J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottger, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bottger, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, G. E.
J. Anim. Sci. 2002. 80:2023-2030
© 2002 American Society of Animal Science

Effects of supplementation with high linoleic or oleic cracked safflower seeds on postpartum reproduction and calf performance of primiparous beef heifers1

J. D. Bottger*,2, B. W. Hess*, B. M. Alexander*, D. L. Hixon*, L. F. Woodard{dagger}, R. N. Funston{ddagger}, D. M. Hallford§ and G. E. Moss*,3

* Department of Animal Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie 82071; and {dagger} Department of Veterinary Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie; and {ddagger} Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman; and and § Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces

3 Correspondence:
P.O. Box 3684 (phone: 307-766-5374; fax: 307-766-2355; E-mail:
gm{at}uwyo.edu).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Primiparous Angus x Gelbvieh (n = 36) rotationally crossed beef cows (initial BW = 487.9 ± 10.5 kg, body condition score = 5.5 ± 0.02) were utilized to determine effects of supplemental safflower seeds high in linoleic (76% 18:2) or oleic (72% 18:1) acid on cow BW change, body condition score, milk production and composition, calf weight gain, cow serum metabolites, and metabolic hormones. On d 3 postpartum, cows were randomly assigned to one of three isonitrogenous dietary supplements with equal total quantity of TDN: corn-soybean control supplement (n = 12); high-linoleate safflower seeds (n = 12); or high-oleate safflower seeds (n = 12). Safflower-seed supplements were formulated to provide 5% DMI as fat. Supplements were individually fed from d 3 postpartum through 90 d postpartum. Cows had ad libitum access to native grass hay (7.8% CP), trace-mineralized salt, and water. Date of parturition was evenly distributed across treatments with all cows calving within 14 ± 0.8 d. There were no differences (P = 0.65) in total OM intake among treatments. Although cow BW change did not differ (P = 0.33) by treatment, supplementation influenced cow body condition score (P = 0.02) with linoleate-supplemented cows in higher (P = 0.005) condition overall than oleate-supplemented cows (5.1 ± 0.06 vs 4.9 ± 0.06). Twenty-four-hour milk production did not differ (P = 0.68) among treatments. Percentage milk fat was not different at d 30; however, at d 60 and d 90 percentage milk fat was greater (P ( 0.05) in control and oleate-supplemented cows than in linoleate-supplemented cows. Calf BW gains (P = 0.27) and adjusted 205-d weights (P = 0.48) were not affected by supplement treatment. Supplementation did not influence serum concentrations of glucose (P = 0.38), NEFA (P = 0.61), GH (P = 0.29), IGF-I (P = 0.81), insulin (P = 0.26), or IGF-I binding proteins (P >= 0.11). Days to conception did not differ (P = 0.40) among treatments. Although overall productivity of the primiparous cows and their calves was not altered by safflower-seed supplementation, differential effects were noted between supplements. Oleate supplementation increased percentage milk fat at d 60, and cow body condition score was lower than in linoleate-supplemented cows. Linoleate-supplemented cows had greater body condition scores by 90 d postpartum than either corn-soybean- or oleate-supplemented cows.

Key Words: Beef Cows • Fats • Reproduction • Safflower


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Dietary supplementation with lipids, such as oilseeds may be a method to more adequately meet nutritional demands associated with growth, lactation, and postpartum reproduction in young beef cows. Feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids to dairy cows increased milk production (Canale et al., 1990, Sklan et al., 1991) and milk fat (Sklan et al., 1991). Prepartum supplementation with safflower seeds high in either linoleate or oleate increased subsequent conception rates in primiparous beef cows (Lammoglia et al., 1997). However, feed supplements containing fat derived from different sources alter duodenal flow of unsaturated fatty acids (Scholliegeredes et al., 2001) and plasma fatty acid composition (Whitney et al., 2000), which appears to result in varied metabolic and reproductive responses (Espinoza et al., 1995; Thomas et al., 1997; De Fries et al., 1998). Supplementation with soybean oil that is high in linoleic acid increased ovarian follicular growth compared to animal tallow or fish oil which have lower linoleic-acid content (Thomas et al., 1997). In addition, cows supplemented with either rice bran (containing roughly equal proportions of linoleate and oleate) or calcium soaps of fatty acids (containing primarily oleic acid) conceived earlier in the breeding season and had greater body condition scores and calf weight gains than cows on control diets (Espinoza et al., 1995; De Fries et al., 1998).

