HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2008-1002v1 87/5/1801    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Thériault, M. Articles by Castonguay, F. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thériault, M. Articles by Castonguay, F. W.

Accuracy of real-time ultrasound measurements of total tissue, fat, and muscle depths at different measuring sites in lamb¹

M. Thériault^*,, C. Pomar^* and F. W. Castonguay^*,,2

^* Dairy and Swine Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada, J1M 1Z3; and Département des sciences animales, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada, G1V 0A6

² Corresponding author: francois.castonguay{at}fsaa.ulaval.ca

Accuracy of live ultrasound measurements to evaluate the total tissue depth (GR), as well as fat and LM depths at different scanning sites, was studied in 96 purebred Suffolk and Dorset lambs of both sexes slaughtered between 36 and 54 kg of BW. Before slaughter, 7 real-time ultrasound measurements were taken on lambs: fat and LM depths between the 12th and 13th ribs (transverse) and between the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae (transverse and longitudinal), and GR. After slaughter, the measurements equivalent to ultrasound measurements were taken on digitized images of the cuts on the left half carcass of each lamb. Ultrasound GR and fat depth measurements were closely correlated with the corresponding carcass measurements (0.76 r 0.81). Ultrasound GR measurement exhibited a large error of central tendency, but the level of error due to the disturbance (ED) was comparable with fat depth measurements (ED = 8.5%; residual SD = 2.24 mm; CV of residuals = 9.5%). Ultrasound fat depth measurements were more accurate between the 12th and 13th ribs (error due to regression = 1.20; ED = 0.82) than between the 3rd and 4th lumbar vertebrae (error due to regression = 5.58 and 5.4; ED = 1.10 and 0.93, transverse and longitudinal, respectively), mainly due to image interpretation errors in the lumbar region. Measurements of LM depth demonstrated low variability in the population under study (SD = 2.6 mm), and these ultrasound measurements showed low correlation with the corresponding carcass measurements (0.34 r 0.43). The results of this study demonstrated that ultrasound measurements were more accurate for evaluating fat depth and the GR measurements than for estimating LM depths. Ultrasound GR measurement is a promising measurement, especially where carcass grading systems are based on this carcass measurement.

Key Words: fat depth • lamb • live measurement • loin muscle depth • total tissue depth measurement • ultrasound