J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stellflug, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stellflug, J. N.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, G. S.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:463-468
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Relationship between sexual behavior classifications of rams and lambs sired in a competitive breeding environment1,2

J. N. Stellflug3,*, N. E. Cockett{dagger} and G. S. Lewis*

* USDA-ARS, US Sheep Experiment Station, Dubois, ID 83423; and and {dagger} Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322-4700

3 Corresponding author: jstellflug{at}pw.ars.usda.gov

The objectives for this study were to 1) determine the relationship between sexual performance class and lambs sired in a competitive mating environment, and 2) determine whether the male-oriented ram test is valid. Fifteen 2- to 3-yr-old whitefaced rams classified as female-oriented, with high or low sexual performance, or classified as male-oriented were used in a multiple-sire breeding arrangement. Five groups of approximately 200 ewes each were exposed for 21 d to 3 rams per group consisting of 1 ram from each class. Rams were blocked for sexual class, and those with close genetic relationship were assigned to different pens. Genomic DNA was prepared from blood collected from 15 rams, 934 ewes, and 1,757 lambs. Up to 4 microsatellite markers were used to determine a lamb’s sire. Of 884 ewes with identifiable lambs (known sires), 178 ewes had single lambs, 408 had multiples sired by 1 ram, and 298 had multiples sired by more than 1 ram. The sexual partner preference test used to identify male-oriented rams did not absolutely reflect their sexual performance during competitive breeding. In contrast to only mounting and servicing males in preference tests before breeding, male-oriented rams sired 480 lambs from 330 ewes. Serving capacity tests predicted sexual performance of high and low sexual performance rams. High performance rams impregnated more ewes (499 vs. 258; P < 0.05) and sired more lambs (756 vs. 357; P < 0.05) than did low performance rams, respectively. Low performance and male-oriented rams did not differ for ewes impregnated or lambs sired. We conclude that 1) sexual partner preference tests used to classify male-oriented rams were not absolute in reflecting their breeding performance in a competitive breeding environment; 2) serving capacity tests predicted that high performance rams would breed more ewes than low performance rams and sire more lambs than either low performance or male-oriented rams; and 3) under the conditions of this study, low performance and male-oriented rams did not have an adverse impact on the overall breeding outcome. Combined, low performance and male-oriented rams sired 81 more lambs than did high performance rams, but this required twice as many rams to obtain approximately equal breeding results. Therefore, we suggest that serving capacity tests should be used to select high performance rams, reduce number of rams with marginal sexual performance, and make decisions on ram numbers needed.

Key Words: competitive mating • ewe lambing • lambs born • paternal typing • ram • sexual behavior




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. J. Lupton
ASAS CENTENNIAL PAPER: Impacts of animal science research on United States sheep production and predictions for the future
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3252 - 3274.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. N. Stellflug, G. S. Lewis, C. A. Moffet, and T. D. Leeds
Evaluation of three-ram cohort serving capacity tests as a substitute for individual serving capacity tests
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 2024 - 2031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.