HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2008-1426v1 87/6/1865    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Google Scholar Articles by Phocas, F. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Phocas, F.

Genetic analysis of breeding traits in a Charolais cattle population segregating an inactive myostatin allele

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, UMR1313 Génétique Animale et Biologie Intégrative, bat 211, F-78352 Jouy-en-Josas

¹ Corresponding author: florence.phocas{at}jouy.inra.fr

The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of the Charolais-specific inactive myostatin allele on phenotypic means and genetic parameters of heifer breeding traits. Records were registered from 1996 to 2006 in 282 herds dedicated to the on-farm French Charolais purebred progeny test. Data consisted of 36,867 female calf records, including 17,518 inseminated heifers that were bred by 186 genotyped sires, of which 43 were heterozygous and 6 were double muscled bulls. Six traits were analyzed under a univariate animal model accounting for maternal effects and myostatin sire genotype: calving difficulty, birth and weaning weights, muscle and skeleton scores at weaning, and fertility of artificially inseminated heifers. The inactive myostatin allele had a large positive effect on weaned heifer muscle score, unfavorable effects on calving difficulty and skeleton score, and small effects on birth and weaning weight. This allele did not induce an adverse effect on heifer fertility. Univariate estimates of polygenic variance parameters were almost unaffected by the estimation of the myostatin sire genotype, except for heifer morphology traits. Direct and maternal genetic variances and covariances were significantly reduced under a model accounting for the myostatin sire genotype effect on muscle score. The myostatin genotype explained 45% of the direct genetic variance and had a pleiotropic action across both direct and maternal effects on muscle score. Because the myostatin sire genotype had no significant effect on birth weight, the multitrait sire analysis concerned only the 5 other traits. Accounting for the myostatin sire genotype, estimates of polygenic correlation between skeleton score and muscle score, on the one hand, and calving difficulty on the other hand, were largely modified: from a negative estimate of –0.3 to 0.0 and from a positive estimate of 0.4 to 0.7, respectively.

Key Words: beef cattle • calving difficulty • double muscling • fertility • genetic parameter • myostatin