|
|
||||||||

* APC, Inc., Ankeny, IA 50021 and
and
Department of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State 39762-9665
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Broilers Environment Growth Serum Spray Drying
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The environment in which animals are reared can influence ADG and feed efficiency. Broilers reared in germ-free conditions were heavier than broilers reared in conventional conditions (Coates et al., 1963
). The response to dietary SDP (improved ADG and feed efficiency) was greater in pigs reared in a conventional environment compared to the response to dietary SDP by pigs reared in a clean environment (Stahly et al., 1994
; Coffey and Cromwell, 1995
).
The addition of SDP to drinking water, especially hard water (>180 ppm CaCO3), results in clot formation that blocks water flow especially in typical automatic water systems. Removal of fibrin from plasma (resulting in serum) increases solubility. Administering spray-dried serum through automatic drinking systems adds flexibility and increases consumption of functional proteins during stress periods when feed intake is typically reduced. Therefore, the objective of these experiments was to evaluate the effects of spray-dried serum on broiler performance and carcass quality when administered in drinking water and when provided to broilers housed in three different environments (battery pens, floor pens with new litter, or floor pens with used litter).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1.
Two hundred fifty-two Ross x Cobb male broilers provided by Wayne Farms LLC (Laurel, MS; 1 d of age) were randomly assigned to receive one of six experimental treatments. Treatments were tap water (25°C) mixed with 0, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1.0, or 1.25% (wt/wt) INX. Water was mixed daily and provided ad libitum in trough waterers. The troughs were washed daily and refilled with fresh product. A common broiler starter and grower diet in meal and pellet form, respectively, was manufactured at the Mississippi State University USDA feed mill (Table 1
). Feed was offered ad libitum. Broilers were housed in 42 battery cages (33 x 99 cm) as six broilers per pen and seven pens per treatment. Both starter and grower battery cages were Petersime units with raised wire floors, trough waterers, and trough feeders. The broilers were housed on the Mississippi State University Poultry Research Farm in the Battery House maintained on 23 h of light and 1 h of darkness and constant environmental control. Vaccinations consisted of Mareks given in ovo and Newcastle and infectious bronchitis given by coarse spray at hatch. Pen weights and feed and water intake were measured on d 0, 7, 14, 21, and 42.
|
Experiments 2 and 3.
Two 21-d experiments were conducted utilizing 400 broilers per experiment (10 broilers per pen, 10 pens per treatment). Ross x Ross 308 male broilers (Welp Hatchery, Bancroft, IA; 1 d of age) were randomly assigned to receive one of four experimental treatments. Treatments were tap water (25°C) mixed with 0, 0.45, 0.90, or 1.35% (wt/wt) INX (Table 2
). Water was mixed daily and delivered via free-standing 3.8-L poultry founts (CT Farm and Country, Ames, IA). The founts were washed daily and refilled with fresh product. Commercially available broiler starter feed (Coop Broiler Starter Complete, Farmland Industries, Inc., Kansas City, MO) was used for all treatments throughout the study (Table 2
). Feed was offered ad libitum in trays (729 cm2) from d 0 to 3 followed by hanging gravity flow feeders (Brower, Houghton, IA). Broilers (10 per pen) were housed in floor pens (56 x 122 cm) and contained clean (Exp. 2) or used (Exp. 3) softwood shavings as litter (10-cm depth). Shavings from Exp. 2 were used in Exp. 3. Heat lamps maintained temperatures (at bird level) of 32 to 35°C, 29 to 32°C, and 27 to 29°C for wk 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Broilers were maintained on 23 h of light and 1 h of darkness. Feed and INX samples were collected weekly and stored at -20°C prior to analysis (AOAC, 1990
) for moisture, CP, ash, pH (INX only), ether extract (feed only; Mojonnier assay), and selected minerals (feed only) by a commercial laboratory (Silliker Laboratories of Iowa, Cedar Rapids, IA). Pen weights, feed and water intake, and mortality, were measured daily. Feed efficiency was adjusted to account for dry matter intake from both feed and water.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
A quadratic effect was noted for ADG (P = 0.06), ADFI (P = 0.05), and water intake (P = 0.03) during the first week of the study (Table 5
). The greatest incremental increase in ADG occurred when broilers were fed 0.45% INX compared to 0% INX (18.4 vs. 17.3 g/d, respectively). Broilers consumed an average of 0.3, 0.6, and 0.8 g of INX DM/d from the water when mixed at 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. Feed efficiency response to INX was linear (P < 0.001) and was improved 14.7% by 1.35% INX.
