HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: jas.2007-0081v1 jas.2007-0081v2 85/12/3391    most recent Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kiran, D. Articles by Mutsvangwa, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kiran, D. Articles by Mutsvangwa, T.

Effects of barley grain processing and dietary ruminally degradable protein on urea nitrogen recycling and nitrogen metabolism in growing lambs¹

Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada S7N 5A8

² Corresponding author: tim.mutsvan{at}usask.ca

The objective of this study was to determine how interactions between dietary ruminally degradable protein (RDP) level and ruminally fermentable carbohydrate (RFC) alter urea N transfer to the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) and the utilization of this recycled urea N in rapidly growing lambs fed high-N diets. Four Suffolk ram lambs (34.8 ± 0.5 kg of BW) were used in a 4 x 4 Latin square design with 21-d periods and a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement of dietary treatments. The dietary factors studied were 1) dry-rolled vs. pelleted barley as the principal source of RFC and 2) dietary levels of RDP of 60 vs. 70% (% of CP). All diets contained 28.8 g of N/kg of DM. Experimental diets were composed of 80% concentrate mixture and 20% barley silage (DM basis) and were fed twice daily at 0900 and 1700 as total mixed rations. Nitrogen balance was measured from d 15 to 20, and urea N kinetics were measured from d 15 to 19 using intrajugular infusions of [¹⁵N¹⁵N]-urea. Nitrogen intake (P = 0.001) and fecal (P = 0.002) and urinary (P = 0.03) N excretion increased as dietary RDP level increased, but the method of barley processing had no effect. Feeding dry-rolled compared with pelleted barley (P = 0.04) as well as feeding 60% RDP compared with 70% RDP (P = 0.04) resulted in a greater N digestibility. Whole-body N retention was unaffected (P 0.74) by dietary treatment. Dietary treatment had no effect on endogenous production of urea N and its recycling to the GIT; however, across dietary treatments, endogenous production of urea N (45.8 to 50.9 g/d) exceeded N intake (42.3 to 47.9 g/d). Across dietary treatments, 30.6 to 38.5 g/d of urea N were recycled to the GIT, representing 0.67 to 0.74 of endogenous urea N production; however, 0.64 to 0.76 of urea N recycled to the GIT was returned to the ornithine cycle. In summary, although dietary treatment did not alter urea N kinetics, substantial amounts of hepatic urea N output were recycled to the GIT under the dietary conditions used in this study, and additional research is required to determine how this recycled urea N can be efficiently captured by bacteria within the GIT.

Key Words: nitrogen metabolism • processed barley • ruminally degradable protein • sheep • urea nitrogen recycling

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. N. Gozho, M. R. Hobin, and T. Mutsvangwa Interactions Between Barley Grain Processing and Source of Supplemental Dietary Fat on Nitrogen Metabolism and Urea-Nitrogen Recycling in Dairy Cows J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 247 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]