HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0459v1 86/14_suppl/E140    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Windisch, W. Articles by Kroismayr, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Windisch, W. Articles by Kroismayr, A.

Use of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry¹

Department of Food Science and Technology, Division of Animal Food and Nutrition, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, 1180 Vienna, Austria

² Corresponding author: wilhelm.windisch{at}boku.ac.at

This article summarizes the experimental knowledge on efficacy, possible modes of action, and aspects of application of phytogenic products as feed additives for swine and poultry. Phytogenic feed additives comprise a wide variety of herbs, spices, and products derived thereof, and are mainly essential oils. The assumption that phytogenic compounds might improve the palatability of feed has not yet been confirmed by choice-feeding studies. Although numerous studies have demonstrated antioxidative and antimicrobial efficacy in vitro, respective experimental in vivo evidence is still quite limited. The same applies to the supposition that phytogenic compounds may specifically enhance activities of digestive enzymes and nutrient absorption. Nevertheless, a limited number of experimental comparisons of phytogenic feed additives with antibiotics and organic acids have suggested similar effects on the gut, such as reduced bacterial colony counts, fewer fermentation products (including ammonia and biogenic amines), less activity of the gut-associated lymphatic system, and a greater prececal nutrient digestion, probably reflecting an overall improved gut equilibrium. In addition, some phytogenic compounds seem to promote intestinal mucus production. Such effects may explain a considerable number of practical studies with swine and poultry reporting improved production performance after providing phytogenic feed additives. In total, available evidence indicates that phytogenic feed additives may add to the set of nonantibiotic growth promoters for use in livestock, such as organic acids and probiotics. However, a systematic approach toward the efficacy and safety of phytogenic compounds used as feed additives for swine and poultry is still missing.

Key Words: antimicrobial • botanical • essential oil • herb • phytogenic • swine

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. G. Manzanilla, J. F. Perez, M. Martin, J. C. Blandon, F. Baucells, C. Kamel, and J. Gasa Dietary protein modifies effect of plant extracts in the intestinal ecosystem of the pig at weaning J Anim Sci, June 1, 2009; 87(6): 2029 - 2037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Kim, M. Z. Fan, and T. J. Applegate Nonruminant Nutrition symposium on natural phytobiotics for health of young animals and poultry: Mechanisms and application J Anim Sci, April 1, 2008; 86(14_suppl): E138 - E139. [Full Text] [PDF]