J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:1013-1023. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1169
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE
This Article
Free Via Open Access
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1169v1
87/3/1013    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, T. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Montgomery, T. H.

ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effects of dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics of beef steers fed with and without monensin and tylosin

J. L. Montgomery*,1, C. R. Krehbiel{dagger}, J. J. Cranston{dagger}, D. A. Yates*, J. P. Hutcheson*, W. T. Nichols*, M. N. Streeter*, R. S. Swingle{ddagger} and T. H. Montgomery§

* Intervet Inc., Millsboro, DE 19966; and {dagger} Department of Animal Science, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078; and {ddagger} Cactus Research Ltd., Amarillo, TX 79116; and § Division of Agriculture, West Texas A&M University, Canyon 79016

1 Corresponding author: jayden.montgomery{at}targacept.com

A feedlot experiment was conducted under commercial conditions in the Texas Panhandle using 3,757 feedlot steers (average of 94 steers/pen) to evaluate the effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with or without monensin and tylosin on feedlot performance and carcass characteristics. The experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design. Treatments were arranged as a 2 (no zilpaterol vs. zilpaterol) x 2 (monensin and tylosin withdrawn vs. monensin and tylosin fed during the final 35 d on feed) factorial. Steers were fed for a total of 161 to 167 d, and treatments were administered during the final 35 d that cattle were on feed. When included in the diet, zilpaterol, monensin, and tylosin were supplemented at 8.3, 33.1, and 12.2 mg/kg (DM basis), respectively. Zilpaterol was included in the diet for 30 d at the end of the finishing period and withdrawn from the diet for the last 5 or 6 d cattle were on feed. Cattle were harvested and carcass data collected. There were no zilpaterol x monensin/tylosin interactions (P ≥ 0.12) for ADG or G:F. Feeding zilpaterol increased ADG (P < 0.001) by 0.20 kg and G:F (P < 0.001) by 0.029 kg/kg during the last 35 d on feed. Likewise, when feedlot variables were measured throughout the entire 161- to 167-d feeding trial, ADG (3.4%; P < 0.001) and G:F (3.9%; P < 0.001) were increased. Feeding zilpaterol increased (P < 0.001) dressing percent and HCW and decreased (P < 0.001) total liver abscess rate compared with controls. In addition, zilpaterol increased (P < 0.001) LM area by an average of 8.0 cm2. There was a zilpaterol x monensin/tylosin interaction (P = 0.03) for marbling score. Zilpaterol decreased (P < 0.001) marbling score regardless of monensin and tylosin treatment, although withdrawal of monensin and tylosin for 35 d decreased marbling to a greater extent (31 vs. 17 degrees). Zilpaterol decreased (i.e., improved; P < 0.001) calculated yield grade regardless of monensin and tylosin treatment, but feeding zilpaterol in combination with the withdrawal of monensin and tylosin for 35 d decreased calculated yield grade to a greater extent (0.49 vs. 0.29) compared with the zilpaterol, monensin, and tylosin combination treatment (zilpaterol x monensin/tylosin interaction, P = 0.03). Results suggest that monensin and tylosin can be withdrawn from the diet during the zilpaterol feeding period (final 35 d on feed) with minimal effect on animal performance, although feeding zilpaterol in combination with monensin and tylosin seemed to moderate effects on carcass quality.

Key Words: β-adrenergic agonist • beef cattle • carcass merit • finishing performance • zilpaterol hydrochloride




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. D. Etherton
ASAS Centennial Paper: Animal growth and development research: Historical perspectives
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 3060 - 3064.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. C. Robles-Estrada, A. A. Arrizon, A. Barreras, J. F. Calderon, F. Figueroa-Saavedra, N. Torrentera, A. Plascencia, and R. A. Zinn
Effects of preslaughter withdrawal period on response of feedlot heifers to zilpaterol hydrochloride supplementation: Growth performance and carcass characteristics
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1759 - 1763.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. G. Hilton, J. L. Montgomery, C. R. Krehbiel, D. A. Yates, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, M. N. Streeter, J. R. Blanton Jr., and M. F. Miller
Effects of feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride with and without monensin and tylosin on carcass cutability and meat palatability of beef steers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1394 - 1406.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Montgomery, C. R. Krehbiel, J. J. Cranston, D. A. Yates, J. P. Hutcheson, W. T. Nichols, M. N. Streeter, D. T. Bechtol, E. Johnson, T. TerHune, et al.
Dietary zilpaterol hydrochloride. I. Feedlot performance and carcass traits of steers and heifers
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1374 - 1383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.