HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0271v1 86/11/3054    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Quinn, M. J. Articles by Drouillard, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Quinn, M. J. Articles by Drouillard, J. S.

The effects of feeding flaxseed during the receiving period on morbidity, mortality, performance, and carcass characteristics of heifers¹

M. J. Quinn^*, E. S. Moore, D. U. Thomson, B. E. Depenbusch^*, M. L. May^*, J. J. Higgins, J. F. Carter and J. S. Drouillard^*,2

^* Department of Animal Sciences and Industry and Department of Clinical Science and Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, 66506-1600 Department of Plant Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

² Corresponding author: jdrouill{at}ksu.edu

Two experiments were conducted at the Kansas State University Beef Cattle Research Center to determine the effects of feeding ground flaxseed (flax) during the receiving period on the growth, health, and subsequent finishing performance of heifers. Crossbred heifers (Exp. 1: n = 363, 214 ± 1 kg of initial BW; Exp. 2: n = 377, 222 ± 1 kg of initial BW) were purchased during January and April of 2006. Heifers were fed receiving rations based on steam-flaked corn with 0, 2, 4, or 6% ground flax (DM basis) for 56 d. Following the receiving period, cattle in Exp. 1 and 2 were fed steam-flaked corn-based diets for 150 and 147 d, respectively, and then slaughtered. Heifers were implanted 91 and 109 d before slaughter for Exp. 1 and 2, respectively. In Exp. 1, DMI during the receiving period tended to increase linearly (P = 0.09) with increasing flax in the diet. Average daily gain was 1.46, 1.56, 1.58, and 1.61 kg for heifers fed 0, 2, 4, and 6% flax, respectively (linear, P = 0.03). Final BW in Exp. 1 after the finishing period was increased (linear, P = 0.04) with increasing inclusion of flax in the receiving diets. In Exp. 2, growth performance and mortality during the receiving period were not different among treatments (P > 0.12). During the receiving period in Exp. 2, incidence of the first respiratory treatment tended to be greatest (P = 0.09) for heifers fed 4% flax. During the finishing period, DMI were 8.4, 8.4, 8.0, and 8.1 kg/d for 0, 2, 4, and 6% flax, respectively (linear, P = 0.05). In Exp. 2, LM areas were greatest (quadratic, P = 0.04) for cattle fed 2% flax at receiving. In general, feeding flax during the receiving period may have the potential to improve growth performance; however, performance between experiments was variable, and many factors excluding flax feeding may have contributed to this response.

Key Words: beef cattle • feedlot • flaxseed • heifer • receiving