Limited information is available regarding responses to lipid supplements derived from a common source with varying fatty acid composition. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to determine if fatty acid composition of supplements fed postpartum influences overall dam and calf performance when cows consumed medium-quality forage. A second goal was to determine if fatty acid content of the postpartum supplement affects serum metabolites, metabolic hormones, and milk production and composition.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
General
Spring-calving primiparous Angus x Gelbvieh rotationally crossed beef cows (n = 36, initial BW = 487.9 kg ± 10.5 and body condition score [Wagner et al., 1988] = 5.5 ± 0.02 [1 = emaciated, 9 = obese]) were blocked by day of parturition and randomly assigned to one of three supplemental treatments beginning 3 d postpartum. All supplements consisted of dried molasses with the addition of corn and soybean meal, high-linoleate safflower seeds (76% 18:2), or high-oleate safflower seeds (72% 18:1; Table 1Go). Cows were housed in one of six pens with six animals per pen and had ad libitum access to native grass hay (CP = 7.8%, ADF = 46.3%, NDF = 75.7%, total fatty acids = 1.1%, IVDMD = 55.3%) provided in large round bales. Water, trace mineral, and vitamin-fortified salt (NaCl = 12 to 14.4%, Ca = 12 to 14.4%, P >= 12.0%, Mg >= 0.06%, K >= 1.0%, Co >= 1450 ppm, Zn >= 5815 ppm, vitamin A >= 330,693 IU/kg, vitamin B3 >= 33,069 IU/kg) were provided ad libitum. Supplements were individually fed once daily at 0630 for 90 d. Following the 90-d treatment period, all animals were placed in a common group and fed a common diet. Pre-experimental analysis determined that linoleate seeds contained 20.8% CP and 33.9% lipid. Oleate seeds had 16.2% CP and 35.1% lipid. Corn and soybean meal had CP values of 8.9 and 49.6%, respectively. Oilseeds and corn were dry-rolled before the mixing of supplements. Safflower-seed supplements were formulated to provide 5% total DM intake as lipid. Estimates for hay intake and cow performance were based on Alderton et al. (2000). By using estimated hay intake, supplements were formulated to be isonitrogenous and have equal amounts of TDN and meet NRC (1996) nutritional requirements for a 24-mo, 499-kg lactating cow (565 kg mature BW) producing 9.1 kg milk/day during peak lactation. Tabular values for TDN were utilized to formulate supplements (NRC, 1982).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Ingredient composition and nutrient analysis (% DM) of corn-soybean (C), linoleate (L), and oleate (O) supplements fed once daily to primiparous beef cows
 
Sampling
Cow weight and body condition score (scale 1 to 9; Wagner et al., 1988) were obtained when cows were placed on supplement on d 3 postpartum and every 30 d until 90 d postpartum. Calf birth weight; weight at d 30, 60, and 90 of supplementation; and weaning weights were also obtained.

A single blood sample was collected on d 0 to establish baseline concentrations of serum metabolites and metabolic hormones. From d 25 until d 90 postpartum cows were separated from feed at 0500 twice weekly (Monday and Friday), and blood samples were collected to determine concentrations of serum progesterone as an indicator of the onset of corpus luteum function. In addition, blood samples were collected over a 4-d period starting at d 30, d 60, and d 90 postpartum for determination of blood metabolites and metabolic hormones. To partially account for diurnal variation, four a.m. and four p.m. blood samples were collected during the collection period. Collection times in relation to feeding were 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, and 21 h with 0 representing immediately prior to supplementation. All blood samples were collected from the coccygeal vein via venipuncture using 10-mL untreated Vacutainer (Becton Dickinson Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) tubes. Samples were allowed to coagulate overnight at 4°C, and serum was separated by centrifugation (700 x g), and stored at -20°C until analysis.

Beginning on d 25 postpartum and every 30 d thereafter, a mixture of Cr2O3 and flour was fed in pelleted form to provide 10 g/d Cr2O3 for 9 d (Alderton et al., 2000). Following an initial 5-d adaptation period, fecal grab samples were collected before blood sampling twice daily for 4 d. Fecal samples were dried at 55°C, ground using a Wiley Mill (2-mm screen), and composited on an equal DM weight basis.

Milk production was measured on d 30, d 60, and d 90 postpartum using a modified weigh-suckle-weigh technique (Alderton et al., 2000). Each cow was administered a 2-mL i.v. injection of oxytocin after calf removal at 0530 and then milked using a mechanical milking device with remaining milk hand-stripped. Cows were then fed supplement and allowed access to hay, water, and trace-mineralized salt. Six hours later cows were given a second 2-mL injection of oxytocin and milked as described above. Six-hour milk production was extrapolated to 24 h. A subsample (approximately 50 mL) was commercially analyzed (Minnesota DHIA; Zumbrota Laboratory, Zumbrota, MN) for milk fat, protein, total solids, solids nonfat, and somatic cells.

A subsample of each supplement was collected daily and composited over a 2-wk period for analysis. Hay samples were collected by obtaining a core sample from each bale fed. Hay and supplement samples were ground (Wiley Mill, 2-mm screen) for analysis.

Laboratory Analysis
Hay and supplement samples were analyzed in accordance with AOAC (1990) for DM, ash, and CP. Neutral and acid detergent fiber were determined using procedures described by Goering and Van Soest (1970) except that Whatman 541-hardened ashless filter papers (Whatman, Hillsboro, OR) were used instead of fritted disks. Hay and supplement samples were analyzed for in vitro OM disappearance (Judkins et al., 1990). Fecal samples were analyzed for DM, ash (AOAC, 1990), and Cr (Hill and Anderson, 1958) using atomic absorption spectroscopy. Fecal Cr values were used to estimate forage intake as described by Alderton et al. (2000).

Serum samples collected twice weekly were analyzed for progesterone (Eggleston et al., 1990). Inter- and intraassay CV for progesterone were 17.5 and 18.8%, respectively. Onset of the first postpartum estrus was considered to occur 4 d before a rise in concentrations of serum progesterone > 1 ng/mL. Heifers were observed for estrous behavior twice daily beginning at d 50 postpartum, and cows were bred by artificial insemination 12 h following estrus. Heifers were placed with a bull for approximately 60 d following completion of the supplementation period. Day of conception was deduced by subtracting 285 d from the calving date.

Serum samples collected at d 0, d 30, d 60, and d 90 postpartum were analyzed by RIA for insulin (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA), IGF-I (Funston, et al., 1995), and GH (Hoefler and Hallford, 1987). Serum glucose (Sigma 16; Sigma Chemicals, St. Louis, MO) and NEFA (NEFA-C; Wako Chemicals, Dallas, TX) were analyzed by commercially available kits. Intra- and interassay CV were 8.5 and 10.9%, 9 and 13%, and 13 and 20% for insulin, IGF-I, and GH, respectively. Samples for glucose and NEFA were analyzed in a single assay with intraassay CV of 7.3 and 9.9%, respectively. Serum samples obtained at d 0 and those collected immediately before feeding of the supplements on d 30, 60, and 90 were analyzed for IGF-binding proteins using ligand blot procedures (Funston et al. 1995; Funston et al., 1996).

Statistical Analysis
Two calves died during the treatment period due to causes unrelated to experimental treatment. One calf from the linoleate-supplemented group died early in the experimental treatment period, and another calf was successfully grafted onto the cow. Calf data from this cow were removed for analysis. A calf from the oleate-supplemented group died near the end of the experiment. That calf had been gaining weight comparable with its contemporaries; therefore, its data were not removed from the data set. However, due to the influence of suckling on postpartum anestrous, conception data for this cow were removed from the data set.

Initial cow BW and body condition score, and calf birth weights were analyzed as one-way ANOVAs using GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). Since these initial traits did not differ among groups, the need for covariant analysis was precluded. Cow postpartum interval, days to conception, and adjusted weaning weights were analyzed by one-way ANOVA using GLM procedures of SAS (Ver. 8.0; SAS Inst. Inc.). Rate of conception and cows cycling within the 90-d treatment period were analyzed using Chi Square procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc.).

Data for intake, body condition score, cow and calf weight, and weight change over the 90-d supplementation period, milk production and composition, were analyzed using GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc.) with treatment, day, and treatment x day interactions tested as main effects. Animal-within treatment was used as the error term for treatment effects. Differences among means were separated using Fisher’s protected LSD (Steele and Torrie, 1980). Type III sums of squares were used, and least square means and associated standard errors are reported.

Concentrations of serum metabolites and metabolic hormones were first analyzed as a split-split plot to determine any treatment x time, time x day or treatment x time x day effects using GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc.). Treatment x time effects were tested using animal-within treatment x time as the error term, whereas other interactions were tested with residual error. No treatment x time, time x day, or time x treatment x day effects were noted for any of the serum metabolites or metabolic hormones; therefore, average values for the 24-h collection period at d 30, d 60 and d 90 were analyzed using GLM procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc.) with treatment as the main effect, and day and treatment x day interactions tested as subplot effects. Animal-within treatment was used as the error term for treatment effects. Differences among means were separated using Fisher’s protected LSD (Steele and Torrie, 1980). Type III sums of squares were used, and least square means and associated standard errors are reported.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Heifer performance
Post-experiment analysis of the feed (supplements plus hay) actually consumed by cows fed corn-soybean, linoleate, and oleate supplement indicated that the supplements varied somewhat from the predicted formulation (Tables 1 and 2GoGo). Total OM (P = 0.65) and forage (P = 0.66) intake did not differ among supplemental treatments at any sampling period. Estimated forage intake at d 30, d 60, and d 90 averaged 10.2, 10.2, and 10.1 (± 0.4) kg, respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Evaluation of diets corn-soybean (C), linoleate (L), and oleate (O) supplements plus hay using Level 1 of NRC (1996) using chemical composition and performance data from the experiment
 
Milk production over the 90-d postpartum period was not influenced (P = 0.68) by treatment nor was there a treatment x day interaction (P = 0.14). Twenty-four-hour milk production averaged 8.09, 8.38, and 8.29 (± 0.14) kg at d 30, d 60 and d 90, respectively. There was no treatment (P >= 0.38) or treatment x day interactions (P >= 0.34) detected for percentage milk protein, milk solids nonfat, total solids, or somatic cell count. A treatment x day interaction, however, was detected (P = 0.04) for milk fat percentage. Percentage milk fat was similar (P >= 0.12) for all treatment groups at d 30; however, at d 60 corn-soybean and oleate-supplemented cows had greater (P <= 0.05) percentage milk fat than linoleate-supplemented cows [3.53, 3.72 vs. 3.27 (± 0.09), respectively]. At d 90 cows fed the corn-soybean (P = 0.005) and oleate supplement (P = 0.05) had greater percentage milk fat than linoleate supplemented cows [3.88, 3.76 vs 3.51 (± 0.09), respectively].

Cows had similar body condition scores (P = 0.38; 5.5 ± 0.02) and BW (P = 0.87; 487.9 ± 10.5) before initiation of supplemental diets. Treatment did not affect cow BW (P = 0.62; Figure 1Go), BW change (P = 0.33) or cow BW change over time (P = 0.29). By the end of the 90-d feeding period, average weight loss in oleate, linoleate, and corn-soybean supplemented cows was 32.6, 16.3, and 21.1 (± 6.0) kg, respectively. Weight change between each sampling period was, -43.2 kg from d 0 to d 30, -28.6 kg from d 30 to d 60, and -15.6 (± 6.5) kg from d 60 to 90. Although there were no significant effects of type of supplement on cow BW or BW change, there was an effect of treatment on cow body condition score (P = 0.02; Figure 1Go), and a tendency for an effect of treatment on body condition score over time (P = 0.06). Overall, cows consuming oleate supplement had a lower body condition score (4.9 ± 0.06) than those fed linoleate (P = 0.005; 5.1 ± 0.06) or corn-soybean (P = 0.06; 5.0 ± 0.06) supplements. Overall body condition of cows consuming corn-soybean supplement did not differ (P = 0.32) from linoleate-supplemented cows. However, at d 30 and d 60, corn-soybean supplemented cows had a higher (P <= 0.02) body condition score than oleate-supplemented cows. At d 60 linoleate-supplemented cows had a greater (P <= 0.0001) body condition score than oleate-supplemented cows; and at d 90, linoleate-supplemented cows had a greater (P <= 0.04) body condition score than either corn-soybean or oleate-supplemented cows.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. A) Overall means of body condition scores (BCS) for C = corn-soybean control, L = high-linoleate safflower, and O = high-oleate safflower-seed-supplemented primiparous heifers. Body condition score differed by treatment (P = 0.02). Columns with differing subscripts differ (P = 0.005; pooled SE = 0.06). B) Cow weight (kg) during the supplemental period in C-, L-, and O-supplemented cows. Cow weight was not influenced by treatment (P = 0.62) or treatment x day interactions (P = 0.32; pooled SE = 3.75).

 
The length of the postpartum interval (88.2 ± 2.1 d) and number of days to conception (107.6 ± 4.7 d) were similar (P = 0.80; P = 0.40, respectively) among treatments. One cow did not conceive during the breeding season; therefore, overall conception rates did not differ (P = 0.96) and were 12 of 12 for corn-soybean, 11 of 12 for linoleate, and 11 of 11 for oleate-supplemented cows. Number of cows cycling within the 90-d treatment period did not differ (P = 0.50) by supplement treatment.

Calf Performance
Birth weights were similar (P = 0.90) across treatment groups. Calf weight gains during the supplemental period were not influenced by supplement group (P = 0.27) and averaged 30.5, 29.9, and 32.6 (± 1.3) kg for each 30-d period postpartum. In addition, 205-d adjusted weaning weights did not differ (P = 0.48) and averaged 200.1, 199.3, and 207.9 (± 5.5) kg for corn-soybean, linoleate and oleate treatments, respectively.

Metabolic Hormones and Metabolites
Serum concentrations of insulin, IGF-I, and GH were similar (P >= 0.16) on d 0 and were not affected (P >= 0.18) by any treatment x time interactions. Therefore, values were averaged across the 24-h sampling periods at d 30, d 60, and d 90 to evaluate treatment effects. Supplement treatment did not influence serum concentrations of insulin (P = 0.18), IGF-I (P = 0.92), or GH (P = 0.19) nor were there any significant treatment x day interactions (P >= 0.24). Concentrations of insulin and IGF-I, however, increased (P <= 0.001) from d 30 to d 90 postpartum (Figure 2Go). Conversely, concentrations of GH decreased (P = 0.006) over the postpartum period (Figure 2Go). Serum concentrations of glucose and NEFA were not influenced by any time x treatment interaction (P >= 0.60). Concentrations of glucose (66.7 ± 1.0 mg/dL) and NEFA (0.328 ± 0.02 mEq/mL) were not affected (P >= 0.38) by supplement treatment. Supplement treatment also did not influence (P >= 0.11) relative concentrations of any IGF binding proteins nor were there any treatment x day interactions (P >= 0.10). However, IGF binding protein-2 decreased (P <= 0.001) over the postpartum period. In contrast, IGF binding proteins-3 and -4 increased (P <= 0.03) with time postpartum (Table 3Go).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Concentrations (ng/mL) of serum insulin (Panel A), IGF-I (Panel B), and GH (Panel C). Concentrations of hormones did not differ by treatment (P >= 0.26) or treatment x day (P >= 0.09); however, there was an overall day effect (P <= 0.006). Points with differing subscripts differ by day (P <= 0.05). C = corn-soybean control supplement, L = high-linoleate, and O = high-oleate safflower-seed supplement. Pooled SE = 0.07, 5.93, and 0.80 for insulin, IGF-I and GH, respectively.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. IGF binding proteins (IGFBP; relative percentage)a in serum at d 0, 30, 60, and 90 postpartum
 

    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Supplemental safflower treatments formulated to provide approximately 5% of DMI as fat did not adversely affect daily total OM intake. Likewise, DMI in dairy cows was not affected by 6 or 7 % crude fat diets (Drackley et al., 1998; Komaragiri et al.,1998).

Eastridge et al. (1988) noted a decrease in milk production, but not percentage milk fat, when dairy cows were fed a diet containing 8% added soybean oil. When blended fats with mixed fatty acid content made up a smaller proportion of the total diet, however, milk production was not affected (Drackley et al. 1998) or increased slightly (Canale et al., 1990). In the present study, extrapolated 24-h milk production was not affected by supplemental treatments; however, there was a treatment x day interaction for percentage milk fat. Percentage milk fat was greater at d 60 and d 90 in corn-soybean and oleate-supplemented cows than in linoleate-supplemented cows. Bernard and Calhoun (1997) noted a decrease in percentage milk fat and milk fat production in dairy cows fed supplements containing raw soybeans and extruded cottonseeds compared with cows fed a whole cottonseed supplement. Because of the enhanced availability of oil in extruded cottonseeds and the elevated linoleate content in soybeans, the formation of trans-fatty acids from polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., linoleic acid) oils may suppress milk fat production in dairy cows (Selner and Schultz, 1980) and reduce percentage milk fat in linoleate-supplemented cows.

Cows fed oleate supplement lost the most body condition throughout the supplemental feeding period, whereas linoleate-supplemented cows finished the feeding trial with greater body condition scores than either oleate- or corn-soybean-supplemented cows. Such differences also appear to be associated with trends for changes in BW. The greater loss in body condition score by oleate-supplemented cows may be due in part to the increase in milk fat production during peak lactation. Cows supplemented with calcium soaps of fatty acids had more pronounced losses in body condition early in lactation compared with cows fed a control diet; however, recovery of body condition was slower and less pronounced in control cows (Sklan et al., 1989, 1991). Since differences in serum concentrations of NEFA were not noted, it is unlikely that safflower seed supplementation differentially affected lipolysis (Chilliard, 1993). Alternatively, the decrease in milk fat production noted in linoleate-supplemented cows at d 60 and d 90 could have allowed more nutrients to be used for body reserves.

Other studies have reported positive effects of feeding different fats on reproductive performance. Cows fed soybean oil had increased numbers of medium-sized ovarian follicles during a synchronized estrus within 3 wk of supplementation (Thomas et al., 1997). High-linoleic or -oleic safflower seeds fed prepartum increased overall pregnancy rates in primiparous cows (Lammoglia et al., 1997), and calcium soaps of fatty acids fed to cows in poor body condition increased the number of cows bred during the first half of the breeding season (Espinoza et al., 1995). The lack of a beneficial effect of oilseed supplementation on reproductive performance in the present study may be due to the moderate body condition of the cows. Ryan et al. (1994) noted that follicular development in fat-supplemented cows with body condition score of 3 and 4 lagged behind that of cows in better condition. However, by d 15, postpartum cows in body condition score 4 had numbers of medium and large follicles similar to cows in body condition score 6. Although differences in cow body condition score were noted in the present study, their magnitude was probably not sufficient to elicit overall differences in reproductive performance. The directional change in body condition score prior to rebreeding, however, may be of more importance. Houghton et al. (1990) showed that cows in moderate body condition and increasing at the time of insemination had better conception rates than did cows in moderate body condition and losing condition at the time of insemination.

Espinoza et al. (1995) noted increased calf weight gains when dams were supplemented pre- and postpartum with calcium soaps of fatty acids. In that study, cows decreased in body condition score from 4.1 at d 35 postpartum to 2.5 at 50 d postpartum. In the present study, cows changed from a body condition score of approximately 5.5 at parturition to 4.7 by 90 d postpartum. Hence, potential beneficial effects of feeding supplemental fat on calf performance may be more pronounced in dams in poor body condition. Although Melton et al. (1967) and Rutledge et al. (1971) concluded that milk quantity influenced calf growth to a greater extent than milk quality, Christian et al. (1965) emphasized the importance of butterfat to calf gain especially when other sources of variation (i.e., availability of creep feed, quantity of milk) were kept constant. Even though percentage milk fat differed among linoleate and oleate cows in the present study, differences in weaning weights were not detected perhaps because of the availability of forage and the potential for cross-suckling in this confined study.

Consistent effects of fat supplementation on concentrations of insulin and glucose were not apparent in the current study perhaps due to the ability of dietary fatty acids to decrease de novo fatty acid synthesis in mammary and adipose tissue and to stimulate hepatic gluconeogenesis (Chilliard, 1993). Likewise, fat supplementation does not appear to consistently influence the secretion of GH (Chilliard, 1993; present study). Infusion of soybean oil emulsion decreased circulating concentrations of GH in ovariectomized ewes (Estienne et al., 1989). Supplementation, however, with soybean oil, fish oil, or animal tallow increased GH in cows (Thomas et al., 1997).

Circulating (Roberts et al., 1997), ovarian (Thomas et al., 1997; De Fries et al., 1998), and pituitary (Roberts et al., 2001) concentrations of IGF-I have been implicated as mediators of the effects of nutrition on reproduction (Snyder et al., 1999). Furthermore, specific IGF binding proteins present in the circulation or specific tissues can inhibit or potentiate effects of IGF-I. The decline in levels of IGF binding protein-2 noted over time postpartum in the current study is consistent with observations that elevated levels of this binding protein are inversely related to the secretion of LH (Snyder et al., 1999; Kiyma et al., 2001) and duration of postpartum anestrous (Roberts et al., 2001).

Since cows in the current study were in moderate body condition and the postpartum interval was not influenced by supplementation, the lack of significant effects on metabolic hormones is not surprising. The reinitiation of fertile estrous cycles following parturition is of low priority when there are competing demands for a limited supply of nutrients (Short et al., 1990). Based on the observation that linoleate and oleate supplements differentially influenced changes in body condition score and percentage milk fat, we speculate that appropriate fat supplementation may provide a method to selectively influence nutrient partitioning.


    Implications
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 
Supplementation with oilseeds differing in fatty acid content did not influence postpartum reproductive performance in this study. However, body condition score and milk fat percentage were differentially influenced by the fatty acid profile of the supplement. The selective use of high-linoleate safflower seeds may be useful to increase body condition score when prepartum energy deficiencies or suboptimal body condition scores exist at parturition. In moderate-condition cows, however, supplementation with oilseeds was not accompanied by increased animal performance.


    Footnotes
 
1 Supported in part by USDA NRICGP Grant #9902390. Appreciation is expressed to the NIDDK and A. F. Parlow for providing GH assay materials. Back

2 Current address: RR2 Box 135A, Beloit, KS 67420. Back

Received for publication December 21, 2001. Accepted for publication March 8, 2002.


    Literature Cited
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 Implications
 Literature Cited
 


Alderton, B. W., D. L. Hixon, B. W. Hess, L. F. Woodard, D. M. Hallford, and G. E. Moss. 2000. Effects of supplemental protein type on productivity of primiparous beef cows. J. Anim. Sci. 78:3027–3035.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC.

Bernard, J. K., and M. C. Calhoun. 1997. Response of lactating dairy cows to mechanically processed whole cottonseed. J. Dairy Sci. 80:2062–2068.[Abstract]

Canale, C. J., L. D. Muller, H. A. McCahon, T. J. Whitsel. G. A. Varga, and M. J. Lormore. 1990. Dietary fat and ruminally protected amino acids for high producing dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 73:135–141.[Abstract]

Chilliard, Y. 1993. Dietary fat and adipose tissue metabolism in ruminants, pigs, and rodents: A review. J. Dairy Sci. 76:3897–3931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Christian, L. L., E. R. Hauser, and A. B. Chapman. 1965. Association of preweaning and postweaning traits with weaning weight in cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 24:652–659.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Fries, C. A., D. A. Neuendorff, and R. D. Randel. 1998. Fat supplementation influences postpartum reproductive performance in Brahman cows. J. Anim. Sci. 76:864–870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Drackley, J. K., D. W. LaCount, J. P. Elliot, T. H. Klusmeyer, T. R. Overton, J. H. Clark, and S. A. Blum. 1998. Supplemental fat and nicotinic acid for Holstein cows during an entire lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 81:201–214.[Abstract]

Eastridge, M. L., M. D. Cunningham, and J. A. Patterson. 1988. Effect of dietary energy source and concentration on performance of dairy cows during early lactation. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2959–2966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Eggleston, D. L., C. Wilken, E. A. Van Kirk, R. G. Slaughter, T. H. Ji, and W. J. Murdoch. 1990. Progesterone induces expression of endometrial messenger RNA encoding for cyclooxygenase. Prostaglandins 39:675–683.[Medline]

Espinoza, J. L., J. A. Ramirez-Godinez, J. A. Jimenez, and A. Flores. 1995. Effects of calcium soaps of fatty acids on postpartum reproductive activity in beef cows and growth of calves. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2888–2892.[Abstract]

Estienne, M. J., K. K. Schillo, M. A. Green, and J. A. Boling. 1989. Free fatty acids suppress growth hormone, but not luteinizing hormone, secretion in sheep. Endocrinology 125:85–91.[Abstract]

Funston, R. N., G. E. Moss, and A. J. Roberts. 1995. Insulin like growth factor I and IGF binding proteins in bovine sera and pituitaries at different stages of the estrus cycle. Endocrinology 136:62–68.[Abstract]

Funston, R. N., G. E. Siedel, J. Klindt, and A. J. Roberts. 1996. Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in bovine serum and follicular fluid before and after preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone. Biol. Reprod. 55:1390–1396.[Abstract]

Goering, H. K., and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis (apparatus, reagents, procedures, and some application). Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS, USDA, Washington, DC.

Hill, F. W., and D. L. Anderson. 1958. Comparison of metabolizable energy and productive energy determination with growing chicks. J. Nutr. 64:587–603[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hoefler, W. C., and D. M. Hallford. 1987. Influence of suckling status and type of birth on serum hormone profiled and return to estrus in early postpartum spring-lambing ewes. Theriogenology 27:887–895.

Houghton, P. L., R. P. Lemenager, L. A. Horstman, K. S. Hendrix, and G. E. Moss. 1990. Effects of body composition, pre- and postpartum energy level and early weaning on reproductive performance of beef cows and preweaning calf gain. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1438–1446.[Abstract]

Judkins, M. B., L. J. Krysl, and R. K. Barton. 1990. Estimating diet digestibility: A comparison of 11 techniques across six different diets fed to rams. J. Anim. Sci. 68:1405–1415

Kiyma, Z., E. A. Van Kirk, W. J. Murdoch, and G. E. Moss. 2001. Effects of feed restriction on ovulation and reproductive hormones in ewes. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52:418–421.

Komaragiri, M. V. S., D. P. Casper, and R. A. Erdman. 1998. Factors affecting body tissue mobilization in early lactation dairy cows. 2. effect of dietary fat on mobilization of body fat and protein. J. Dairy Sci. 81:169–175.[Abstract]

Lammoglia, M. A. R. A. Bellows, E. E. Grings, J. W. Bergman, R. E. Short, and M. D. MacNeil. 1997. Effects of dietary fat composition and content, breed, and calf sex on birth weight, dystocia, calf vigor, and postpartum reproduction of first calf beef heifers. Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci.. 48:81–83.

Melton, A. A., J. K. Riggs, L. A. Nelson, and T. C. Cartwright. 1967. Milk production, composition and calf gains of Angus, Charolais, and Hereford cows. J. Anim. Sci. 26:804–809.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

NRC. 1982. United States-Canadian Tables of Feed Composition. 3rd ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 1996. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th ed. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

Paterson, J., R. Cochran, and T. Klopfenstein. 1996. Degradable and undegradable protein responses of cattle consuming forage-based diets. In: Proc. Grassl. Livest. Nutr. Conf., Custer, SD. pp 94–103.

Roberts, A. J., R. N. Funston, and G. E. Moss. 2001. Insulin-like growth factor binding proteins in the bovine anterior pituitary. Endocrinology. 14:399–406.

Roberts, A. J., R. A. Nugent, III, J. Klindt, and T. G. Jenkins. 1997. Circulating insulin-like growth factor I, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, growth hormone, and resumption of estrus in postpartum cows subjected to dietary energy restriction. J. Anim. Sci. 75:1909–1917.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Rutledge, J. J., O. W. Robinson, W. T. Ahlschwede, and J. E. Legates. 1971. Milk yield and its influence on 205-day weight of beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 33:563–567.

Ryan, D. P., R. A. Spoon, M. K. Griffith, and G. L. Williams. 1994. Ovarian follicular recruitment, granulosa cell steroidogenic potential and growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-I relationships in suckled beef cows consuming high lipid diets: effects of graded differences in body condition maintained during the puerperium. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 11:161–174.[Medline]

Scholliegeredes, E. J., B. W. Hess, K. R. Hightower, G. E. Moss, D. L. Hixon, and D. C. Rule. 2001. Biohydrogenation, flow and disappearance of fatty acids in beef cattle fed supplemental high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds. In: Proc. West. Sect. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 52:59–62.

Selner, D. R., and L. H. Schultz. 1980. Effects of feeding oleic acid or hydrogenated vegetable oils to lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 58:1235–1241.

