J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online first on October 23, 2009
J. Anim Sci. 1910. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1378
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hackmann, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Spain, J. N.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hackmann, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Spain, J. N.

A mechanistic model for predicting intake of forage diets by ruminants

Timothy J. Hackmann and James N. Spain

Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia MO 65211

spainj{at}missouri.edu

Abstract

Accurate voluntary feed intake (VFI) prediction is critical to the productivity and profitability of ruminant livestock production systems. Simple empirical models have been used to predict VFI for decades but are inflexible, restrictive, and poorly accommodate many feeding conditions, such as those of developing countries. We have developed a mechanistic model to predict VFI over a range of forage diets (low- and high-quality grasses and legumes) by wild and domestic ruminants of varying physiological states (growth, lactation, gestation, non-productive). Based on chemical reactor theory, the model represents the reticulorumen, large intestine, and blood plasma as continuous stirred-tank reactors and the small intestine as a plug flow reactor. Predicted VFI is that which (i) fulfills an empirical relationship between chemostatic and distention feedbacks observed in the literature and (ii) leads to steady-state conditions. Agreement between observed and actual VFI was high (generally R2 > 0.9, root mean square prediction error < 1.4 kg/d, CV < 25%). Root mean square prediction error for our model was only 67% of that of the Beef NRC (2000) model, the leading empirical prediction system for cattle. These results together demonstrate that our model can predict ruminant VFI more broadly and accurately than prior methods and, by consequence, serve as a crucial tool to ruminant livestock production systems.

Key Words: mechanistic model • ruminant • voluntary feed intake







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.