J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:1086-1091. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-493
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-493v1
85/4/1086    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koketsu, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koketsu, Y.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Longevity and efficiency associated with age structures of female pigs and herd management in commercial breeding herds1

Y. Koketsu2

School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Kawasaki 214-8571 Japan

2 Corresponding author: koket001{at}isc.meiji.ac.jp

Annual performance measurements, age structures of female pig inventories, and by-parity culling rates were abstracted from data files of 110 herds that participated in a data-share program in Japan. Parity at culling was used as a prime measurement of longevity, whereas pigs weaned·mated female–1·year–1 (PWMFY) was a prime measurement of reproductive efficiency. High or low longevity herds were based on the greatest 50% of the herds or the remaining herds ranked by parity at culling, whereas high or low reproductive efficiency herds were grouped according to the greatest 50% of the herds or the remaining herds ranked by PWMFY. Measurements were analyzed as a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement, using the main effects of the 2 herd groups of longevity (high or low) and reproductive efficiency (high or low). Means of parity at culling and PWMFY were 4.6 (SD = 0.82) and 21.2 (SD = 3.02), respectively. The high longevity group had 1.27 greater parities at culling than the low longevity group (P < 0.05), but no differences between the high and low longevity groups were found in PWMFY (P = 0.21). No differences between the high and low efficiency groups were found in parity at culling (P = 0.50). No interactions between the longevity and efficiency groups were found on any longevity or efficiency measurement (P > 0.20). In herd management, the percentage of reserviced females and the percentage of multiple matings were associated with the longevity group and the efficiency group (P < 0.05). The high longevity group had lower culling rates in parity 0 to 6 than the low longevity group (P < 0.05), whereas no differences between the low and high efficiency groups were found in culling rates in parity 0 to 2 (P > 0.20). This study suggests that measures to achieve longevity and high reproductive efficiency in breeding herds do not conflict and that high reproductive efficiency and high longevity can be achieved.

Key Words: management • reproductive productivity • sow longevity • welfare




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
Y. Koketsu
Technical note: High-performing swine herds improved their reproductive performance differently from ordinary herds for five years
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2007; 85(11): 3110 - 3115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.