|
|
||||||||
Department of Animal Science, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211
2 Correspondence:
S133 Animal Sciences Center (phone: 573-882-7859; fax: 573-884-4545; E-mail:
carlsonm{at}missouri.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: Excretion Growth Piglets Plasma Zinc
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experiment 1
In Exp. 1, 90 crossbred (GenetiPorc USA, LLC, Morris, MN) pigs (avg 6.45 ± 0.17 kg and 24 ± 0.5 d of age) were weaned and allotted to one of five dietary treatments based on initial weight, sex, and litter. Pigs were housed in an environmentally regulated building with concrete-slatted flooring over a pit. There were six replications with 30 pens and three pigs in each pen. Pigs were allowed 0.32 m2/pig. Each pen had one four-hole self-feeder and one nipple waterer.
Experiment 2
In Exp. 2, 100 crossbred (GenetiPorc USA) pigs (avg 5.47 ± 0.01 kg and 18 d of age) were weaned and allotted to one of five dietary treatments based on initial weight, sex, and litter. Pigs were housed in an environmentally regulated nursery facility with woven-wire flooring over a shallow flush system. There were five replications with 25 pens and four pigs in each pen. Pigs were allowed 0.23 m2/pig. Each pen had two one-hole self-feeders and two nipple waterers.
Experiment 3
In Exp. 3, 15 crossbred (GenetiPorc USA) barrows (avg 5.31 ± 0.006 kg and 17 d of age) were weaned and allotted to one of five dietary treatments based on initial weight and litter. Pigs were placed in individual stainless steel metabolism cages equipped with stainless steel feeders and waterers in the environmentally controlled room at the University of Missouri Animal Science Research Center. After a 10-d adaptation period to the individual cages and experimental diets, feces and urine were collected for five 24-h periods. There were three replications per treatment.
Diets
Pigs were fed typical Phase 1 (Exp. 1, 2, and 3) and Phase 2 (Exp. 1 and 2) nursery diets. Each phase had five dietary treatments. The basal diet contained 100 ppm Zn as ZnSO4. The five dietary treatments were developed by supplementing the basal diet with the following concentrations and sources of zinc: 1) 150 ppm Zn as ZnO (feed-grade, 72% Zn), 2) 500 ppm Zn as ZnO, 3) 500 ppm Zn as Availa-Zn 100 (ZINPRO, Eden Prairie, MN), 4) 500 ppm Zn as SQM-Zn (QualiTech, Chaska, MN), and 5) 3,000 ppm Zn as ZnO. Availa-Zn 100 (10% Zn) is a zinc amino acid complex which, described by the Association of American Feed Control Officials (AAFCO), is a product resulting from the complexing of a soluble metal salt with an amino acid(s). Sea-Questra-Min Zn, or SQM-Zn (22% Zn), is a metal polysaccharide complex that is described by AAFCO as a product resulting from complexing a soluble salt with a polysaccharide solution declared as an ingredient as the specific metal complex. Phase 1 nursery diets were pelleted and fed as crumbles from d 0 to 14 after weaning. Phase 2 nursery diets were fed as pellets from d 15 to 28 after weaning. All nutrients met or exceeded NRC (1998) recommendations for nursery pigs (Table 1
).
|
Feces and Urine Analysis
In Exp. 3, feces and urine were collected twice every 24-h period at meal times (0700 and 1600). Feces from each 24-h period were combined, mixed thoroughly, weighed, sealed in plastic bags, and stored in a freezer at -18°C. Urine from each 24-h period was combined, mixed thoroughly, strained, its volume was measured, sampled (10 to 30% aliquot), and stored at -18°C in 1-L polypropylene bottles. Chromic oxide (0.05 %) was used as a nondigestible indicator. Hydrochloric acid (6 N) was used as a preservative in the urine. Fecal samples were dried in a mechanical convection oven (GCA Corp., Chicago, IL, Model 845) at 55°C for 24 h and ground in a stainless steel Wiley Mill. Urine samples were prepared for mineral analysis by deproteination with 10% trichloroacetic acid. Fecal samples were prepared for mineral analysis by the nitric-perchloric acid wet digestion procedure as used for tissues. Zinc concentration of feces and urine was determined by flame absorption spectrophotometry.