|
Overall (d 0 to 21) ADG, ADFI, and water intake of broilers were improved linearly (P < 0.05) when birds consumed increasing levels INX in the water. The greatest incremental increase in ADG occurred when broilers were fed 0.45% INX compared to 0% INX (42.2 vs. 40.5 g/d, respectively). Daily consumption of INX from the water for three weeks was 0.6, 1.1, and 1.7 g of INX DM/d when mixed at 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. Feed efficiency improved linearly (P < 0.05) with INX, resulting in a 5.4% improvement at 1.35% INX. Mortality (d 0 to 21) was 1.0, 1.0, 7.0, and 5.0% for 0, 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. The 0.90% INX treatment had the highest mortality, which was greater (P < 0.05) than 0 or 0.45% INX.
Experiment 3.
Nutrient analyses of commercial feed (Table 2
) were within acceptable analytical variation and either met or exceeded tag guarantee.
Water intake, ADG, and feed efficiency of broilers were improved linearly (P < 0.001) during the first week of the study (Table 6
). An average increase of 1.0 g/d in ADG occurred with each 0.45% increment of INX, resulting in an 18.5% improvement from 0% to 1.35% INX. Feed intake was unaffected (P > 0.10) by INX. Broilers consumed an average of 0.2, 0.5, and 0.8 g of INX DM/d from the water when mixed at 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. Feed efficiency response to INX was improved 12.2% by 1.35% INX.
|
Linear improvements (P < 0.01) in ADG, ADFI, water intake, and feed efficiency continued during the third week of the study. Broilers consumed an average 0.9, 1.8, and 2.8 g of INX DM/d from the water when mixed at 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. Feed efficiency was improved 4.3% by 1.35% INX.
Overall (d 0 to 21) intake, ADG, and feed efficiency of broilers were improved linearly (P < 0.01) with INX. Broilers consumed on average 0.5, 1.1, and 1.7 g of INX DM/d from the water when mixed at 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively. Feed efficiency for the entire study was improved by 5.4% with 1.35% INX. Mortality (d 0 to 21) was not affected (P > 0.10) by INX (3.0, 1.0, 2.0 and 2.0% for 0, 0.45, 0.90, and 1.35% INX, respectively).
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three experiments were conducted. In Exp. 1, broilers were housed in Petersime batteries in an environmentally controlled room. Experiment 2 was conducted in floor pens with clean litter, whereas Exp. 3 was conducted in the same pens as Exp. 2 but using soiled litter from Exp. 2. These experiments were designed to simulate a clean, low-stress environment (Exp. 1), a moderately clean environment (Exp. 2), and a high-stress, challenging environment (Exp. 3). Hill et al. (1952)
reported that broilers housed in clean, disinfected environments grew faster than broilers housed in unsanitized environments. This was confirmed by Coates et al. (1963)
, in which growth rate of broilers housed in germ-free environments was greater than broilers housed in conventional environments. These differences have been attributed to stimulation of the immune system resulting from pathogen load and nutrient repartitioning, even when no apparent diseases are present (Johnson, 1997
; Klasing and Korver, 1997
).
The present study demonstrates that INX added to the drinking water can improve growth performance of broilers. Furthermore, the environment influences the response to INX. In the current experiments, growth rate of broilers in the clean environment (Exp. 1) during wk 4 through 6 exceeded NRC (1994)
standards (68.5 vs. 66.8 g/d) and was not affected by INX. In Exp. 2 (floor pens, clean litter), INX resulted in a quadratic improvement in ADG during wk 1. Administering INX did not affect growth performance during wk 2 or 3 of the experiment. In Exp. 3 (floor pens, soiled litter), the INX resulted in linear increases in ADG during each weekly period of the experiment.
In Exp. 1 and 3, INX did not affect mortality. In Exp. 2, mortality was greatest with 0.90% INX; however, the reason is unclear. Because 0.90% INX was the intermediate concentration used in the study, higher mortality would not be expected to be caused by INX. Furthermore, Coffey and Cromwell (1995)
demonstrated no differences in mortality related to plasma consumption in pigs housed in different environments. In addition, challenge trials utilizing pigs (Bosi et al., 2001
) and calves (Quigley and Drew, 2000
) have reported improvements in mortality due to consumption of SDP.
Typically, ad libitum feed intake is reduced when the immune system is stimulated (Johnson, 1997
). When INX is added to the water, water disappearance is increased. Addition of INX to the drinking water will result in increased nutrient intake especially if feed intake is depressed because of immune stimulation. It has been suggested that reduced feed intake may result in inadequate energy consumption. The growth response when INX is added to the drinking water may be partially explained by nutrients derived from INX. However, Klasing and Barnes (1988)
showed that nutrient requirements are actually decreased when the immune system is stimulated due in part to reduced tissue accretion. Growth of broilers is improved when they are fed a nutrient-deficient diet supplemented with the limiting nutrient (NRC, 1994
). In these experiments, feed consumption of the control treatment was consistent with NRC (1994)
and industry standards (Ross Tech Manual, 1999). Furthermore, relative to total dry matter intake, INX represented between 1% and 3% of the total dry matter consumption and would represent only a marginal increase in energy or protein consumption. Although it cannot be ruled out, it is unlikely that the response to INX was due to an underlying nutrient deficiency resulting from lower nutrient intake of control broilers.
A more likely explanation for the improvement in the growth response between different environments may be the result of INX reducing overstimulation of the immune system of the broilers. The proposed mechanism agrees with Coffey and Cromwell (1995)
, who reported that pigs consuming SDP and housed in high-antigen environment respond greater than pigs housed in a low-antigen environment. Evidence that SDP or serum reduces the effects of antigenic stimulation (i.e., enteric challenges) are demonstrated by improved ADG (Borg et al., 1999
) and reduced severity of clinical symptoms, such as diarrhea (Borg et al, 1999
; Quigley and Drew, 2000
; Bosi et al., 2001
) and intestinal permeability (Hunt et al., 2002
), when SDP is included in the feed or water. Furthermore, as indicated in these studies, high-antigen environments (floor pens, soiled litter) result in a greater response to INX compared to low- (batteries) or moderate-antigen loads (floor pens, clean litter).
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1 Correspondence: 2425 SE Oak Tree Court (phone: 515-289-7602; fax: 515-268-2453; E-mail: joy.campbell{at}amerprotcorp.com).
Received for publication December 23, 2002. Accepted for publication July 14, 2003.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Crenshaw, R. D. Boyd, J. M. Campbell, L. E. Russell, R. L. Moser, and M. E. Wilson Lactation feed disappearance and weaning to estrus interval for sows fed spray-dried plasma J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3442 - 3453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Campbell, L. E. Russell, J. D. Crenshaw, K. C. Behnke, and P. M. Clark Growth response of broilers to spray-dried plasma in pelleted or expanded feed processed at high temperature J Anim Sci, September 1, 2006; 84(9): 2501 - 2508. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Campbell, L. E. Russell, J. D. Crenshaw, and H. J. Koehnk Effect of Spray-Dried Plasma Form and Duration of Feeding on Broiler Performance During Natural Necrotic Enteritis Exposure J. Appl. Poult. Res., January 1, 2006; 15(4): 584 - 591. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. L. Pierce, G. L. Cromwell, M. D. Lindemann, L. E. Russell, and E. M. Weaver Effects of spray-dried animal plasma and immunoglobulins on performance of early weaned pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2876 - 2885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |