J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:2806-2814. doi:10.2527/jas.2009-1926
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2009-1926v1
87/9/2806    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Filho, O. G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcelos, J. L. M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Filho, O. G. S.
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcelos, J. L. M.

PHYSIOLOGY, ENDOCRINOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Strategies to improve fertility in postpartum multiparous Bos indicus cows submitted to a fixed-time insemination protocol with gonadotropin-releasing hormone and prostaglandin F2{alpha}1

O. G. Sá Filho*, E. R. Vilela*, T. W. Geary{dagger} and J. L. M. Vasconcelos*,2

* Departamento de Produção Animal, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia-UNESP, P 18618-000, Brazil; and {dagger} USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301

2 Corresponding author: vasconcelos{at}fca.unesp.br

In Exp. 1, we evaluated the effects of 2 lengths of progesterone exposure [CIDR (controlled intravaginal drug release); 7 vs. 14 d] before a modified CO-Synch protocol [50.0-µg injection of GnRH 6.5 d before a 25.0-mg injection of PGF2{alpha} followed by another injection of GnRH and fixed-time AI (TAI) 2 d after PGF2{alpha}], with or without temporary weaning (TW) before GnRH treatments, on fertility of suckled multiparous Bos indicus cows (n = 283) and on calf performance. Timed AI pregnancy rates for cows receiving 7 d CIDR + TW, 7 d CIDR, 14 d CIDR + TW, and 14 d CIDR were 53, 47, 46, and 41%, respectively (P > 0.10). Calves submitted to two 48-h TW 6 d apart had decreased mean BW at 240 d (187.9 ± 2.7 vs. 195.5 ± 2.7 kg; P < 0.05), but BW at 420 d was not affected by TW (240.1 ± 5.1 kg). In Exp. 2, we evaluated the effect of no treatment and treatment with or without a CIDR insert between GnRH and PGF2{alpha} treatments of a modified CO-Synch protocol on pregnancy rate to TAI, and throughout a 90-d breeding season in suckled multiparous Bos indicus cows (n = 453). The inclusion of a CIDR between first GnRH and PGF2{alpha} treatments of a modified CO-Synch protocol did not improve pregnancy rate (29 and 33% for cows receiving CO-Synch + CIDR and CO-Synch protocol, respectively), and cycling cows had poorer TAI pregnancy rates than anestrous cows treated with either synchronization protocol (21.7 vs. 40.7%; P < 0.05). However, regardless of treatment with CIDR, cows submitted to TAI protocol had greater (P < 0.05) pregnancy rates at 30 (54.8 vs. 11.2%), 60 (72.1 vs. 38.8%), and 90 d (82.0 vs. 57.9%) of breeding season than untreated cows.

Key Words: anestrous • Bos indicus • gonadotropin-releasing hormone • progesterone-releasing intravaginal insert • prostaglandin F2{alpha} • timed artificial insemination







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.