J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:2853-2859. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1703
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1703v1
87/9/2853    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frugé, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Southern, L. L.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frugé, E. D.
Right arrow Articles by Southern, L. L.

NONRUMINANT NUTRITION

Effect of incremental levels of red blood cells on growth performance and carcass traits of finishing pigs1,2

E. D. Frugé, T. D. Bidner and L. L. Southern3

School of Animal Sciences, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge 70803-4210

3 Corresponding author: lsouthern{at}agctr.lsu.edu

Three experiments were conducted to determine the effect of incremental levels of red blood cells (RBC; 0 to 4%, Exp. 1; 0 to 2%, Exp. 2 and 3) on growth performance and carcass traits of finishing pigs. Dietary treatments were formulated to meet or exceed the nutrient requirements of barrows and gilts gaining 350 g of lean BW gain per day and were formulated to contain 0.52% apparent ileal digestible (AID) Lys for barrows and 0.59% AID Lys for gilts. In Exp. 1, barrows and gilts (2 replicates of barrows and 2 of gilts; 4 pigs per pen) were fed 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4% RBC. Initial BW (mean ± SD) was 84.6 ± 4.9 and 82.42 ± 4.8 kg, and final BW was 118.7 ± 6.5 and 120.0 ± 9.6 kg for barrows and gilts, respectively. Two barrows and 2 gilts per pen were randomly selected and slaughtered for collection of carcass measurements. Experiment 2 was similar to Exp. 1, except 0, 1, or 2% RBC were added. Initial BW was 82.5 ± 6.4 and 79.2 ± 7.0 kg, and final BW was 125.5 ± 6.2 and 119.8 ± 8.8 kg for barrows and gilts, respectively. Each dietary treatment had 4 replicates per sex with 4 pigs per pen. One barrow and 1 gilt per treatment replicate were randomly selected and slaughtered for collection of carcass traits and viscera weights. Experiment 3 was similar to Exp. 2 except only barrows were used, and the initial and final BW were 86.0 ± 5.7 and 133.4 ± 8.4 kg, respectively. Each dietary treatment had 4 replicates with 3 pigs per pen, and all pigs were slaughtered for collection of carcass traits and viscera weights. In Exp. 1, final BW, ADG, and G:F were decreased linearly (P < 0.01 to 0.10) as RBC addition increased, but ADFI was not affected. With increased RBC addition, average backfat increased (P < 0.09) and fat free lean decreased (P < 0.04). There was a quadratic effect (P < 0.04) on dressing percentage (DP); the 2% RBC addition increased DP, but the 3 and 4% additions decreased DP. The RBC addition had no effect (P > 0.10) on any remaining carcass measurements. In Exp. 2, there was a quadratic effect (P < 0.07) of RBC addition on average backfat; the 1% RBC addition decreased backfat, but the 2% addition returned backfat to the level of the control pigs. There was no effect (P > 0.10) on any other response variable. In Exp. 3, with increased RBC addition, average backfat linearly decreased (P < 0.04) and large intestine percentage increased (P < 0.09). There was no effect of RBC addition (P > 0.10) on any other response variable. Our data indicate that feeding 3 or 4% RBC decreases growth performance of finishing pigs. However, feeding 1 or 2% RBC to finishing pigs had no detrimental effects on growth performance and increased DP in one experiment.

Key Words: carcass measurement • finishing pig • growth performance • red blood cell







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.