Short, R. E., R. A. Bellows, R. B. Staigmiller, J. G. Berardinelli, and E. E. Custer. 1990. Physiological mechanisms controlling anestrus and infertility in postpartum beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 68:799–816.[Abstract]

Sklan, D., E. Bogin, Y. Avidar, and S. Gur-Arie. 1989. Feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids to lactating cows: effect on production, body condition and blood lipids. J. Dairy Res. 56:675–681.[Medline]

Sklan, D. E., U. Moallem, and Y. Folman. 1991. Effect of feeding calcium soaps of fatty acids on production and reproductive responses in high producing lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci. 74:510–517.[Abstract]

Snyder, J. L., J. A. Clapper, A. J. Roberts, D. W. Sanson, D. L. Hamernik, and G. E. Moss. 1999. Insulin-like growth factor-I, insulin-like growth factor-binding proteins, and gonadotropins in the hypothalamus pituitary axis and serum of nutrient-restricted ewes. Biol. Reprod. 61:219–224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Steele, R. G. D., and J. J. Torrie. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: A Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York.

Thomas, M. G., B. Bao, and G. L. Williams. 1997. Dietary fats varying in their fatty acid composition differentially influence follicular growth in cows fed isoenergetic diets. J. Anim. Sci. 75:2512–2519.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Wagner, J. J., K. S. Lusby, J. W. Oltjrn, J. Rakestraw, R. P. Wettemann, and L. E. Walters. 1988. Carcass composition in mature Hereford cows: Estimation and effect on daily metabolizable energy during winter. J. Anim. Sci. 66:603–612.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Whitney, M. B., B. W. Hess, L. A. Burgwald-Balstad, J. L. Sayer, C. M. Tsopito, C. T. Talbott, and D. M. Hallford. 2000. Effects of supplemental soybean oil level on in vitro digestion and performance of prepubertal beef heifers. J. Anim. Sci. 78:504–514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
N. M. Long, G. M. Hill, J. F. Baker, W. M. Graves, D. H. Keisler, and B. G. Mullinix Jr.
Case Study: Reproductive Performance of Beef Cows Fed Whole Soybeans Before the Breeding Interval
Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 639 - 647.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. P. Banta, D. L. Lalman, C. R. Krehbiel, and R. P. Wettemann
Whole soybean supplementation and cow age class: Effects on intake, digestion, performance, and reproduction of beef cows
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1868 - 1878.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. W. Hess, G. E. Moss, and D. C. Rule
A decade of developments in the area of fat supplementation research with beef cattle and sheep
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E188 - E204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, T. R. Weston, E. J. Scholljegerdes, C. M. Murrieta, B. M. Alexander, D. C. Rule, G. E. Moss, and B. W. Hess
Effects of postpartum dietary fat and body condition score at parturition on plasma, adipose tissue, and milk fatty acid composition of lactating beef cows
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 717 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, D. C. Rule, and B. W. Hess
Postpartum supplemental fat, but not maternal body condition score at parturition, affects plasma and adipose tissue fatty acid profiles of suckling beef calves
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1811 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, W. T. Small, E. L. Belden, S. I. Paisley, D. C. Rule, and B. W. Hess
Immune response and serum immunoglobulin G concentrations in beef calves suckling cows of differing body condition score at parturition and supplemented with high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 997 - 1003.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, D. M. Hallford, G. E. Moss, D. C. Rule, and B. W. Hess
Effects of body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat on metabolite and hormone concentrations of beef cows and their suckling calves
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(4): 1038 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, V. Nayigihugu, C. M. Murrieta, R. L. Atkinson, D. C. Rule, T. J. Robinson, and B. W. Hess
Effects of body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat on adipose tissue lipogenic activity of lactating beef cows
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 397 - 404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, R. L. Atkinson, V. Nayigihugu, S. I. Paisley, D. C. Rule, G. E. Moss, T. J. Robinson, and B. W. Hess
Body condition score at parturition and postpartum supplemental fat effects on cow and calf performance
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2908 - 2917.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Martin, R. J. Rasby, D. R. Brink, R. U. Lindquist, D. H. Keisler, and S. D. Kachman
Effects of supplementation of whole corn germ on reproductive performance, calf performance, and leptin concentration in primiparous and mature beef cows
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2663 - 2670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. W. Hess, S. L. Lake, E. J. Scholljegerdes, T. R. Weston, V. Nayigihugu, J. D. C. Molle, and G. E. Moss
Nutritional controls of beef cow reproduction
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2005; 83(13_suppl): E90 - 106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. J. Scholljegerdes, B. W. Hess, G. E. Moss, D. L. Hixon, and D. C. Rule
Influence of supplemental cracked high-linoleate or high-oleate safflower seeds on site and extent of digestion in beef cattle
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2004; 82(12): 3577 - 3588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. N. Funston
Fat supplementation and reproduction in beef females
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E154 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bottger, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bottger, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, G. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS