| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL NUTRITION |
,,#,2
* Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock 79409;
and
Department of Animal Science, Texas A&M University, College Station 77843;
and
National Institute of Animal Science-RDA, Cheonan, Korea 330-801;
and
USDA-ARS-Livestock Issues Research Unit, Lubbock, TX 79403; and
# Department of Animal Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh 27695
2 Corresponding author: sungwoo_kim{at}ncsu.edu
A 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments in a randomized block design was used to determine the effects of dietary Arg supplementation during gestation and lactation on the lactation performance of 38 first-parity sows. At 30 d of gestation, pregnant gilts were allotted based on BW to 1 of 2 diets supplemented with 1% L-Arg·HCl or 1.7% L -Ala (isonitrogenous control). After farrowing, sows were further allotted based on BW within previous gestation treatment groups to 1 of 2 lactation diets supplemented with 1% L-Arg·HCl or 1.7% L-Ala (isonitrogenous control). All gestation diets contained 3.1 Mcal/kg and 12.2% CP (as is) and were fed 2 kg/d in 2 equally sized meals, whereas all lactation diets contained 3.2 Mcal/kg and 18.6% CP (as is) and were fed ad libitum. Litter size was standardized to 10 piglets by cross-fostering within 24 h postfarrowing. On a weekly basis, BW and backfat (BF) thickness of sows, as well as piglet BW were measured, and blood and milk samples were obtained from the sows. Number of days from weaning to estrus and ADFI were also recorded. There were no differences in BW, BF thickness, ADFI, or days until return to estrus among treatment groups. There was no effect of the gestation diet or a gestation x lactation diet interaction on any parameter measured. On d 7 of lactation, plasma concentrations of Arg and insulin in sows, as well as concentrations of most AA in milk, were greater (P < 0.05) in response to Arg supplementation during lactation compared with the control. Weight gain of piglets from sows fed the Arg-supplemented diet during lactation was greater between d 0 and 7 (P < 0.01) and between d 0 and 21 (P < 0.05) of lactation compared with piglets from sows fed the control diet. Collectively, results from this study indicate the potential beneficial effects of dietary Arg supplementation in improving the lactation performance of first-parity sows.
Key Words: L-arginine • lactation performance • litter weight gain • sow
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. P. Laspiur, J. L. Burton, P. S. D. Weber, J. Moore, R. N. Kirkwood, and N. L. Trottier Dietary Protein Intake and Stage of Lactation Differentially Modulate Amino Acid Transporter mRNA Abundance in Porcine Mammary Tissue J. Nutr., September 1, 2009; 139(9): 1677 - 1684. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Li, D. A. Knabe, S. W. Kim, C. J. Lynch, S. M. Hutson, and G. Wu Lactating Porcine Mammary Tissue Catabolizes Branched-Chain Amino Acids for Glutamine and Aspartate Synthesis J. Nutr., August 1, 2009; 139(8): 1502 - 1509. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. W. Kim, W. L. Hurley, G. Wu, and F. Ji Ideal amino acid balance for sows during gestation and lactation J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E123 - E132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
