|
|
||||||||
ANIMAL GENETICS |
,5
* Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43210-1095;
and
Department of Animal Science, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611-0901
4 Corresponding author: davis.28{at}osu.edu
Data for the current study were obtained from a divergent selection experiment in which the selection criterion was the average serum IGF-I concentrations of 3 postweaning blood samples collected from purebred Angus calves. Multiple-trait derivative-free REML procedures were used to obtain genetic parameter estimates for IGF-I concentrations and for BW and BW gains measured from birth to the conclusion of a 140-d postweaning performance test. Included in the analysis were 2,674 animals in the A1 matrix, 1,761 of which had valid records for IGF-I concentrations. Direct heritability estimates ± SE for IGF-I concentration at d 28, 42, and 56 of the postweaning period and for mean IGF-I concentrations were 0.44 ± 0.07, 0.51 ± 0.08, 0.42 ± 0.07, and 0.52 ± 0.08, respectively. Heritability estimates for maternal genetic effects ranged from 0.10 ± 0.05 to 0.20 ± 0.06. The proportion of total phenotypic variance due to the maternal permanent environmental effect was essentially zero for all measures of IGF-I concentrations. Genetic correlations of IGF-I concentrations with weaning and post-weaning BW ranged from 0.07 ± 0.12 to 0.32 ± 0.11 and generally demonstrated an increasing trend during the postweaning period. Averaged across the various measures of IGF-I, the genetic correlation of IGF-I with preweaning gain was 0.14, whereas the genetic correlation with postweaning gain was 0.29. Genetic correlations between IGF-I and BW gain were positive during all time intervals, except between weaning and the beginning of the postweaning test and from d 84 to 112 of the postweaning period. Environmental and phenotypic correlations of IGF-I with BW and BW gains were generally positive, but small. These results indicate that postweaning serum IGF-I concentration is moderately to highly heritable and has small positive genetic, environmental, and phenotypic correlations with BW other than birth weight and with pre- and postweaning gain. Therefore, if IGF-I proves to be a biological indicator of an economically important trait (e.g., efficiency of feed use for growth) in beef cattle, it should be possible to rapidly change IGF-I concentrations via selection without significantly altering live weight or rate of gain.
Key Words: beef cattle genetic parameter growth insulin-like growth factor selection
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. A. Afolayan and N. M. Fogarty Genetic variation of plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 in young crossbred ewes and its relationship with their maintenance feed intake at maturity and production traits J Anim Sci, September 1, 2008; 86(9): 2068 - 2075. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Estany, M. Tor, D. Villalba, L. Bosch, D. Gallardo, N. Jimenez, L. Altet, J. L. Noguera, J. Reixach, M. Amills, et al. Association of CA repeat polymorphism at intron 1 of insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) gene with circulating IGF-I concentration, growth, and fatness in swine Physiol Genomics, October 19, 2007; 31(2): 236 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Kahi and H. Hirooka Effect of direct and indirect selection criteria for efficiency of gain on profitability of Japanese Black cattle selection strategies J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2401 - 2412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |