J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Easter, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Easter, R. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2002. 80:2402-2411
© 2002 American Society of Animal Science

The effect of litter size and day of lactation on amino acid uptake by the porcine mammary glands1,2,3

T. T. Nielsen*, N. L. Trottier{dagger},4, H. H. Stein{ddagger},5, C. Bellaver§ and R. A. Easter{ddagger}

* Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark; and {dagger} Department of Animal Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing 48824; and {ddagger} Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; and § EMBRAPA CNPSA, Concordia, Brazil

4 Correspondence:
2209 Anthony Hall (phone: 517-432-5140, fax: 517-432-0190, E-mail:
trottier{at}pilot.msu.edu).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Twelve multiparous sows (PIC Camborough 15; parity >2) were used to investigate the relationship between litter size and day of lactation, and plasma amino acid (AA) arteriovenous differences (A-VD), AA uptake, and plasma flow across the mammary glands. Sows were assigned randomly to one of the following litter sizes: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 pigs per litter by cross fostering on d 2 postpartum. All sows were surgically fitted with catheters in the carotid artery and the main mammary vein. Matched arteriovenous blood samples were obtained on d 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 postpartum. Daily mammary uptake of AA was based on the product of plasma A-VD and daily mammary plasma flow (MPF). Daily MPF was estimated using the Fick method based on lysine conservation across the gland, and daily milk production. For the majority of AA, as litter size increased, A-VD did not increase, except for alanine (P < 0.05, linear and quadratic) and valine (P < 0.1; trend; linear and quadratic). As day of lactation increased, A-VD for the majority of AA increased (P < 0.05, linear and quadratic) except for arginine, lysine, and phenylalanine. As litter size increased, net daily mammary AA uptake increased for all indispensable AA (P = 0.001 to P < 0.05, linear and quadratic), excepting arginine. Milk production increased with increasing litter size (P < 0.001, linear) and with increasing day of lactation (P < 0.05, quadratic). Daily MPF increased (P < 0.05, linear) with increasing litter size, but did not change during the period measured from d 9 to 24. In conclusion, litter size appears to be a major determinant of net mammary AA uptake with daily mammary plasma flow a driving variable, whereas AA A-VD is a function of day of lactation and a major variable in determining net AA uptake with advancement of lactation.

Key Words: Amino Acids • Lactation • Mammary Glands • Sows • Uptake


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
The pattern of uptake of amino acids (AA) by the porcine and dairy cow mammary glands differs significantly from that found in secreted milk (Hanigan et al., 1991; Guinard et al., 1994; Trottier, 1997). In consequence, current nutrient models where requirements for milk production are based solely on the AA composition of secreted milk protein may inaccurately predict requirements. Furthermore, empirical approaches such as this provide no means of predicting or maximizing milk production when diet ingredients differ because they lack the mechanistic descriptions necessary to predict how milk production responds to individual nutrients (e.g., AA or energy supply). Modeling AA requirements based on measurement of mammary arteriovenous AA differences (A-VD) and blood flow may allow some description of this process. Other important production factors, such as stage of lactation and suckling load (litter size), could be assessed using the net uptake approach to further refine the model. In cows and goats, the technique has been applied for years; recently this information has been used in the development of a mechanistic model of mammary metabolism in the dairy cow (Hanigan et al., 2001). Due to technical limitations, there have been few attempts to monitor net fluxes of AA by the porcine mammary glands. Previous results (Trottier et al., 1997) indicate that daily net mammary AA uptake by the porcine mammary glands may be regulated through A-VD or mammary plasma flow (MPF). We hypothesized that net AA uptake by the porcine mammary glands increases as litter size and day of lactation increases via an increase in AA A-VD and MPF. The objectives of the present experiment were to examine relationships between mammary net fluxes of AA and litter size and day of lactation, and to evaluate whether increasing litter size and day of lactation increase AA uptake across the porcine mammary system through change in plasma flow or AA extraction rate.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Animals and Experimental Design
The experiment was approved by the University of Illinois Laboratory Animal Care Committee (Protocol No. A3R166).

