J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 1950. 9:7-12.
© 1950 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. W.
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, U. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Scott, G. W., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Ashworth, U. S.

The Value of Refuse Screenings as a Feed for Livestock1

G. W. Scott, Jr., T. H. Blosser, A. O. Shaw and U. S. Ashworth

The State College of Washington2

Abstract

  1. A study has been made of the chemical composition, apparent digestibility, and TDN content of refuse screenings.
  2. Studies were also conducted on the numbers and kinds of weed seeds present in the ground refuse screenings and the viability of these seeds both before and after being subjected to the process of digestion.
  3. The chemical composition of the refuse screenings studied was: dry matter, 90.4%; ash, 8.7%; ether extract, 6.8%; crude protein, 14.5%; crude fiber, 15.6%; and nitrogen-free extract, 45.1%.
  4. The refuse screenings had a TDN content of 58.4 when fed alone and 61.6 when fed with alfalfa hay.
  5. Feces voided on a diet of refuse screenings alone contained no viable weed seeds.


Footnotes

1 Published as Scientific Paper No. 845, Agricultural Experiment Station, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, State College of Washington, Pullman.

2 Division of Dairy Husbandry. The authors are grateful to the Department of Animal Husbandry for furnishing the ewes and metabolism cages used in this experiment and to Dr. R. W. Colby of that department for his assistance and helpful suggestions. Further acknowledgment is made to Dr. L. W. Rasmussen and Miss Mary Haferkamp of the Agronomy Department who conducted the germination studies.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1950 by the American Society of Animal Science.