J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bergen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mandell, I. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bergen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Mandell, I. B.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:546-557
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL GENETICS

Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 1. Carcass lean percentage1,2

R. Bergen*, S. P. Miller*,3, J. W. Wilton*, D. H. Crews, Jr.{dagger} and I. B. Mandell*

* Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada, N1G 2W1; and and {dagger} Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, 5403-1st Avenue South, P.O. Box 3000, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada T1J 4B1

3 Corresponding author: miller{at}uoguelph.ca

We studied genetic relationships between age-constant live yearling beef bull growth and ultrasound traits and steer carcass traits with dissected steer carcass lean percentage adjusted to slaughter age-, HCW-, fat depth-, and marbling score-constant end points. Three measures of steer carcass lean percentage were used. Blue Tag lean percentage (BTLean) was predicted from HCW, fat depth, and LM area measurements. Ruler lean percentage (RulerLean) was predicted from carcass fat depth and LM depth and width measurements. Dissected lean percentage (DissLean) was based on dissection of the 10–11–12th rib section. Both BTLean (h2 = 0.30 to 0.44) and DissLean (h2 = 0.34 to 0.39) were more heritable than RulerLean (h2 = 0.05 to 0.14) at all end points. Genetic correlations among DissLean and RulerLean (rg = 0.61 to 0.70), DissLean and BTLean (rg = 0.56 to 0.72), and BTLean and RulerLean (rg = 0.59 to 0.90) indicated that these traits were not genetically identical. Adjusting Diss-Lean to different end points changed the magnitude, but generally not the direction, of genetic correlations with indicator traits. Ultrasound scan-age-constant live yearling bull lean percentage estimates were heritable (h2 = 0.26 to 0.42) and genetically correlated with each other (rg = 0.68 to 0.99) but had greater correlations with DissLean at slaughter age (rg = 0.24 to 0.48) and HCW (rg = 0.16 to 0.40) end points than at fat depth (rg = –0.08 to 0.13) and marbling score (rg = 0.02 to 0.11) end points. Scan-age-constant yearling bull ultrasound fat depth also had stronger correlations with DissLean at slaughter age (rg = –0.34) and HCW (rg = –0.25) than at fat depth (rg = –0.02) and marbling score (rg = –0.03) end points. Yearling bull scan-age-constant ultrasound LM area was positively correlated with DissLean at all endpoints (rg = 0.11 to 0.23). Genetic correlations between yearling bull LM method 1 width (rg = 0.38 to 0.56) and method 2 depth (rg = –0.17 to –0.38) measurements with DissLean suggested that LM shape may be a valuable addition to genetic improvement programs for carcass lean percentage at slaughter age, HCW, and fat depth constant end points. At all end points, steer carcass fat depth (rg = –0.60 to –0.64) and LM area (rg = 0.48 to 0.59) had stronger associations with DissLean than did corresponding live yearling bull measurements. Improved methods that combine live ultrasound and carcass traits would be beneficial for evaluating carcass lean percentage at fat depth or marbling score end points.

Key Words: cattle • end point • genetic parameter • selection • ultrasound




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. M. Rumph, W. R. Shafer, D. H. Crews Jr., R. M. Enns, R. J. Lipsey, R. L. Quaas, and E. J. Pollak
Genetic evaluation of beef carcass data using different endpoint adjustments
J Anim Sci, May 1, 2007; 85(5): 1120 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. Bergen, S. P. Miller, J. W. Wilton, and I. B. Mandell
Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 2. Carcass fat partitioning
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 558 - 566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.