Twelve multiparous sows (PIC Camborough 15; parity >2) were selected for sound udder conformation and moved to the farrowing facility 1 wk prior to farrowing. Sows were housed in farrowing crates equipped with a plastic-coated expanded metal floor. Drinking water was available at all times from nipple drinkers, and the ambient temperature was kept between 22 and 24°C. Additional heat was provided for nursing pigs by use of heat lamps until 10 d postpartum. After farrowing, sows were given ad libitum access to a common lactation diet (Table 1Go). This diet was also fed at a rate of 2 kg per day starting 1 wk prior to farrowing. Daily sow feed intake and feed refusal were recorded. On d 1 postpartum, pigs and sows were weighed. On d 2 postpartum, sows were assigned randomly to one of the following litter sizes: 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, or 14 pigs. All extra pigs were distributed to other sows in the herd to ensure their welfare. To avoid disturbing the established teat order among pigs, no further additions of pigs to the experimental sows were allowed after this day. Therefore, if a pig died during the experiment, it was not replaced. Two sows (litter 8 and 14) lost piglets during the course of the lactation period. They were included in the statistical analysis model with the corresponding number of pigs at any time-point within the lactation period studied.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Composition of the experimental diet (as fed)
 
On d 5 of lactation, all sows were fitted surgically with catheters in the carotid artery and mammary vein following the procedure described by Trottier et al. (1995). Sows were allowed to recover until d 8 of lactation, when the sampling protocol was initiated. Measurements were divided over the lactation period into six 3-d intervals, i.e., d 8 to 10, d 11 to 13, d 14 to 16, d 17 to 19, d 20 to 22, and d 23 to 25. Milk production was measured by the weigh-suckle-weigh method (Speer and Cox, 1984) on the first day of each interval, i.e., d 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, and 23. Arterial and mammary venous blood samples were obtained on the second day of each interval, i.e., d 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24. Milk samples were collected on the third day of each interval, i.e., d 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, and 25.

Sampling Procedures
Arterial and venous blood samples were collected simultaneously via the carotid and mammary venous catheters, respectively, into Luer Monovette syringes containing lithium heparin (Sarstedt, Pennsauken, NJ). Blood samples were obtained every 20 min over a total period of 100 min (6 samples). Plasma was separated after centrifugation, and equal plasma volumes pooled over the 100-min period. Plasma samples were prepared for AA analysis as described by Trottier et al. (1997). Milk samples were obtained from the third and fourth thoracic gland and prepared for AA analysis following the method described by Trottier et al. (1997).

Calculations and Statistical Analysis
Daily MPF rate (L of plasma/d) and plasma flow-to-milk yield ratio (P:M) (L plasma:L milk) were estimated for each sow and each interval based upon the conservation of lysine across the gland (Fick principle) as described by Trottier et al., 1997. Net daily mammary uptake of each AA (g/d) was calculated from the product of daily MPF and AA A-VD. Percentage extraction was calculated as: 100 x ((A - V)/V). The proportion of each AA taken up by the gland and secreted into milk (proportion secreted in milk, PSM) was calculated as follows:


where

a = AA concentration in milk, g/L milk

b = milk yield, L milk/d

c = A-VD, g/L plasma

d = daily MPF, L plasma/d

Normality of data was tested using the Shapiro-Wilks test defined in the UNIVARIATE procedure of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Amino acid A-VD, extraction rate, net uptake, and arterial concentration, PSM, MPF, milk production, and plasma to milk ratio were analyzed using the GLM procedure of SAS. Litter size and day of lactation were included as regression variables. Day of blood sampling was chosen to represent the regression variable "day of lactation." Litter size and day of lactation were regressed against each independent variable listed above using the following model:


where Y is the independent variable, ß0 is the y intercept, ß1and ß2are the parameter estimates for litter size, and ß3and ß4are the parameter estimates for day of lactation. For AA net uptake, parameter estimates for the quadratic term litter size was not significant for any AA, thus it was not included in this model. Probability values less than 0.05 were considered significant and less than 0.1 were considered indicative of a trend.


    Results and Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Sow and litter performance are presented in Table 2Go. Feed intake and body weight changes of sows during lactation were comparable to similar studies conducted in this facility (Trottier et al., 1997), indicating that the cannulation procedure did not impair performance. For the majority of both indispensable and dispensable AA, no clear relationships (linear or quadratic, P > 0.05) were observed between litter size and AA flow across the mammary glands, i.e., A-VD (Table 3Go) and extraction rate (Table 4Go). As litter size increased, A-VD for only valine (linear and quadratic trend, P < 0.1) and alanine (linear and quadratic, P< 0.05) increased, and extraction rates of indispensable AA increased for only lysine (linear trend;P < 0.1), threonine (linear and quadratic, P < 0.05), and valine (linear and quadratic trend, P < 0.1); of the dispensable AA, an increase was noticed for only alanine (linear,P < 0.05), glutamic acid (linear,P < 0.05), and proline (linear and quadratic, P = 0.05). As litter size increased, milk production increased linearly (Figure 1Go;P < 0.001), in agreement with previously reported studies (King, 2000). Because litter size is the main factor driving total milk production, and milk production is directly dependent on the availability of nutrients for milk synthesis, a stronger relationship between litter size and indispensable AA A-VD across the mammary glands would be expected. Availability of nutrients to the mammary glands depends on both blood nutrient concentration and the rate at which these nutrients are delivered to mammary cells. In this study, sows had access to and consumed similar amounts of feed, thus ensuring that AA availability was similar among litter sizes. Except for the BCAA and threonine, most arterial AA concentration remained unchanged with increasing litter size (Table 5Go).The rate at which the mammary glands extract AA is a reflection of plasma AA concentration and mammary utilization. Lysine, threonine, and valine constitute the main limiting AA in lactating sows diets, which parallel with the increased extraction rate of these AA with increasing litter size. The lack of a strong relationship between litter size and AA A-VD indicates that differences in milk production between varying litter sizes are in great part a product of MPF rate to the entire mammary system, as indicated in Figure 2Go.Indeed, when daily MPF rate was used to calculate daily net AA uptake by the entire mammary gland system (Table 6Go),net AA uptake increased linearly (P < 0.01) for all indispensable AA, and for the majority of dispensable AA (P< 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Sow and litter performance
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Amino acid arteriovenous differences (µmol/L plasma) across the porcine mammary glands in relation to litter sizea
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Amino acid extraction rates (%) across the porcine mammary glands in relation to litter sizea
 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between litter size and milk production. Form of relationship is linear (P < 0.001).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 5. Arterial amino acid concentration (µmol/L plasma) in lactating sows in relation to litter sizea
 


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Relationship between litter size and mammary plasma flow. Litter size effect on mammary plasma flow was linear (P < 0.05). Parameters estimates and standard error of parameter estimates for the best fit equation are b(0) = 1,297 ± 660.1 (P = 0.09); and b(1) = 325.3 ± 76.2 (P < 0.05). r2 = 0.69.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 6. Amino acid uptake (g/d) by the porcine mammary glands in relation to litter sizea
 
It is unknown whether MPF rate to an individual gland or per unit weight varies with different litter sizes. Kim et al. (1999) found that the amount of mammary tissue protein and DNA in individual mammary gland decreased linearly with increasing litter size from 6 to 12 pigs. In this experiment, as litter size increased from 3 to 13, the number of suckled glands increased correspondingly, and average pig daily gain decreased linearly (P< 0.01; data not shown). Thus, it may be deducted that litter size and MPF rate per individual gland are inversely related, although the nature and the strength of this relationship are not known. It is well documented in sows that suckling demand is the major determinant of milk yield from an individual gland (Auldist et al., 1995; Hartmann et al., 1997), hence suckling demand per individual gland may decrease with increasing litter size. Nonetheless, the overall suckling demand to the mammary gland system must be increased with increasing litter size, because milk production increases with increasing litter size. Our sampling site was located at the anterior end of the main mammary vein; hence our plasma flow estimate included the entire mammary gland system, hence all suckled mammary glands. Thus, it is possible that the increased milk production resulting from increased overall suckling demand is a function of blood flow.

Milk production increased as day of lactation increased (quadratic, P< 0.05) and appeared to reach a maximum between d 15 and d 21 (Figure 3Go), agreeing with results reported by Jones and Stahly (1999). As day of lactation increased, both A-VD (Table 7Go)and extraction rates (Table 8Go)for the majority of indispensable AA increased (linear and quadratic, P< 0.05), and appeared to reach a maximum around d 15. This parallels well with our observation that P:M decreased (linear and quadratic trend, P< 0.08) as day of lactation increased (Figure 4Go).On the other hand, MPF varied between 3,700 and 4,500 L per day and did not increase with increasing day of lactation from 9 to 24 (Figure 5Go).All the indispensable AA uptake except arginine (Table 9Go),a product of AA A-VD and MPF, increased or tended to increase as day of lactation increased (linear and quadratic, P< 0.05 toP< 0.1). Therefore, our results imply that as lactation advances in the sow, net AA uptake across the gland increases in great part via an increase in A-VD. It is currently unknown whether this increase in A-VD across the porcine mammary glands results from an increase in passive and(or) active transport of AA across the mammary epithelial cells. Amino acid transport from blood into the mammary gland epithelial cells is mediated by AA transport systems (Shennan and Peaker, 2000), but the mechanisms involved in their regulation have not been studied in vivo.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Relationship between day of lactation and daily milk production. Data are least-square means ± SEM pooled across litter sizes. Form of relationship is quadratic at P < 0.05.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 7. Amino acid arteriovenous differences (µmol/L plasma) across the porcine mammary glands in relation to day of lactationa
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 8. Amino acid extraction rates (%) across the porcine mammary glands in relation to day of lactationa
 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Relationship between day of lactation and plasma flow-to-milk yield ratio (P:M) (L plasma:L milk). Data are least-square means ± SEM pooled across litter sizes. Form of relationship is quadratic at P < 0.076; trend).

 


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Relationship between day of lactation and mammary plasma flow. Data represent least-square means ± SEM. No relationship found between day of lactation and mammary blood flow.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 9. Amino acid uptake (g/d) by the porcine mammary glands as a function of day of lactationa
 
It is unclear why A-VD and extraction rate of lysine and arginine in particular did not change with day of lactation. Trottier et al. (1997) reported that with increasing day of lactation, while lysine A-VD did not change, extraction rate increased. In the present study, in contrast to Trottier et al. (1997), arterial lysine concentration did not decrease with day of lactation (Table 10Go) suggesting that lysine was not limiting. Dietary lysine concentration in the present study was 0.96% as compared with 0.67% in the study by Trottier et al. (1997). Hurley et al. (2000) demonstrated that in vitro lysine uptake in the sow mammary tissue occurred via a sodium-independent transport mechanism with a Km of 1.4 mM, which was approximately 10-fold higher than the arterial plasma concentration of lysine found in this study. Thus, the lack of variation in lysine A-VD by no means indicates that lysine uptake was saturated during the stage of lactation period studied herein. It is possible that changes in A-VD across the porcine mammary glands, as seen for the other AA, occur much earlier than d 9 of lactation for lysine. Therefore, examination of AA flow across the mammary glands is needed at earlier phases of lactation. Arginine shares a common transport system with lysine, which may explain why no change in arginine A-VD occurred either.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 10. Arterial amino acid concentration (µmol/L plasma) in lactating sows in relation to day of lactationa
 
