J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2007. 85:2631-2638. doi:10.2527/jas.2006-794
© 2007 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
jas.2006-794v1
85/10/2631    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stelzleni, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gwartney, B. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stelzleni, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Gwartney, B. L.

ANIMAL PRODUCTS

Benchmarking carcass characteristics and muscles from commercially identified beef and dairy cull cow carcasses for Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory attributes1

A. M. Stelzleni*,2, L. E. Patten{dagger}, D. D. Johnson*, C. R. Calkins{dagger} and B. L. Gwartney{ddagger}

* Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611; and {dagger} Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln 68583; and and {ddagger} National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, Englewood, CO 80155

2 Corresponding author: astelz{at}uga.edu

The objective of this study was to benchmark carcasses and muscles from commercially identified fed (animals that were perceived to have been fed an increased plane of nutrition before slaughter) and nonfed cull beef and dairy cows and A-maturity, USDA Select steers, so that the muscles could be identified from cull cow carcasses that may be used to fill a void of intermediately priced beef steaks. Carcass characteristics were measured at 24 h postmortem for 75 carcasses from 5 populations consisting of cull beef cows commercially identified as fed (B-F, n = 15); cull beef cows commercially identified as nonfed (B-NF, n = 15); cull dairy cows commercially identified as fed (D-F, n = 15); cull dairy cows commercially identified as nonfed (D-NF, n = 15); and A-maturity, USDA Select grade steers (SEL, n = 15). Nine muscles were excised from each carcass [m. infraspinatus, m. triceps brachii (lateral and long heads), m. teres major, m. longissimus dorsi (also termed LM), m. psoas major, m. gluteus medius, m. rectus femoris, and m. tensor fasciae latae] and subjected to Warner-Bratzler shear force testing and objective sensory panel evaluation after 14 d of postmortem aging. Carcass characteristics differed (P < 0.05) among the 5 commercially identified slaughter groups for the traits of lean maturity, bone maturity, muscle score, HCW, fat color, subjective lean color, marbling, ribeye area, 12th-rib fat thickness, and preliminary yield grade. Carcasses from commercially identified, fed cull cows exhibited more (P < 0.01) weight in carcass lean than did commercially identified, nonfed cull cows. There was a group x muscle interaction (P = 0.02) for Warner-Bratzler shear force. Warner-Bratzler shear force and sensory overall tenderness values demonstrates that muscles from the SEL group were the most tender (P < 0.01), whereas muscles from the B-NF group were the least tender (P < 0.01). Sensory, beef flavor intensity was similar (P > 0.20) among cull cow carcass groups and more intense (P < 0.01) than the SEL carcass group. Muscles from the SEL group exhibited less (P < 0.01) detectable off-flavor than the cull cow carcass groups, whereas the B-NF group exhibited the most (P < 0.01) detectable off-flavor. Although carcass and muscle quality from commercially identified, fed, cull beef and dairy cows was not similar to A-maturity, USDA Select beef, they did show improvements when compared with nonfed, cull, beef and dairy cow carcasses and muscles.

Key Words: cull cow • benchmarking • Warner-Bratzler • muscle




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. D. Allen, J. K. Ahola, M. Chahine, J. I. Szasz, C. W. Hunt, C. S. Schneider, G. K. Murdoch, and R. A. Hill
Effect of preslaughter feeding and ractopamine hydrochloride supplementation on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and end product quality in market dairy cows
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2009; 87(7): 2400 - 2408.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Neill, J. A. Unruh, T. T. Marston, J. R. Jaeger, M. C. Hunt, and J. J. Higgins
Effects of implanting and feeding zilpaterol hydrochloride on performance, carcass characteristics, and subprimal beef yields of fed cows
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 704 - 710.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
R. D. Dijkhuis, D. D. Johnson, and J. N. Carter
Case Study: Feeding Ractopamine Hydrochloride to Cull Cows: Effects on Carcass Composition, Warner-Bratzler Shear Force, and Yield
Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 634 - 638.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. E. Patten, J. M. Hodgen, A. M. Stelzleni, C. R. Calkins, D. D. Johnson, and B. L. Gwartney
Chemical properties of cow and beef muscles: Benchmarking the differences and similarities
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1904 - 1916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Animal Science.