HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rauw, W. M. Articles by Raya, L. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Rauw, W. M. Articles by Raya, L. G.

The relationship between residual feed intake and feed intake behavior in group-housed Duroc barrows¹

W. M. Rauw^*,2, J. Soler, J. Tibau, J. Reixach and L. Gomez Raya^*

^* Department of Animal Biotechnology, University of Nevada, Reno 89557; and IRTA, Centro de Control Porcino, 17121 Monells (Girona), Spain; and and Selección Batallé S.A., Riudarenes, Spain

² Corresponding author: wrauw{at}cabnr.unr.edu

Because feed is the major input in pork production, conversion of feed into lean tissue at minimum costs has been a focus for improvement. Several researchers have proposed using residual feed intake (RFI) rather than feed conversion ratio (FCR) for genetic improvement of feed efficiency. Little is known about the variation in RFI in pigs. As several studies suggest a greater RFI is related to greater animal activity levels, the current study investigated the phenotypic relationship between RFI and feed intake (FI) behavior of 104 group-housed growing Duroc barrows allowed ad libitum access to feed. Feed intake, BW gain, feeding time (TIME), feeding frequency (VISITS), RFI, and FCR were calculated for 5 periods of 14, 23, 28, 21, or 23 d in length (periods 1 through 5, respectively) on animals that were between 73 to 95 d of age at the start of the testing period. Barrows that grew faster consumed more feed (P < 0.001), and barrows that consumed more feed were fatter (P < 0.01). There were no correlations between VISITS and TIME, between VISITS and FI, or between VISITS and RFI. Barrows that spent more time at the feeder, however, consumed more feed (P < 0.05) and had greater RFI in periods 1, 3, and 5 (P < 0.05). As expected, FI and FCR were highly correlated with RFI (P < 0.001). These results suggest that a greater FI rather than greater feed intake activity resulted in greater RFI values.

Key Words: feed conversion ratio • feed intake behavior • pig • residual feed intake

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. F. Arthur, I. M. Barchia, and L. R. Giles Optimum duration of performance tests for evaluating growing pigs for growth and feed efficiency traits J Anim Sci, May 1, 2008; 86(5): 1096 - 1105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. M. Rauw, J. Soler, J. Tibau, J. Reixach, and L. Gomez Raya Feeding time and feeding rate and its relationship with feed intake, feed efficiency, growth rate, and rate of fat deposition in growing Duroc barrows J Anim Sci, December 1, 2006; 84(12): 3404 - 3409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]