HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0565v1 86/12/3575    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Leheska, J. M. Articles by Miller, M. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Leheska, J. M. Articles by Miller, M. F.

Effects of conventional and grass-feeding systems on the nutrient composition of beef¹

J. M. Leheska^*, L. D. Thompson^*, J. C. Howe, E. Hentges, J. Boyce^*, J. C. Brooks^*, B. Shriver^*, L. Hoover^* and M. F. Miller^*,2

^* Texas Tech University, International Center for Food Industry Excellence and Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Lubbock 79409; and USDA-ARS-Beltsville, Human Nutrition Research Center, Nutrient Data Laboratory, Beltsville, MD 20705; and ILSI North America, Washington, DC 20005

² Corresponding author: mfmrraider{at}aol.com

The objectives of this study were to determine the nutrient composition of grass-fed beef in the United States for inclusion in the USDA National Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, and to compare the fatty acid composition of grass-fed and conventionally fed (control) beef. Ground beef (GB) and strip steaks (SS) were collected on 3 separate occasions from 15 grass-fed beef producers that represented 13 different states, whereas control beef samples were collected from 3 regions (Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas) of the United States on 3 separate occasions. Concentrations of minerals, choline, vitamin B₁₂, and thiamine were determined for grass-fed beef samples. Grass-fed GB samples had less Mg, P, and K (P < 0.05), and more Na, Zn, and vitamin B₁₂ (P < 0.05) than SS samples. Fat color, marbling, and pH were assessed for grass-fed and control SS. Subjective evaluation of the SS indicated that grass-fed beef had fat that was more yellow in color than control beef. Percentages of total fat, total cholesterol, and fatty acids along with trans fatty acids and CLA were determined for grass-fed and control SS and GB. Grass-fed SS had less total fat than control SS (P = 0.001), but both grass-fed and control SS were considered lean, because their total fat content was 4.3% or less. For both GB and SS, grass-fed beef had significantly less (P = 0.001 and P = 0.023, respectively) content of MUFA and a greater content of SFA, n-3 fatty acids, CLA, and trans-vaccenic acid than did the control samples. Concentrations of PUFA, trans fatty acids, n-6 fatty acids, and cholesterol did not differ between grass-fed and control ground beef. Trans-vaccenic acid (trans-11 18:1) made up the greatest concentration of the total trans fats in grass-fed beef, whereas CLA accounted for approximately 15% of the total trans fats. Although the fatty acid composition of grass-fed and conventionally fed beef was different, conclusions on the possible effects of these differences on human health cannot be made without further investigation.

Key Words: beef • conjugated linoleic acid • conventionally fed • fatty acid • grass-fed • nutrient composition

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. K. Duckett, J. P. S. Neel, J. P. Fontenot, and W. M. Clapham Effects of winter stocker growth rate and finishing system on: III. Tissue proximate, fatty acid, vitamin, and cholesterol content J Anim Sci, September 1, 2009; 87(9): 2961 - 2970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. J. Hausman, M. V. Dodson, K. Ajuwon, M. Azain, K. M. Barnes, L. L. Guan, Z. Jiang, S. P. Poulos, R. D. Sainz, S. Smith, et al. BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: The biology and regulation of preadipocytes and adipocytes in meat animals J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(4): 1218 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]