J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:841-847. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-337
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-337v1
85/3/841    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Funston, R. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Funston, R. N.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effects of dam nutrition on growth and reproductive performance of heifer calves1

J. L. Martin*, K. A. Vonnahme{dagger}, D. C. Adams*, G. P. Lardy{dagger} and R. N. Funston*,2

* University of Nebraska West Central Research & Extension Center, North Platte 69101; and and {dagger} Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105

2 Corresponding author: rfunston2{at}unl.edu

A 3-yr study was conducted with heifers (n = 170) whose dams were used in a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of treatments to determine the effects of late gestation (LG) or early lactation (EL) dam nutrition on subsequent heifer growth and reproduction. In LG, cows received 0.45 kg/d of a 42% CP supplement (PS) or no supplement (NS) while grazing dormant Sandhills range. During EL, cows from each late gestational treatment were fed cool-season grass hay or grazed sub-irrigated meadow. Cows were managed as a single herd for the remainder of the year. Birth date and birth weight of heifer calves were not affected (P > 0.10) by dam nutrition. Meadow grazing and PS increased (P = 0.02; P = 0.07) heifer 205-d BW vs. feeding hay and NS, respectively. Weight at prebreeding and pregnancy diagnosis were greater (P < 0.04) for heifers from PS dams but were unaffected by EL nutrition (P > 0.10). There was no effect (P > 0.10) of LG or EL dam nutrition on age at puberty or the percentage of heifers cycling before breeding. There was no difference (P > 0.10) in pregnancy rates due to EL treatment. Pregnancy rates were greater (P = 0.05) for heifers from PS dams, and a greater proportion (P = 0.005) of heifers from PS dams calved in the first 21 d of the heifers’ first calving season. Nutrition of the dams did not influence (P < 0.10) heifers’ average calving date, calving difficulty, and calf birth weight during the initial calving season. Weight at the beginning of the second breeding season was greater (P = 0.005) for heifers from PS dams but was not affected by maternal nutrition during EL (P > 0.10). Dam nutrition did not affect (P > 0.10) heifer ADG or G:F ratio. Heifers from PS dams had greater DMI (P = 0.09) and residual feed intake (P = 0.07) than heifers from NS cows if their dams were fed hay during EL but not if their dams grazed meadows. Heifers born to PS cows were heavier at weaning, prebreeding, first pregnancy diagnosis, and before their second breeding season. Heifers from cows that grazed meadows during EL were heavier at weaning but not postweaning. Despite similar ages at puberty and similar proportions of heifers cycling before the breeding season, a greater proportion of heifers from PS dams calved in the first 21 d of the heifers’ first calving season, and pregnancy rates were greater compared with heifers from NS dams. Collectively, these results provide evidence of a fetal programming effect on heifer postweaning BW and fertility.

Key Words: fertility • fetal programming • heifer development • maternal nutrition • protein supplement




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. M. Meyer, M. S. Kerley, R. L. Kallenbach, and T. L. Perkins
Comparison of Grazing Stockpiled Tall Fescue Versus Feeding Hay With or Without Supplementation for Gestating and Lactating Beef Cows During Winter
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 449 - 458.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. M. Larson, J. L. Martin, D. C. Adams, and R. N. Funston
Winter grazing system and supplementation during late gestation influence performance of beef cows and steer progeny
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1147 - 1155.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
H. C. Freetly, J. A. Nienaber, and T. Brown-Brandl
Partitioning of energy in pregnant beef cows during nutritionally induced body weight fluctuation
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 370 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.