J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:1933-1939. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-845
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-845v1
85/8/1933    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Busch, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, D. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Busch, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Patterson, D. J.

ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION

Comparison of progestin-based estrus synchronization protocols before fixed-time artificial insemination on pregnancy rate in beef heifers1

D. C. Busch*, D. J. Wilson*, D. J. Schafer{dagger}, N. R. Leitman*, J. K. Haden{dagger}, M. R. Ellersieck{ddagger}, M. F. Smith* and D. J. Patterson*,2

* Division of Animal Science, S132 ASRC, and and {ddagger} Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211; and {dagger} MFA Inc., Columbia, MO 65202

2 Corresponding author: pattersond{at}missouri.edu

The objective of the experiment was to compare pregnancy rates resulting from fixed-time AI after administration of either 1 of 2 controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based protocols. Heifers at 3 locations (location 1, n = 78; location 2, n = 61; and location 3, n = 78) were assigned to 1 of 2 treatments within reproductive tract scores (1 = immature to 5 = cycling) by age and BW. Heifers assigned to CIDR Select received a CIDR insert (1.38 g of progesterone) from d 0 to 14 followed by GnRH (100 µg, i.m.) 9 d after CIDR removal (d 23) and PGF2{alpha} (PG, 25 mg, i.m.) 7 d after GnRH treatment (d 30). Heifers assigned to CO-Synch + CIDR were administered GnRH and received a CIDR insert on d 23 and PG and CIDR removal on d 30. Heifers at location 1 were fitted with a HeatWatch estrus detection system transmitter from the time of PG until 24 d after fixed-time AI to allow for continuous estrus detection. Artificial insemination was performed at predetermined fixed times for heifers in both treatments at 72 or 54 h after PG for the CIDR Select and CO-Synch + CIDR groups, respectively. All heifers were administered GnRH at the time of AI. Blood samples were collected 10 d before and immediately before treatment initiation (d 0) to determine pretreatment estrous cyclicity (progesterone ≥ 0.5 ng/mL). At location 1, the estrous response during the synchronized period was greater (P = 0.06; 87 vs. 69%, respectively), and the variance for interval to estrus after PG was reduced among CIDR Select- (P < 0.01) compared with CO-Synch + CIDR-treated heifers. Fixed-time AI pregnancy rates were significantly greater (P = 0.02) after the CIDR Select protocol (62%) compared with the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol (47%). In summary, the CIDR Select protocol resulted in a greater and more synchronous estrous response and significantly greater fixed-time AI pregnancy rates compared with the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol.

Key Words: artificial insemination • beef heifer • estrus synchronization • pregnancy rate • progestin




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Patterson, A. Wellen, M. Hahn, A. Pasternak, J. Lowe, S. DeHaas, D. Kraus, N. Williams, and G. Foxcroft
Responses to delayed estrus after weaning in sows using oral progestagen treatment
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1996 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. A. Mallory, D. J. Wilson, M. C. Lucy, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson
Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1808 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.