J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on November 6, 2009
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-1874
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Casas, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Garcia, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Casas, E.

Effect of bovine respiratory disease and overall pathogenic disease incidence on carcass traits

M. D. Garcia, R. M. Thallman, T. L. Wheeler, S. D. Shackelford and E. Casas

U.S. Meat Animal Research Center, USDA, ARS, Clay Center, NE 68933

Eduardo.Casas{at}ARS.USDA.GOV

Abstract

The objective this study was to evaluate the effects of incidence of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) and overall incidence of pathogenic diseases (IPD) on carcass traits. Two independent populations were used; the first population included crossbred steers (GPE7; n = 642) derived from sires of 7 Bos taurus breeds: Angus, Charolais, Gelbvieh, Hereford, Limousin, Red Angus, and Simmental. The second population included crossbred steers (GPE8; n = 621) derived from tropically adapted Bos taurus breeds and Bos indicus influenced breeds: Beefmaster, Brangus, Bonsmara, and Romosinuano, as well as Hereford and Angus. Treatment records for BRD, infectious keratoconjunctivitis, and infectious pododermatitis were available for these populations. Incidence of BRD was treated as an independent effect. Incidences of the 3 microbial pathogenic diseases were pooled into a single trait to represent an overall pathogenic disease incidence. Traits evaluated were HCW, KPH, LM area, marbling score, fat thickness, dressing percentage, yield grade, retail, fat, and bone yields, and meat tenderness. Both, BRD and IPD were associated with differences in yield grade in GPE7 and GPE8. Animals treated for BRD had lower yield grades (P = 0.003 and P = 0.02, in GPE7 and GPE8, respectively) than untreated animals. Animals treated for IPD had lower yield grades (P = 0.0006 and P = 0.004, in GPE7 and GPE8, respectively) than untreated animals. Incidence of BRD and IPD were associated with a reduction in fat thickness in GPE7 and GPE8. Animals treated for BRD had lower adjusted fat measurements (P = 0.0007 and P = 0.01, in GPE7 and GPE8) than untreated animals. Animals treated for IPD also had lower adjusted fat measurements (P = 0.0003 and P = 0.002, in GPE7 and GPE8) than untreated animals. Animals treated for BRD or IPD in the GPE7 population also had lower estimated KPH measurements than unaffected animals. Animals affected with BRD in GPE8 had higher shear force measurements than unaffected animals. Animals affected with IPD in GPE8 had higher HCW and fat yield measurements, but lower bone yield and retail product yield measurements than unaffected animals. The relationship between disease and carcass traits should be given consideration by future studies that aim to develop selection strategies based on specific traits.

Key Words: beef cattle • carcass traits • shipping fever







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.