Tissue Analysis
On d 15 of Exp. 3, all 15 pigs were killed using a lethal injection of pentobarbital sodium (390 mg/mL at 1 mL/4.5 kg of BW) into the jugular vein to obtain liver and kidney tissues. The whole organs were immediately weighed and placed in bags on ice. Tissue samples (approximately 1 g) were prepared for mineral analysis by nitric-perchloric acid wet digestion (Carlson et al., 1999) using 3 mL of 10 M perchloric acid and 20 mL of 10 M nitric acid. Zinc concentrations were determined by flame absorption spectrophotometry.
Zinc Determination
All zinc analyses were determined using glassware that had been washed in 30% nitric acid and rinsed with deionized distilled water. Bovine liver standard (1577b; National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD) was used to establish accuracy of instrument analysis. Variation was accepted within the specified limits of NIST. Zinc concentrations were calculated using exogenous calibration curves.
Statistical Analysis
Data for all experiments were analyzed as a randomized complete-block design using appropriate General Linear Model procedures of SAS (SAS Inst. Inc., Cary, NC). In Exp. 1 and 2, pen was the experimental unit used for analysis of both growth performance and plasma Zn. In Exp. 3, pig was the experimental unit for analysis of plasma, liver, kidney, fecal, and urinary Zn concentration. The mean differences between treatments were tested by comparison of least significance difference.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.05) was observed in ADG among pigs fed 150 or 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO or 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100. On d 28, pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as SQM-Zn or 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO averaged 2.7 kg heavier than pigs fed 150 or 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO and 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100. During d 15 to 28 (Phase 2), ADFI differed among dietary treatments (P = 0.03); pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as SQM-Zn or 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO had greater ADFI (P < 0.05) than pigs fed 150 ppm added Zn as ZnO or 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100. Over the 28-d period, ADFI was not affected (P > 0.05) by dietary Zn treatments. At no time during the 28-d study did dietary Zn affect the feed efficiency (gain/feed) of these nursery pigs under these experimental conditions (P
0.09).
|
0.05) growth performance. Pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO were 2.05 kg heavier than pigs fed any of the other four dietary treatments at the end of the 28-d experiment. Feed efficiency was only affected by dietary Zn treatment during wk 2 of Phase 1 (d 8 to 14). Pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100 had lower gain/feed (P < 0.05) than those fed the other four dietary Zn treatments.
|
0.05).
|
0.05) to those of pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO or 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100. In Exp. 2, pigs fed dietary Zn treatments had similar (P
0.05) plasma Zn concentrations on d 7. On d 28, pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO had greater (P < 0.05) plasma Zn concentrations than pigs on any other dietary Zn treatment. On d 15 of Exp. 3, plasma Zn concentration did not differ (P = 0.06) among dietary treatments.
|
Feces and Urine Characteristics
Daily fecal and urinary Zn excretions of pigs in Exp. 3 are shown in Table 4
. Fecal volume was not different between dietary Zn treatments (P
0.05), and the average fecal volume was 8 ± 0.2 g DM/d. Dietary treatment affected (P < 0.05) urinary volume. Pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO had the greatest (P
0.05) volume per day of urine, with 179 mL/d excreted. The lowest urinary volume was seen in pigs fed 150 ppm added Zn as ZnO (99 mL/d), with 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO, Availa-Zn 100, or SQM-Zn being intermediate (110, 133, or 150 mL/d, respectively). Pigs fed 150 ppm added Zn as ZnO excreted less (P < 0.05) Zn in the feces than pigs fed any other dietary treatment. Pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO, Availa-Zn 100, or SQM-Zn had similar (P
0.05) amounts of fecal Zn excreted. However, pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO excreted almost four times as much fecal Zn as those pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO, Availa-Zn 100, or SQM-Zn (P < 0.05). The greatest urine Zn excretion was observed in pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO (P < 0.05); all other dietary treatments were similar (P
0.05).
Zinc Balance
Zinc balance was calculated using actual daily Zn intake minus daily urine and fecal Zn excretion and is shown in Figure 1
. The Zn balance of pigs was negative for all dietary treatments, meaning more Zn was excreted than ingested, after receiving the respective dietary treatments for 15 d. Pigs fed 150 ppm added Zn as ZnO were in the least negative balance, but were similar to pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO, Availa-Zn 100, or SQM-Zn (P > 0.05). Pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO showed the most negative Zn balance (P < 0.05) compared with pigs fed the other four dietary Zn treatments.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The differences observed between Exp. 1 and 2 may be due to environmental variations. In Exp. 2, the building was a more modern nursery building with woven-wire flooring over a shallow flush system. The pigs in Exp. 1 were housed in an older grower building, with concrete-slatted flooring over a pit. Those pigs possibly were stressed or more environmentally challenged with increased disease exposure due to the concrete flooring over a pit. Another possible cause of the inconsistent results seen between the two experiments may be due to the variations in weaning weights and ages of the pigs. The pigs in Exp. 1 had an average weaning weight of 6.45 ± 0.17 kg and an average age of 24 ± 0.5 d, whereas the pigs in Exp. 2 had an average weaning weight of only 5.47 ± 0.01 kg and average age of 18 d of age, indicating variations in health status or length of exposure to disease transmission from the sow.
Results of Exp. 3 show that after the 10-d adjustment period, pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO were in a negative Zn balance, indicating that the pigs were excreting more Zn than they were consuming on a daily basis (Figure 1
). Urine Zn concentrations increased as a greater amount of Zn was supplemented in the diet. Pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO excreted 2.68 mg Zn/d in urine and 2,157 mg Zn/d in feces, which is in agreement with results reported by Hoover et al. (1997a), who fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO for 14 d prior to collection. Pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as ZnO, Availa-Zn 100, or SQM-Zn excreted an average of 500 mg Zn/d of Zn in the feces. Therefore, dietary concentrations of Zn fed to nursery pigs above 500 ppm from inorganic or organic sources of Zn results in excess Zn excreted in feces.
Although plasma concentrations and tissue storage are not the same as bioavailability, there were differences in plasma and tissue Zn concentrations between dietary treatments in the present study. Pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO had the highest plasma Zn concentrations on d 14 in Exp. 1 and d 28 in Exp. 2 compared to the other four dietary treatments. However, mean plasma Zn concentrations of all pigs, independent of dietary treatment, remained within the normal range (0.5 to 1.5 mg/L). In Exp. 3, plasma Zn concentrations exceeded this normal range, possibly due to a change in bleeding time (p.m. vs a.m.) and to the fact that the pigs were individually fed a slightly higher ADFI and Zn intake. Hepatic Zn concentrations were highest for pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO, with an average Zn concentration of 3,019 ppm. Renal Zn concentrations were highest for pigs fed 3,000 ppm added Zn as ZnO (79 ppm), and pigs fed 500 ppm added Zn as Availa-Zn 100 had similar concentrations (72 ppm). It has been reported that Zn absorption is affected by Zn status and that as dietary Zn increases absorption decreases in pigs (Wang et al., 1993). Although not evaluated in this experiment, it is likely that the amount of endogenously secreted Zn from gastrointestinal secretions may also increase.
It has become routine in the swine industry to add high concentrations (2,000 to 3,000 ppm) of inorganic Zn to nursery diets as a growth promotant. However, the biological mechanism behind the enhanced growth performance is unknown. Carlson et al. (1998) reported that feeding pharmacological concentrations of Zn (3,000 ppm Zn as ZnO) produced deeper crypts and greater total thickness in the duodenum and increased intestinal metallothionein concentrations, which indicates that high amounts of Zn have an enteric effect on the nursery pig. Katouli et al. (1999) reported that 2,500 ppm Zn from ZnO supplemented in the weaned pig diets is beneficial for maintaining the stability of the intestinal microflora and the diversity of the coliforms only during the first 2 wk after weaning. However, Mavromichalis et al. (2000) found that neither high (93%) nor low (39%) bioavailable ZnO affects intestinal morphology of weaned pigs.
