J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2008. 86:419-431. doi:10.2527/jas.2007-0362
© 2008 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2007-0362v1
86/2/419    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by González, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bach, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by González, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bach, A.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effect of the number of concentrate feeding places per pen on performance, behavior, and welfare indicators of Friesian calves during the first month after arrival at the feedlot1

L. A. González*,§,2, A. Ferret*,§,3, X. Manteca*,§, J. L. Ruíz-de-la-Torre*,§, S. Calsamiglia*,§, M. Devant{dagger},§ and A. Bach{dagger},{ddagger},§

* Departament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain; and {dagger} Unitat de Remugants-IRTA, 08140 Caldes de Montbui, and and {ddagger} ICREA, Barcelona, Spain; and § Animal Nutrition, Management, and Welfare Research Group, Barcelona, Spain

3 Corresponding author: Alfred.Ferret{at}uab.es

Seventy-two Friesian calves (BW = 102.0 ± 1.8 kg) were bought from a commercial calf farm and distributed to a factorial arrangement of treatments in a complete block design with 3 treatments and 3 blocks of similar fasted BW to study the effect of increasing the number of feeding places per pen on performance, behavior, and welfare indicators during the 4 wk after arrival. Treatments consisted of 1 (T1), 2 (T2), or 4 (T4) concentrate feeding places/pen (8 calves/pen). Concentrate and straw were fed at 0830 in individual feeders, and animals were allowed to consume on an ad libitum basis. Dry matter intake and ADG were recorded weekly, and blood samples were taken on d 0 (before transport), 7, 14, 21, and 28. Time spent in maintenance activities, number of displacements between calves, and the angular dominance value (ADV) were registered at wk 1 and 3 after arrival. Increasing the number of feeding places per pen resulted in a quadratic response of concentrate and total DMI, ADG, and BW during the 28-d period, with T1 showing the lowest values. Straw intake and the within-pen SD of ADG tended to decrease linearly (P = 0.10) as the number of feeding places per pen increased. During the 4-wk receiving period, and particularly on d 7 after arrival, serum NEFA responded quadratically, with T1 and T2 calves showing the greatest values. With increasing number of concentrate feeders, the average time spent lying increased (P = 0.001), standing time decreased linearly (P = 0.001), and the diurnal feeding pattern changed (concentrate eating time increased but straw eating time decreased during peak feeding times, P < 0.05). The number of displacements from the concentrate feeders responded quadratically (P < 0.001) with increasing number of feeding places per pen, with T4 calves showing the lowest levels of aggression. In T1 calves, increasing ADV resulted in a linear decrease (P = 0.03) of ADG at wk 1 with a quadratic effect at wk 3 (P < 0.01). In T2 calves, increasing ADV resulted in a linear decrease (P = 0.04) of ADG at wk 1 but a linear increase (P = 0.02) at wk 3. No effect of social rank on ADG was observed in T4 calves (P > 0.20). Increasing social pressure at the concentrate feeders beyond the threshold of 4 heifers per feeder had a negative effect on performance. Within-pen variability in performance increased linearly as a consequence of greater effects of social dominance. Physiological indicators of welfare were not consistently affected by treatments.

Key Words: behavior • calf • feeding place • performance • welfare




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
T. J. DeVries and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk
Competition for feed affects the feeding behavior of growing dairy heifers
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2009; 92(8): 3922 - 3929.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. A. Gonzalez, L. B. Correa, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. Ruiz-de-la-Torre, and S. Calsamiglia
Intake, water consumption, ruminal fermentation, and stress response of beef heifers fed after different lengths of delays in the daily feed delivery time
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2009; 87(8): 2709 - 2718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. A. Gonzalez, A. Ferret, X. Manteca, J. L. Ruiz-de-la-Torre, S. Calsamiglia, M. Devant, and A. Bach
Performance, behavior, and welfare of Friesian heifers housed in pens with two, four, and eight individuals per concentrate feeding place
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2008; 86(6): 1446 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Animal Science.