The proportion of milk AA secreted to mammary uptake (PSM) for the dispensable AA were higher than 100% (Table 11Go) while PSM for the indispensable AA, except for histidine, was less than 100%, suggesting that indispensable AA are used in part for the synthesis of dispensable AA within mammary tissue. This also indicates that the mammary gland system is an active metabolic organ with the capacity to retain, catabolize, and synthesize AA needed in the process of both milk and constitutive mammary protein synthesis, and in the synthesis of nonprotein constituents. Lysine PSM is 100% because plasma flow was based on conservation of lysine across the mammary glands. Because lysine shows the highest extraction rate among all AA, and it is the first limiting for milk protein synthesis in lactating sows, its oxidation within the gland is assumed to be minimum. Kim et al. (1999) reported that lysine is accreted by mammary tissue during lactation; however, the daily amount accreted relative to secreted in milk is minimum. Thus, our plasma flow calculation based on lysine conservation may be slightly underestimated. Similar results of mammary plasma flow have been obtained using phenylalanine + tyrosine (Guan, 2000). The lowest PSM were observed for the branched-chain AA (BCAA) and arginine. Recently, DeSantiago et al. (1998) have shown that, unlike the liver, the mammary gland of lactating rats contains significant amounts of enzymes involved in the initial step of BCAA catabolism, i.e., branched-chain amino transferase and branched-chain {alpha}-keto acid dehydrogenase. The activity of both enzymes was shown to increase during lactation, relative to nonlactating and weaned female rats. Leucine and valine are oxidized by porcine mammary tissue (Richert et al., 1998). Taken together, this could explain in part why BCAA may be needed in diets for lactating sows at concentrations above those needed for milk protein synthesis (Richert et al., 1996, 1997). Arginine PSM was the lowest among all indispensable AA. The biochemical basis for such a high rate of arginine uptake by the porcine mammary glands is currently unknown. Arginine can be metabolized by the cow and rabbit mammary tissues (Clark et al., 1975). Arginine is a precursor for many compounds with recognized biological functions, such as nitric oxide, which plays a critical role in vasodilation (Valance et al., 1989), polyamines, which possess regulatory functions in cellular proliferation (Eremin, 1997), and proline (Clark et al., 1975), which is an indispensable AA for the nursing pig (Ball et al., 1986). Indeed, proline PSM was one of the highest among the dispensable AA measured in the present study, as previously reported (Trottier et al., 1997). The ability of the mammary gland system to redirect indispensable AA toward preferential catabolism and(or) the synthesis of dispensable AA suggests that AA flow measurements in addition to milk AA composition should be taken into consideration in building models to determine AA requirements. However, a better understanding of the nutritional or physiological factors involved in the regulation of AA flow across the mammary in vivo is necessary. The present study shows that AA flow across the porcine mammary glands is a function of litter size and day of lactation. The effect of litter size on AA uptake by the mammary glands seems to be mediated through mammary plasma flow rate, because litter size had minimal effects on AA A-VD. In contrast, day of lactation affects net AA uptake by regulating AA A-VD and extraction rates across the mammary glands, because mammary plasma flow rate did not increase with day of lactation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 11. Proportion of milk amino acid output to mammary amino acid uptake (%)a
 

    Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
This study indicates that net AA uptake by the porcine mammary glands is regulated in part by two different physiological mechanisms, namely plasma flow and transport systems across the mammary cells. The increase in milk production associated with increased litter size is a result of an increase in mammary plasma flow to the entire mammary system, whereas the increase in milk production associated with day of lactation is a result of an increase in AA arteriovenous differences across the gland. In addition, results of this experiment suggest that the mammary glands have the capacity to catabolize indispensable AA and redirect them for the synthesis of dispensable AA. Therefore, milk AA composition per se may not accurately predict dietary AA needs of the lactating sow. The information obtained in this study will contribute to development of mechanistic models of AA requirements in the lactating sow.


    Footnotes
 
1 Funded in part by BioKyowa Inc., Chesterfield, MO 63017. Back

2 Presented at the third ASAS Lactation Biology Workshop 1996, Lillehammer, Norway. Back

3 The authors wish to thank T. M. Parr for her assistance and care in animal handling. Back

5 Current address: Department of Animal and Range Sciences, South Dakota State University, Brookings 57007. Back

Received for publication July 20, 2001. Accepted for publication April 24, 2002.


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results and Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 


Auldist, D. E., D. Carlson, L. Morrish, C. Wakeford, and R. H. King. 1995. The effect of increased suckling frequency on mammary development and milk yield of sows. In: D. P. Hennessy, P. D. Cranwell (ed.) Manipulating Pig Production V. Proc. Australasian Pig Sci. Assoc., Werribee, Australia. p 137.

Ball, R. O., J. L. Atkinson, and H. S. Bayley. 1986. Proline as an essential amino acid for the young pig. Br. J. Nutr. 55:659–668.[Medline]

Clark, J. H., R. G. Derrig, C. L. Davis, and H. R. Spires. 1975. Metabolism of arginine and ornithine in the cow and rabbit mammary tissue. J. Dairy Sci. 58:1808–1913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

DeSantiago, S., N. Torres, A. Suryawan, A. R. Tovar, and S. M. Hutson. 1998. Regulation of branched-chain amino acid metabolism in the lactating rat. J. Nutr. 128:1165–1171.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eremin, O.1997. L-arginine: Biological and Clinical Application. R. G. Landes Company, Austin, Texas.

