|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ANIMAL PRODUCTS |

* Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506; and
Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University, Ames 50011
3 Corresponding author: mdikeman{at}ksu.edu
This research explores the relationship between generally accepted and alternative cattle age-prediction methods and chronological age. Cattle (n = 386) of documented ages ranging from 370 to 1,115 d of age were used. Dentition (DEN), USDA maturity score (MS), lens weight (LW), and lens total N (LN) content were used as possible predictors of age. Correlations with age were determined: LW (r = 0.77); DEN (r = 0.74); LN (r = 0.71); and MS (r = 0.64). Stepwise backward regression was used to generate an age prediction equation: Age (mo) = –21.79 + 17.23(LW, g) + 0.038(DEN). By this equation, 38% of cattle
20 mo of age were verified as
20 mo of age. Independent measures verified the following percentages of cattle as
20 mo of age: LW (20.2%), MS (11.0%), DEN (9.6%), and LN (8.7%). The DEN verified that 87.6% were verified as <30 mo old, and LW verified 81.6% of cattle as <30 mo old. A separate group of cattle (n = 18) ranging in age from 1 to 12 yr were evaluated for lens properties, for which LW (R2 = 0.91) and LN (R2 = 0.92) were highly correlated with age. The LW and DEN were the best predictors of age for cattle 13- to 37-mo-old and yielded the most accurate age prediction when used in combination (R2 = 0.67).
Key Words: age verification cattle maturity dentition lens
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |