J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2006. 84:1639-1645. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-697
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mott, T. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by MacNeil, M. D.
Right arrow Articles by Mott, T. B.

ANIMAL GENETICS

Genetic analysis of gain from birth to weaning, milk production, and udder conformation in Line 1 Hereford cattle1,2

M. D. MacNeil3 and T. B. Mott

USDA-ARS, Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301

3 Corresponding author: mike{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov

The objective of this research was to partition phenotypic variation in calf gain from birth to weaning, and milk production measured, by the weigh-suckle-weigh method, and udder score of cows into genetic and nongenetic components. Data were from the Line 1 Hereford population maintained by USDA-ARS at Miles City, MT, and included observations of pre-weaning gain (n = 6,835) from 2,172 dams, milk production (n = 692) from 403 cows, and udder score (n = 1,686) from 622 cows. Data were analyzed using a Gibbs sampler for multiple-trait animal models. Results are reported as means ± SD derived from the posterior distributions of parameter estimates. Mean estimates of the phenotypic variance of preweaning gain, milk production, and udder score were 476.3 kg2, 8.88 kg2, and 1.89 (1 to 9 scale), respectively. Estimates of phenotypic correlations between preweaning gain and milk production, preweaning gain and udder score, and milk production and udder score were 0.37 ± 0.04, – 0.07 ± 0.04, and – 0.09 ± 0.05, respectively. Estimates of heritability for direct and maternal preweaning gain, milk production, and udder score were 0.13 ± 0.03, 0.25 ± 0.04, 0.25 ± 0.06, and 0.23 ± 0.05, respectively. Genetic correlations of milk production with maternal preweaning gain and udder score were estimated as 0.80 ± 0.08 and – 0.36 ± 0.16, respectively. Posterior distributions of the other genetic correlations all contained 0.00 within the respective 90% probability density posterior intervals. Estimates of repeatability of maternal preweaning gain, milk production, and udder score were 0.43 ± 0.03, 0.39 ± 0.05, and 0.34 ± 0.03, respectively. Breeding value for maternal gain from birth to weaning was highly predictive of breeding value for milk production. Direct measurement of milk production to use in genetic improvement may not be justified because it is difficult to measure, and selection based on the breeding value for maternal preweaning gain may be nearly as effective in changing milk production as direct selection. A potentially undesirable consequence of selection to increase milk production is the degradation of udder quality. However, this correlation is not so strong as to preclude simultaneous improvement of milk production and udder quality using appropriate predicted breeding values for each trait.

Key Words: genetic correlation • growth • heritability • maternal • udder score







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.