J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:512-517. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-435
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casellas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Piedrafita, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Casellas, J.
Right arrow Articles by Piedrafita, J.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Survival analysis from birth to slaughter of Ripollesa lambs under semi-intensive management1

J. Casellas2, G. Caja, X. Such and J. Piedrafita

Grup de Recerca en Remugants, Departament de Ciéncia Animal i dels Aliments, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain

2 Corresponding author: joaquim.casellas{at}uab.es

The survivability from birth to slaughter of 1,487 Ripollesa lambs with a preslaughter overall mortality of 9.6% was studied under the proportional hazards framework, assuming a Weibull distribution for the baseline hazards function. A sire frailty model was fitted, with the common environment received by the lamb as an additional random source of variation. Common environment was considered time-dependent and was characterized by the dam and the contemporary lamb group during the preweaning and fattening periods, respectively. Only 3 fixed effects were statistically significant: the linear and quadratic effects of birth weight (P < 0.001), the relative position of the delivery within the lambing season (P < 0.001), and the presence of stillbirths or mummified fetuses within the litter (P < 0.05). Birth type and parity of the ewe were significant only when birth weight was removed from the model (P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). Nevertheless, the model including birth weight became preferable according to the Akaike’s information criterion. Survivability dramatically decreased with extreme birth weights, although it reached a survival probability greater than 93.5% within the 3.3 to 5.4 kg range, indicating an optimum birth weight range of Ripollesa lambs for survival purposes. The hazard ratio (HR) increased for births occurring within the last third of the lambing period (HR = 1.70; P < 0.05), as well as for primiparous ewes that lambed in December and January (HR = 5.36; P < 0.001). Survival probability decreased for lambs born from litters with 1 or more stillbirths or mummified fetuses (HR = 1.61; P < 0.05). The variance component estimated for sire variance (0.07) was clearly lower than that of the common environment (1.87), with a heritability estimate of 0.027.

Key Words: lamb survival • proportional hazard • Ripollesa breed • survival analysis




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Casellas, J. Piedrafita, G. Caja, and L. Varona
Analysis of founder-specific inbreeding depression on birth weight in Ripollesa lambs
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
H. Vehvilainen, A. Kause, C. Quinton, H. Koskinen, and T. Paananen
Survival of the Currently Fittest: Genetics of Rainbow Trout Survival Across Time and Space
Genetics, September 1, 2008; 180(1): 507 - 516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.