Han. 1997b. Developing model equation to subdivide methionine + cystine requirements into requirements for growth and maintenance in pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 10:86–97.

Yang, C. J., D. W. Lee, I. B. Chung, Y. H. Kim, I. S. Shin, B. J. Chae, J. H. Kim, and I. K. Han. 1997c. Developing model equation to subdivide threonine requirements into requirements for growth and maintenance in pigs. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 10:122–133.

Zhang, Y., I. G. Partridge, and K. G. Mitchell. 1986. The effect of dietary energy levels and protein energy ratio on nitrogen and energy balance, performance and carcass composition of pigs weaned at 3 weeks of age. Anim. Prod. 42:389–395.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. van Milgen and J. Noblet
Partitioning of energy intake to heat, protein, and fat in growing pigs
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2003; 81(14_suppl_2): E86 - 93.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lovatto, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvant, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lovatto, P. A.
Right arrow Articles by Sauvant, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS