|
|
||||||||


* Animal Sciences Department, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211-5300;
and
National Pork Board, Des Moines, IA 50306; and
and
Animal Sciences Department, Iowa State University, Ames 50011-3150
2 Correspondence:
160 Animal Science Research Center (phone: 573-882-7267; fax: 573-882-6827; E-mail:
KeislerD{at}missouri.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Leptin Meat Quality Pigs
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many genetic companies and breed associations have devoted considerable effort to identifying and marketing breeding stock possessing genetic potential for superior pork quality. These companies and associations have evaluated carcass lean components for such quality characteristics as water holding capacity, color, lean tissue firmness, and marbling (Meisinger, 2002). Aside from laboratory testing for the presence of the halothane gene, an accurate means of assessing quality differences between genotypes in the live animal has yet to be identified. Our objective was to determine if serum concentrations of leptin varied with breeds of pigs in a manner consistent with breed-specific traits for growth, leanness, and quality, and to determine the relationship between serum concentrations of leptin and growth and carcass traits.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Animal live weights and blood samples were collected from offspring of sires representing six distinct breeds of pigs entered into the 2000 National Barrow Show Sire Progeny Test (New Hampton, IA). All pigs were housed in modified open-front structures with ad libitum access to water and a traditional corn-soybean meal diet. Pigs were randomly allotted to pens upon arrival at the test site and were placed eight to a pen according to production system point of origin and breed until they reached the designated harvest weight of 111 kg. Breeds evaluated were Berkshire (n = 131), Chester White (n = 33), Duroc (n = 40), Landrace (n = 23), Poland China (n = 26), and Yorkshire (n = 41). Barrows (n = 168) and gilts (n = 126) were penned separately according to production system point of origin and breed, but both sexes received the same diet. Blood samples were collected upon entry (On-Test Leptin) into the test (average BW = 34 kg) using an optical bleed (Leman et al., 1992) and again via jugular venipuncture at the end of the test, 24 h prior to harvest (Off-Test Leptin). All blood samples were allowed to clot for 6 to 18 h at 4°C followed by centrifugation at 2,500 x g for 30 min. Serum was harvested and stored at -20°C until assayed as described subsequently for leptin by radioimmunoassay.
Pigs were transported for harvest at Quality Pork Processors (Austin, MN; approximately 124 km) in six slaughter groups. Pigs were transported on Mondays, kept in lairage overnight with ad libitum access to water, and humanely harvested as the first group on Tuesday mornings. Postharvest measurements taken were hot carcass weight, carcass length, and midline backfat depth at the last rib. Longissimus muscles were collected from the fabrication line with the outer skin surface and overlying subcutaneous fat remaining on the longissimus muscle (untrimmed) and dissected at the juncture of the 10th and 11th rib for measurement of 10th-rib backfat depth and longissimus muscle area. Longissimus muscle pH (pH-Star probe; SFK Technologies, Peosta, IA) and Hunter L-value (Minolta colorimeter model CR-310; Reston, VA; with a D65 illuminant and standardized on each day of data collection to a white and black tile) were recorded on (in) the cut lean surface adjacent the 10th rib at 24 to 28 h postmortem. Longissimus muscle water-holding capacity (filter paper method; Kauffman et al., 1986), subjective color, marbling, and firmness scores (NPPC, 2000) were evaluated approximately 48 h postmortem. Average daily gain [ADG = (off-test weight - on-test weight)/(off-test date - on-test date)] and chemically derived longissimus muscle (11th rib) intramuscular fat (IMF; official procedure AOAC 960.39; AOAC, 2000) percentages were calculated.
Leptin Radioimmunoassay
Serum concentrations of leptin were quantitated using the double-antibody leptin radioimmunoassay procedures described by Delavaud et al. (2000) with one modification consisting of the substitution of the reported primary antiserum with a different rabbit anti-ovine leptin primary antiserum (number 7105). Briefly, standard concentrations of both recombinant ovine leptin (Gertler et al., 1998) and porcine leptin (Raver et al., 2000; 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.5, 0.8, 1.2, 2.0, 3.5, 5.0 and 7.5 ng/300 µL per tube) and increasing volumes of serum (25, 40, 60, 100, 175, 250, 300 µL) from a pool of serum collected from a fat gilt were added to assay tubes in quadruplicate and the total volume balanced to 300 µL per tube with buffer consisting of 0.1% gelatin, 0.01 M EDTA, 0.9% NaCl, 0.01 M PO4, 0.01% sodium azide, 0.05% Tween-20 (Fisher Scientific; Springfield, New Jersey), pH = 7.1 (PABET). Likewise, 200 µL of the serum samples to be quantified were added to assay tubes in triplicate and the volume balanced to 300 µL/tube with PABET. Immediately thereafter, 100 µL of rabbit anti-ovine leptin primary antiserum (7105; final tube dilution of 1:15,000 in PABET) was added to samples and standards incubated at 4°C for 24 h. After the initial incubation, 100 µL of [125I] ovine leptin (20,000 counts per minute) was added to each tube and incubation continued for an additional 24 h at 4°C. The antigen-antibody complex was then precipitated following a 15-min, 22°C incubation with 100 µL of a preprecipitated sheep-anti-rabbit second antiserum by centrifugation at 2,000 x g for 30 min, and the supernatant removed by aspiration. Assay tubes containing the pellets were counted for 1 min on a LKB1275 gamma counter (LKB Wallac; Turku, Finland).
