J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2009. 87:3596-3606. doi:10.2527/jas.2008-1609
© 2009 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2008-1609v1
87/11/3596    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamalakar, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nadarajah, N. K.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamalakar, R. B.
Right arrow Articles by Nadarajah, N. K.

NONRUMINANT NUTRITION

Effect of the degree and duration of early dietary amino acid restrictions on subsequent and overall pig performance and physical and sensory characteristics of pork1

R. B. Kamalakar*, L. I. Chiba*,2, K. C. Divakala*, S. P. Rodning*, E. G. Welles{dagger}, W. G. Bergen*, C. R. Kerth*, D. L. Kuhlers* and N. K. Nadarajah*

* Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, and {dagger} Department of Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849

2 Corresponding author: chibale{at}auburn.edu

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of the degree and duration of early dietary AA restrictions on subsequent and overall pig performance and physical and sensory characteristics of pork. For the grower (G) and finisher-1 (F1) phases, 3 corn-soybean meal diets were formulated to contain 100, 80, or 60% of the 1998 NRC total Lys recommendations (100G, 80G, or 60G, and 100F1, 80F1, or 60F1, for the G and F1 phases, respectively). For the finisher-2 (F2) phase, a common corn-soybean meal diet was formulated to satisfy the 1998 NRC total Lys recommendation. Thirty gilts and 30 castrated males (2 gilts or 2 castrated males/pen) were randomly assigned to 5 dietary treatments (100G-100F1, 80G-100F1, 80G-80F1, 60G-100F1, and 60G-60F1) when BW was 22.7 ± 0.3 kg. Pigs were switched to F1 and F2 diets at 50.7 ± 0.4 and 79.9 ± 0.5 kg of BW, respectively. Pigs had ad libitum access to feed and water. All pigs were slaughtered at 110.7 ± 0.5 kg of BW, and LM samples were collected. Pigs fed the 60G diet had less (P ≤ 0.05) ADG during the G phase and greater (P ≤ 0.05) ultrasound backfat (UBF) at the end of the G phase than those fed the 100G diet. The ADG decreased linearly (R2 = 0.70; P < 0.001) as the degree of AA restrictions became more severe. Although serum total protein (TP) and albumin concentrations in pigs fed the 60G-100F1 diets were less (P ≤ 0.05) than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets at the end of the G phase, TP concentration was similar between the 2 groups at the end of the F1 phase. Likewise, ADG during the F1 phase and UBF at the end of the F1 phase in pigs fed the 60G-100F1 diets were similar to those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. Feeding the 80G diet resulted in numerically decreased ADG during the G phase, but there was no difference in ADG during the F1 and F2 phases or UBF at the end of F1 and F2 phases between pigs fed the 80G and 100G diets. Overall, pigs fed the 80G-80F1 diets had similar ADG, but less (P ≤ 0.05) fat-free lean gain (LG) than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. These pigs also had less (P ≤ 0.05) serum TP and albumin concentrations than pigs fed the 100G-100F1 diets throughout the study. Pigs fed the 60G-60F1 diets had less (P ≤ 0.05) overall ADG and G:F and less (P ≤ 0.05) LM area and LG than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. However, they had a greater (P ≤ 0.05) subjective marbling score than those fed the 100G-100F1 diets. The results indicated that pigs fed the 80G-80F1 diets may have exhibited compensatory growth in BW gain, but not in terms of lean accretion. Growth performance and carcass traits of pigs fed the 60G-60F1 diets were reduced, indicating that the restriction may have been too severe or too long or both. Early dietary AA restrictions had no clear effect on physical and sensory characteristics of pork.

Key Words: carcass trait • early amino acid restriction • growth performance • physical and sensory pork characteristic • pig • serum metabolite




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
R. Barretero-Hernandez, M. L. Galyean, and J. A. Vizcarra
The Effect of Feed Restriction on Plasma Ghrelin, Growth Hormone, Insulin, and Glucose Tolerance in Pigs
Professional Animal Scientist, February 1, 2010; 26(1): 26 - 34.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Animal Science.