J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2006. 84:1709-1721. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-465
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yi, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yi, G. F.
Right arrow Articles by Knight, C. D.

ANIMAL NUTRITION

Estimation of the true ileal digestible lysine and sulfur amino acid requirement and comparison of the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid and DL-methionine in eleven- to twenty-six-kilogram nursery pigs1,2

G. F. Yi*, A. M. Gaines{dagger}, B. W. Ratliff{dagger}, P. Srichana{dagger}, G. L. Allee{dagger},3, K. R. Perryman* and C. D. Knight*

* Novus International Inc., St. Louis, MO 63304; and {dagger} Animal Science Research Center, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211

3 Corresponding author: alleeg{at}missouri.edu

Three experiments were conducted to determine the true ileal digestible (TID) Lys and sulfur AA (SAA) requirement and to compare the bioefficacy of 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid (HMTBA) and DL-MET as Met sources in nursery pigs. Experiment 1 included 2 studies: 1 was 662 nursery pigs (Triumph 4 x PIC C22; initial BW 12.2 ± 0.18 kg) allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with TID Lys concentrations ranging from 1.10 to 1.50%; and the second study was 665 nursery pigs (Triumph 4 x PIC C22; initial BW 12.3 ± 0.18 kg) allotted to 1 of 5 dietary treatments with TID SAA concentration ranging from 0.63 to 0.90%. In Exp. 2, 638 nursery pigs (Triumph 4 x PIC C22; initial BW 13.0 ± 0.16 kg) were allotted to the same 5 SAA dietary treatments as in Exp. 1. In Exp. 3, 1,232 pigs (Triumph 4 x PIC C22; initial BW 11.0 ± 0.30 kg) were allotted to 1 of 7 dietary treatments. The basal diet (diet 1) was supplemented with high concentrations of synthetic AA but no Met; this resulted in a dietary concentration of TID Lys of 1.30% and TID SAA of 0.50%. Diets 2 to 7 were the basal diet supplemented with 3 equimolar levels of HMTBA or DL-MET to provide TID SAA concentrations of 0.56, 0.62, and 0.68%, respectively. In Exp. 1, increasing TID Lys from 1.10 to 1.50% increased ADG (quadratic; P < 0.05) and improved G:F (linear; P < 0.002). The pooled data of Exp. 1 (SAA study) and Exp. 2 indicated that increasing TID SAA from 0.63 to 0.90% increased ADG (quadratic; P < 0.01) and improved G:F (quadratic; P < 0.01). Various methods of analyzing the growth response surface indicated that the optimal TID Lys concentration ranged from 1.28 to 1.32% for ADG (Exp. 1), and the optimal TID SAA concentration ranged from 0.73 to 0.77% for ADG and 0.80 to 0.83% for G:F (pooled Exp. 1 and 2), respectively. In Exp. 3, increasing TID SAA concentrations from 0.50 to 0.68% resulted in a linear improvement of ADG (P < 0.001), ADFI (P < 0.05), and G:F (P < 0.001). The best fit comparison of HMTBA and DL-MET was determined by the Schwartz Bayesian Information Criteria index, which indicated the average relative efficacy of HMTBA vs. DL-MET was 111%, with 95% confidence interval of 83 to 138%, within the range of TID SAA tested. Thus, the TID Lys and SAA requirements of modern lean-genotype pigs from 11- to 26-kg were greater than the 1998 NRC recommendations, and both HMTBA and DL-MET as Met sources can supply equimolar amounts of Met activity.

Key Words: DL-methionine • growth • 2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)butanoic acid • methionine bioefficacy • pig • sulfur amino acid




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. N. Dilger and D. H. Baker
Cyst(e)ine imbalance and its effect on methionine precursor utilization in chicks
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1832 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
S. Moehn, A. K. Shoveller, M. Rademacher, and R. O. Ball
An estimate of the methionine requirement and its variability in growing pigs using the indicator amino acid oxidation technique
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 364 - 369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
D. C. Kendall, A. M. Gaines, G. L. Allee, and J. L. Usry
Commercial validation of the true ileal digestible lysine requirement for eleven- to twenty-seven-kilogram pigs
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2008; 86(2): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. M. Hill, S. K. Baido, G. L. Cromwell, D. C. Mahan, J. L. Nelssen, H. H. Stein, and NCCC-42 Committee on Swine Nutrition
Evaluation of sex and lysine during the nursery period
J Anim Sci, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1453 - 1458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
G. F. Yi, C. A. Atwell, J. A. Hume, J. J. Dibner, C. D. Knight, and J. D. Richards
Determining the Methionine Activity of Mintrex Organic Trace Minerals in Broiler Chicks by Using Radiolabel Tracing or Growth Assay
Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 877 - 887.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.