It has also been speculated that Zn enhances growth through a systemic effect within the body (via the blood) rather than an enteric effect in the intestinal tract. In this case, organic sources would be more effective than inorganic sources due to higher bioavailability. Wedekind et al. (1994) reported that neither inorganic Zn as ZnO nor organic Zn as Zn methionine or Zn lysine (amino acid complexes) provided more bioavailable Zn than ZnSO4 when three different concentrations of each source were fed to 25- to 90-kg pigs. Mavromichalis et al. (2000) observed that feeding ZnO sources with either high (93%) or low (39%) bioavailabilities did not affect the growth rate in nursery pigs during a 21-d study. In the present study, growth rate was improved under certain nursery conditions by feeding 500 ppm added Zn as SQM-Zn, but pigs fed an additional 500 ppm of either organic (SQM-Zn and Availa-Zn 100) or inorganic (ZnO) Zn source had similar plasma, tissue, urine, and fecal Zn concentrations. These studies demonstrate that bioavailability is irrelevant to the efficacy of growth performance of nursery pigs fed high concentrations of Zn. Further research is needed to determine the specific mode of action and metabolic change through which high dietary concentrations of Zn from either organic or inorganic sources affect growth performance of nursery pigs.
| Implications |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
Received for publication May 21, 2001. Accepted for publication January 18, 2002.
| Literature Cited |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Castillo, S. M. Martin-Orue, J. A. Taylor-Pickard, J. F. Perez, and J. Gasa Use of mannanoligosaccharides and zinc chelate as growth promoters and diarrhea preventative in weaning pigs: Effects on microbiota and gut function J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 94 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Hedemann, B. B. Jensen, and H. D. Poulsen Influence of dietary zinc and copper on digestive enzyme activity and intestinal morphology in weaned pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3310 - 3320. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Rincker, G. M. Hill, J. E. Link, A. M. Meyer, and J. E. Rowntree Effects of dietary zinc and iron supplementation on mineral excretion, body composition, and mineral status of nursery pigs J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2762 - 2774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. Buff, D. W. Bollinger, M. R. Ellersieck, W. A. Brommelsiek, and T. L. Veum Comparison of growth performance and zinc absorption, retention, and excretion in weanling pigs fed diets supplemented with zinc-polysaccharide or zinc oxide J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2380 - 2386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Hollis, S. D. Carter, T. R. Cline, T. D. Crenshaw, G. L. Cromwell, G. M. Hill, S. W. Kim, A. J. Lewis, D. C. Mahan, P. S. Miller, et al. Effects of replacing pharmacological levels of dietary zinc oxide with lower dietary levels of various organic zinc sources for weanling pigs J Anim Sci, September 1, 2005; 83(9): 2123 - 2129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Hojberg, N. Canibe, H. D. Poulsen, M. S. Hedemann, and B. B. Jensen Influence of Dietary Zinc Oxide and Copper Sulfate on the Gastrointestinal Ecosystem in Newly Weaned Piglets Appl. Envir. Microbiol., May 1, 2005; 71(5): 2267 - 2277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. B. Williams, L. L. Southern, and T. D. Bidner Effects of supplemental dietary phytase and pharmacological concentrations of zinc on growth performance and tissue zinc concentrations of weanling pigs J Anim Sci, February 1, 2005; 83(2): 386 - 392. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. R. Augspurger, J. D. Spencer, D. M. Webel, and D. H. Baker Pharmacological zinc levels reduce the phosphorus-releasing efficacy of phytase in young pigs and chickens J Anim Sci, June 1, 2004; 82(6): 1732 - 1739. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Carlson, C. A. Boren, C. Wu, C. E. Huntington, D. W. Bollinger, and T. L. Veum Evaluation of various inclusion rates of organic zinc either as polysaccharide or proteinate complex on the growth performance, plasma, and excretion of nursery pigs J Anim Sci, May 1, 2004; 82(5): 1359 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. van Heugten, J. W. Spears, E. B. Kegley, J. D. Ward, and M. A. Qureshi Effects of organic forms of zinc on growth performance, tissue zinc distribution, and immune response of weanling pigs J Anim Sci, August 1, 2003; 81(8): 2063 - 2071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |