J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kolath, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Keisler, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kolath, W. H.
Right arrow Articles by Keisler, D. H.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:861-865
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

The relationship between mitochondrial function and residual feed intake in Angus steers1

W. H. Kolath, M. S. Kerley2, J. W. Golden and D. H. Keisler

Division of Animal Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia 65211

2 Corresponding author: kerleym{at}missouri.edu

The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between mitochondrial function and residual feed intake in Angus steers. Individual feed intakes were recorded for a contemporary group of 40 steers via the GrowSafe feed intake system. Intakes were then used to calculate residual feed intake (RFI), a measure of efficiency. Based on these calculations, 9 low (RFI = –0.83) and 8 high (RFI = 0.78) RFI animals were selected for further study. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture 1 wk before slaughter for the determination of plasma glucose and insulin concentrations. Tissue samples were taken from the LM from both the high and low RFI animals and mitochondria were isolated for measurement of oxygen consumption and hydrogen peroxide production. Average daily gain and carcass composition were not different between the high and low RFI steers; however, ADFI by the high RFI animals was 1.54 kg/d greater (P < 0.001) than for the low RFI animals. Low RFI steers exhibited a greater (P < 0.05) rate of state 2 and 3 respiration, respiratory control ratio, and hydrogen peroxide production than high RFI steers when provided with glutamate or succinate as a respiratory substrate. The acceptor control and adenosine diphosphate:oxygen ratios were not different between the 2 groups for either substrate. When hydrogen peroxide production was expressed as a ratio to respiration rate there was no difference between groups, signifying that electron leak was similar for both groups. Plasma glucose concentration was greater (P < 0.05) in the high RFI steers than in the low RFI steers; however, plasma insulin concentration was not different (P = 0.22) between the 2 groups. The ratio between plasma glucose and insulin concentration was similar (P = 0.88) between the 2 groups indicating no difference in glucose metabolism. The increased plasma glucose concentration observed in the high RFI steers was presumed to be the result of a greater feed intake by these animals. It seems that mitochondrial function is not different between the high and low RFI groups but rather the rate of mitochondrial respiration is increased in low RFI steers compared with high RFI steers.

Key Words: feed efficiency • mitochondria • residual feed intake




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. W. Golden, M. S. Kerley, and W. H. Kolath
The relationship of feeding behavior to residual feed intake in crossbred Angus steers fed traditional and no-roughage diets
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 180 - 186.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
W. H. Kolath, M. S. Kerley, J. W. Golden, S. A. Shahid, and G. S. Johnson
The relationships among mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 and 3 expression, mitochondrial deoxyribonucleic acid single nucleotide polymorphisms, and residual feed intake in Angus steers
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2006; 84(7): 1761 - 1766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.