Standards (ovine and porcine leptins) and pooled aliquots of serum from a single source of fat-gilt serum were linear (log/logit transformation; R2 > 0.98) and parallel over a mass of 0.1 to 7.5 ng/tube and a serum volume of 25 to 300 µL, respectively. Total specific binding was 35%, the minimal detectable concentration was 0.1 ng/tube, percentage recovery of mass was >97% across the range of 25 to 300 µL of sample, and the inter- and intraassay coefficients of variations were less than 10%.
Statistics
Data obtained from carcasses without corresponding Off-Test Leptin values were excluded from analysis. In addition, all carcasses less than 104 kg were excluded from statistical analysis. Data were analyzed using the GLM of SAS (SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC). Fixed effects of off-test date (off-date), breed, and gender (sex) were evaluated for differences associated with On-Test Leptin, Off-Test Leptin, carcass composition, and carcass quality parameters. Effects within the model included On-Test Leptin, Off-Test Leptin, and carcass data predicted by the class variables off-date, breed, sex, and breed x sex interaction. Off-date interactions with breed and gender were tested and found to be insignificant (P > 0.1) and consequently removed from the model. Relationships between concentrations of leptin and carcass traits were quantified by Pearson correlation coefficients. Least squares means were computed and statistically separated with the PDIFF option of SAS. All data are presented as least squares means ± SEM. Differences were designated as significant at P < 0.05 with trends established at P < 0.10.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Off-Test Leptin concentrations were associated with breed effects (P < 0.001). Berkshire pigs had greater (P < 0.05) serum concentrations of leptin at harvest (6.58 ng/mL) than did all breeds except for Poland China (6.45 ng/mL) and Landrace (4.77 ng/mL). These observations were not unexpected, as these breeds differed in body type and because breed differences in peripheral concentrations of leptin have been previously reported to exist in other livestock species noted for their differential ability to deposit fat. In beef cattle for example, Angus bulls had greater concentrations of serum leptin than did Brangus and Brahman bulls of similar ages (Thomas et al., 2002). Peripheral concentrations of leptin have been reported to increase as adipocytes increase in mass (Considine, 1996); therefore, it was not surprising that the Berkshire breed also has the lowest percentage of fat-free carcass lean (46.22%). Off-Test Leptin concentrations were also highly correlated with 10th-rib carcass fat depth (r = 0.518; P < 0.001) and last-rib backfat (r = 0.476; P < 0.001; Table 2
). This agrees with work done in cattle (Minton et al., 1998; Geary et al., 2003), sheep (Delavaud et al., 2000), pigs (Estienne et al., 2000), and horses (Buff et al., 2002), in which subcutaneous fat thickness was correlated to circulating concentrations of leptin.
Correlations (P < 0.001) were also found between Off-Test Leptin and ADG (r = 0.293), carcass length (r = -0.330), longissimus muscle area (r = -0.326), and percentage of fat-free carcass lean (r = -0.508; Table 2
). In beef cattle, two different results were found between longissimus muscle area and serum concentrations of leptin. In a group consisting of only steers, serum leptin concentrations was not found to be correlated to longissimus muscle area; however, in a separate group consisting of steers and heifers, serum concentrations of leptin were negatively correlated to longissimus muscle area (r = - 0.45, P < 0.001; Geary et al., 2003). Differences between gender and breed may have contributed to differences seen in the cattle study. Off-Test Leptin concentrations tended (P = 0.072) to correlate with subjective marbling scores (r = 0.106), but not (P = 0.23) with longissimus muscle percentage intramuscular fat as determined by chemical analysis (r = 0.070). Correlations between marbling scores and serum concentrations of leptin have also been found in cattle (Minton et al., 1998; Geary et al., 2003). A correlation (P = 0.012) was found between Off-Test Leptin concentrations and water-holding capacity (r = -0.147).
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication March 28, 2002. Accepted for publication September 3, 2002.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Suzuki, K. Inomata, K. Katoh, H. Kadowaki, and T. Shibata Genetic correlations among carcass cross-sectional fat area ratios, production traits, intramuscular fat, and serum leptin concentration in Duroc pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2009; 87(7): 2209 - 2215. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Nkrumah, D. H. Keisler, D. H. Crews Jr., J. A. Basarab, Z. Wang, C. Li, M. A. Price, E. K. Okine, and S. S. Moore Genetic and phenotypic relationships of serum leptin concentration with performance, efficiency of gain, and carcass merit of feedlot cattle J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2147 - 2155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Brandt, D. H. Keisler, D. L. Meyer, T. B. Schmidt, and E. P. Berg Serum hormone concentrations relative to carcass composition of a random allotment of commercial-fed beef cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2007; 85(1): 267 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Cassady, O. W. Robison, R. K. Johnson, J. W. Mabry, L. L. Christian, M. D. Tokach, R. K. Miller, and R. N. Goodwin National Pork Producers Council Maternal Line Genetic Evaluation: A comparison of growth and carcass traits in terminal progeny J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3482 - 3485. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. E. Salfen, J. A. Carroll, D. H. Keisler, and T. A. Strauch Effects of exogenous ghrelin on feed intake, weight gain, behavior, and endocrine responses in weanling pigs J Anim Sci, July 1, 2004; 82(7): 1957 - 1966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W. Geary, E. L. McFadin, M. D. MacNeil, E. E. Grings, R. E. Short, R. N. Funston, and D. H. Keisler Leptin as a predictor of carcass composition in beef cattle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2003; 81(1): 1 - 8. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |