J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:1540-1547. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-0934
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-0934v1
87/4/1540    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcelos, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, L. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vasconcelos, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Greene, L. W.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effects of different growing diets on performance, carcass characteristics, insulin sensitivity, and accretion of intramuscular and subcutaneous adipose tissue of feedlot cattle

J. T. Vasconcelos*,{dagger},1,2, J. E. Sawyer{dagger}, L. O. Tedeschi{dagger}, F. T. McCollum* and L. W. Greene*,3

* Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center, Amarillo 79106; and {dagger} Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843

1 Corresponding author: jvasconcelos2{at}unl.edu

Forty-eight individually fed crossbred steers (British and British x Continental; BW = 296 ± 16.7 kg) were used to evaluate effects of different growing diets on changes in accretion of intramuscular (IMF) and subcutaneous (SCF) adipose tissues, insulin sensitivity, and carcass traits. Dietary treatments were AL-LC (a low-corn diet fed to allow cattle ad libitum access to feed), AL-HC (a high-corn diet fed to allow cattle ad libitum access to feed), LF-HC (a limit fed high-corn diet with the energy intake equal to that provided by AL-LC), and AL-IC (a diet with approximately the midpoint daily energy intake between AL-LC and AL-HC). Steers received treatments until d 56, after which all groups were fed AL-HC until d 140. Real-time ultrasound and BW measurements were taken every 28 d, and 3 glucose tolerance tests (GTT) were conducted on d 0, 28, and 56 of the growing period to assess insulin sensitivity. Based on ultrasound IMF and SCF readings during the growing phase, AL-HC and AL-IC increased accretion of IMF (P = 0.01), and AL-LC and LF-HC diets resulted in less accretion of SCF (P < 0.01) compared with other treatments. During the finishing period, accretion of IMF (P = 0.13) and SCF (P = 0.81) did not differ among treatments, which diluted differences in overall (d 0 to 140) accretion of IMF (P = 0.28) and SCF (P = 0.52), such that final real-time ultrasound measures of IMF and SCF did not differ (P ≥ 0.36) among treatments. Actual carcass marbling scores, however, were greater for the AL-HC and AL-IC treatments (P = 0.02), and 12th-rib fat thickness tended (P = 0.08) to be greater for AL-HC and AL-IC groups. Based on incremental area under the curve and area over the curve as indicators of insulin release and glucose uptake, respectively, no differences (P ≥ 0.10) in insulin sensitivity were observed among treatments. Our results suggest that high-corn diets increase growing phase accretion of IMF and SCF; however, these differences were not related to differences in glucose and insulin kinetics.

Key Words: beef cattle • growing diet • insulin sensitivity • marbling




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. D. Rhoades, J. E. Sawyer, C. H. Ponce, D. K. Lunt, and S. B. Smith
Substrate utilization and dose response to insulin by subcutaneous adipose tissue of Angus steers fed corn- or hay-based diets
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2009; 87(7): 2338 - 2345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.