J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:1934-1940. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1579
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1579v1
87/6/1934    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holm, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Irons, P. C.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holm, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Irons, P. C.

ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

The value of reproductive tract scoring as a predictor of fertility and production outcomes in beef heifers1

D. E. Holm2, P. N. Thompson and P. C. Irons

Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X04, Onderstepoort, 0110, South Africa

2 Corresponding author: dietmar.holm{at}up.ac.za

In this study, 272 beef heifers were studied from just before their first breeding season (October 15, 2003), through their second breeding season, and until just after they had weaned their first calves in March, 2005. This study was performed concurrently with another study testing the economic effects of an estrous synchronization protocol using PG. Reproductive tract scoring (RTS) by rectal palpation was performed on the group of heifers 1 d before the onset of their first breeding season. The effect of RTS on several fertility and production outcomes was tested, and the association of RTS with the outcomes was compared with that of other input variables such as BW, age, BCS, and Kleiber ratio using multiple or univariable linear, logistic, or Cox regression. Area under the curve for receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare the ability of different input variables to predict pregnancy outcome. After adjustment for BW and age, RTS was positively associated with pregnancy rate to the 50-d AI season (P < 0.01), calf weaning weight (r = 0.22, P < 0.01), and pregnancy rate to the subsequent breeding season (P < 0.01), and negatively associated with days to calving (r = 0.28, P < 0.01). Reproductive tract scoring was a better predictor of fertility than was Kleiber ratio and similar in its prediction of calf weaning weight. It was concluded from this study that RTS is a predictor of heifer fertility, compares well with other traits used as a predictor of production outcomes, and is likely to be a good predictor of lifetime production of the cow.

Key Words: age at puberty • beef heifer • Kleiber ratio • pregnancy rate • reproductive tract scoring • weaning weight




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, D. J. Wilson, D. A. Mallory, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson
Comparison of controlled internal drug release insert-based protocols to synchronize estrus in prepubertal and estrous-cycling beef heifers
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2009; 87(12): 3976 - 3982.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.