HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0625v1 86/2/460    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schinckel, A. P. Articles by Einstein, M. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schinckel, A. P. Articles by Einstein, M. E.

Growth of protein, moisture, lipid, and ash of two genetic lines of barrows and gilts from twenty to one hundred twenty-five kilograms of body weight¹

A. P. Schinckel^*,2, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman and M. E. Einstein^*

^* Department of Animal Sciences, Purdue University, 915 West State Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2054; and The Ohio State University and the Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Columbus 43210-1095

² Corresponding author: aschinck{at}purdue.edu

Two genetic lines of barrows and gilts with different lean growth rates were used to determine the BW and chemical composition growth from 23 to 125 kg of BW. The experiment was a 2 x 2 x 5 factorial arrangement of treatments in a completely randomized design conducted in 2 replicates. Six pigs from each sex and genetic line were killed at approximately 25-kg intervals from 23 kg to 125 kg of BW. At slaughter, tissues were collected and weighed. All components were ground and frozen until analyzed for water, protein, lipid, and ash. Serial BW data were fitted to alternative functions of day of age. Based on Akaike’s information criteria values, the random effects model, BW_{i, t} = (1 + c_i)(b₀ + b₁t + b₂t²), was the best mixed model equation. The chemical component mass data were fitted to alternative functions of BW. The allometric function, chemical component mass = aBW^b, provided the best fit to the data. Daily deposition rates of each chemical component were predicted by using the derivatives of the 2 functions. The overall ADG of the 2 genetic lines were not different. Barrows had 0.052 kg/d greater (P = 0.03) ADG than gilts. Allometric growth coefficients for all 4 chemical components were different (P < 0.01) for each genetic line. Allometric coefficients and predicted relative growth (g/kg of BW gain) for protein and moisture mass were greater (P < 0.01) for the high lean-gain pigs than the low lean-gain pigs. Allometric coefficients for lipid mass were smaller (P = 0.001) for the high lean-gain pigs than the low lean-gain pigs overall. Allometric coefficients and predicted relative growth rates for lipid mass were greater (P < 0.01) and for moisture and protein mass were lesser (P < 0.002) than the gilts. Compared with low lean-gain pigs, high lean-gain pigs had (1) 32.8% lesser predicted daily rates of lipid deposition (200 vs. 305 ± 80 g/d), with the difference increasing from 23 to 37% from 25 to 125 kg of BW; (2) 12.3% greater daily rates of protein deposition (118.7 vs. 106.0 ± 3.3 g/d); and (3) 18.8% greater predicted daily moisture accretion rates (423 vs. 356 ± 9 g/d). Overall, barrows had 21.3% greater lipid deposition (279 vs. 230 ± 78.2 g/d) than gilts. In this study, barrows and gilts had similar predicted daily moisture, protein, and ash accretion rates.

Key Words: chemical composition • genotype • growth • pig

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. P. Schinckel, D. C. Mahan, T. G. Wiseman, and M. E. Einstein Impact of Alternative Energy Systems on the Estimated Feed Requirements of Pigs with Varying Lean and Fat Tissue Growth Rates When Fed Corn and Soybean Meal-Based Diets Professional Animal Scientist, June 1, 2008; 24(3): 198 - 207. [Abstract] [PDF]