| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTION |
,1
* Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078;
and
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843; and
Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins 80523
1 Corresponding author: g-carstens{at}tamu.edu
The objectives of this study were to characterize feed efficiency traits and to examine phenotypic correlations between performance and feeding behavior traits, and ultrasound measurements of carcass composition in growing bulls. Individual DMI and feeding behavior traits were measured in Angus bulls (n = 341; initial BW = 371.1 ± 50.8 kg) fed a corn silage-based diet (ME = 2.77 Mcal/kg of DM) for 84 d in trials 1 and 2 and for 70 d in trials 3 and 4 by using a GrowSafe feeding system. Meal duration (min/d) and meal frequency (events/d) were calculated for each bull from feeding behavior recorded by the GrowSafe system. Ultrasound measures of carcass 12th-rib fat thickness (BF) and LM area (LMA) were obtained at the start and end of each trial. Residual feed intake (RFIp) was computed from the linear regression of DMI on ADG and midtest BW0.75 (metabolic BW, MBW), with trial, trial by ADG, and trial by midtest BW0.75 as random effects (base model). Overall ADG, DMI, and RFIp were 1.44 (SD = 0.29), 9.46 (SD = 1.31), and 0.00 (SD = 0.78) kg/d, respectively. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that inclusion of BW gain in BF and LMA in the base model increased R2 (0.76 vs. 0.78) and accounted for 9% of the variation in DMI not explained by MBW and ADG (RFIp). Residual feed intake and carcass-adjusted residual feed intake (RFIc) were moderately correlated with DMI (0.60 and 0.55, respectively) and feed conversion ratio (FCR; 0.49 and 0.45, respectively), and strongly correlated with partial efficiency of growth (PEG; –0.84 and –0.78, respectively), but not with ADG or MBW. Gain in BF was weakly correlated with RFIp (0.30), FCR (–0.15), and PEG (–0.11), but not with RFIc. Gain in LMA was weakly correlated with RFIp (0.17) and FCR (–0.19), but not with PEG or RFIc. The Spearman rank correlation between RFIp and RFIc was high (0.91). Meal duration (0.41), head-down duration (0.38), and meal frequency (0.26) were correlated with RFIp and accounted for 35% of the variation in DMI not explained by MBW, ADG, and ultrasound traits (RFIc). These results suggest that adjusting residual feed intake for carcass composition will facilitate selection to reduce feed intake in cattle without affecting rate or composition of gain.
Key Words: Angus bull • carcass composition • feeding behavior • residual feed intake
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. K. Kelly, M. McGee, D. H. Crews Jr., A. G. Fahey, A. R. Wylie, and D. A. Kenny Effect of divergence in residual feed intake on feeding behavior, blood metabolic variables, and body composition traits in growing beef heifers J Anim Sci, January 1, 2010; 88(1): 109 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Lancaster, G. E. Carstens, D. H. Crews Jr., T. H. Welsh Jr., T. D. A. Forbes, D. W. Forrest, L. O. Tedeschi, R. D. Randel, and F. M. Rouquette Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers J Anim Sci, December 1, 2009; 87(12): 3887 - 3896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. M. Bingham, T. H. Friend, P. A. Lancaster, and G. E. Carstens Relationship between feeding behavior and residual feed intake in growing Brangus heifers J Anim Sci, August 1, 2009; 87(8): 2685 - 2689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
