HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0644v1 86/5/1245    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Patra, A. K. Articles by Goetsch, A. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Patra, A. K. Articles by Goetsch, A. L.

Technical Note: Effects of tethering on herbage selection, intake and digestibility, grazing behavior, and energy expenditure by Boer x Spanish goats grazing high-quality herbage¹

A. K. Patra^*, R. Puchala^*, G. Detweiler^*, L. J. Dawson, T. Sahlu^* and A. L. Goetsch^*,2

^* E. (Kika) de la Garza American Institute for Goat Research, Langston University, Langston, OK 73050; and College of Veterinary Medicine, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078

² Corresponding author: goetsch{at}luresext.edu.

Twenty-four yearling Boer x Spanish goats were used in a crossover experiment to determine the effects of tethering on herbage selection, intake and digestibility, grazing behavior, and energy expenditure (EE) with high-quality herbage. Four 0.72-ha paddocks of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and berseem clover (Trifolium alexandrium) were grazed in the spring. Each paddock hosted 6 animals, 3 with free movement and 3 attached to a 3-m tether that was moved daily and provided access to an area of 28.3 m². One animal of each treatment and paddock was used to determine herbage selection, fecal output, or grazing behavior and EE. Herbage DM mass in tethered areas before grazing averaged 2,649 and 2,981 kg/ha in periods 1 and 2, respectively. The CP concentration in ingesta was greater (P < 0.05; 23.1 and 20.3 ± 0.82%) for free vs. tethered animals, although in vitro true DM digestion (75.7 and 76.5 ± 1.20%, respectively) did not differ (P > 0.05) between treatments. Intake of ME based on in vitro true DM digestion and fecal output was greater (P < 0.05) for free vs. tethered animals (12.7 and 10.4 ± 0.89 MJ/d). No treatment effects were observed (P > 0.05) for time spent ruminating or grazing (405 and 366 ± 42.5 min/d, respectively), although mean EE was greater (P < 0.05) for free vs. tethered animals (633 and 512 ± 27.4 kJ/kg of BW^0.75 for free and tethered, respectively), with differences (P < 0.05) between treatments at each hour of the day. Tethering animals may be acceptable to model those with free movement for some measures such as ingesta composition but appears inappropriate for others, such as energy metabolism.

Key Words: energy • goat • grazing • tethering

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Puchala, I. Tovar-Luna, T. Sahlu, H. C. Freetly, and A. L. Goetsch Technical Note: The relationship between heart rate and energy expenditure in growing crossbred Boer and Spanish wethers J Anim Sci, May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1714 - 1721. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. Sahlu, L. J. Dawson, T. A. Gipson, S. P. Hart, R. C. Merkel, R. Puchala, Z. Wang, S. Zeng, and A. L. Goetsch ASAS Centennial Paper: Impact of animal science research on United States goat production and predictions for the future J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 400 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]