Guan, X.2000. Amino acid trans-membrane transport, net uptake, and intracellular kinetics in the porcine mammary gland during lactation. Ph.D. dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

Guinard, J., H. Rulquin, and V. Verite. 1994. Effect of graded levels of duodenal infusions of casein on mammary uptake in lactating cows. 1. Major nutrients.J. Dairy Sci. 77:2221–2231.[Abstract]

Hanigan, M. D., B. J. Bequette, L. A. Crompton, and J. France. 2001. Modeling mammary amino acid metabolism. Livest. Prod. Sci. 70:63–78.

Hanigan, M. D., E. J. Calvert, E. J. DePeters, B. L. Reis, and R. L. Baldwin. 1991. Whole blood and plasma amino acid uptakes by lactating bovine mammary glands. J. Dairy Sci. 74:2484–2490.[Abstract]

Hartmann, P. E., N. A. Smith, M. J. Thompson, C. M. Wakeford, and P. G. Arthur. 1997. The lactation cycle in the sow: physiological and management contradictions. Livest. Prod. Sci. 50:75–87.

Hurley, W. L., H. Wang, J. M. Bryson, and D. B. Shennan. 2000. Lysine uptake by mammary gland tissue from lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 78:391–395.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Jones, D. B., and T. S. Stahly. 1999. Impact of amino acid nutrition during lactation on body nutrient mobilization and milk nutrient output in primiparous sows. J. Anim. Sci. 77:1513–1522.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kim, S. W., I. Osaka, W. L. Hurley, and R. A. Easter. 1999. Mammary gland growth as influenced by litter size in lactating sows: impact on lysine requirement. J. Anim. Sci. 77:3316–3321.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

King, R. H. 2000. Factors that influence milk production in well-fed sows. J. Anim. Sci. 78(Suppl. 3):19–25.[Free Full Text]

Richert, B. T., R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, and J. L. Nelssen. 1997. Increasing valine, isoleucine and total branched-chain amino acids for lactating sows. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2117–2128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Richert, B. T., R. D. Goodband, M. D. Tokach, and J. L. Nelssen. 1998. In vitro oxidation of branched-chain amino acids by porcine mammary tissue. Nutr. Res. 18:833–840.

Richert, B. T., M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, J. E. Pettigrew, R. D. Walker, and L. J. Johnston. 1996. Valine requirement of the high-producing lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 74:1307–1313.[Abstract]

Shennan, D. B., and M. Peaker. 2000. Transport of milk constituents b the mammary gland. Physiol. Rev. 80:925–951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Speer, V. C., and D. F. Cox. 1984. Estimating milk yield of sows. J. Anim. Sci. 59:1281–1285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Trottier, N. L. 1997. Nutritional control of amino acid supply to the mammary gland during lactation in the pig. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 56:581–591.[Medline]

Trottier, N. L., C. F. Shipley, and R. A. Easter. 1995. A technique for the venous cannulation of the mammary gland in the lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 73:1390–1395.[Abstract]

Trottier N. L., C. F. Shipley, and R. A. Easter. 1997. Plasma amino acid uptake by the mammary gland of the lactating sow. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1266–1278.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Valance, P., J. Collier, and S. Moncada.1989. Nitric oxide synthesized from L-arginine mediates endothelium dependent dilatation in human veins in vivo.Cardiovasc. Res. 23:1053–1057.[Medline]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
J. P. Laspiur, J. L. Burton, P. S. D. Weber, R. N. Kirkwood, and N. L. Trottier
Short Communication: Amino Acid Transporters in Porcine Mammary Gland During Lactation
J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2004; 87(10): 3235 - 3237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
X. Guan, J. E. Pettigrew, P. K. Ku, N. K. Ames, B. J. Bequette, and N. L. Trottier
Dietary protein concentration affects plasma arteriovenous difference of amino acids across the porcine mammary gland
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2004; 82(10): 2953 - 2963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Easter, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, T. T.
Right arrow Articles by Easter, R. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS