J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waterman, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waterman, R. C.
Right arrow Articles by Petersen, M. K.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:433-446
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effects of supplements that contain increasing amounts of metabolizable protein with or without Ca-propionate salt on postpartum interval and nutrient partitioning in young beef cows1

R. C. Waterman2, J. E. Sawyer3, C. P. Mathis, D. E. Hawkins, G. B. Donart and M. K. Petersen

Department of Animal and Range Sciences, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces 88003-8003

2 Corresponding author: richard{at}larrl.ars.usda.gov

Cattle grazing winter range forages exhibit interannual variation in response to supplementation. This variation may be mediated by circulating concentrations and subsequent metabolism of glucose, which are influenced by forage quality and availability. A study conducted at the Corona Range and Livestock Research Center during 2 dry years evaluated responses of young postpartum beef cows (n = 51, initial BW = 408 ± 3 kg, and BCS = 5.1 ± 0.04 in year 1; n = 36, initial BW = 393 ± 4 kg, and BCS = 4.5 ± 0.05 in year 2) to supplements that met or exceeded metabolizable protein (MP) requirements. Supplements were fed at 908 g/d per cow and provided 327 g of CP, 118 g of ruminally undegradable protein (RUP), and 261 g of MP from RUP (RMP), calculated to meet the MP requirement; 327 g of CP, 175 g of RUP, and 292 g of MP from RUP (RMP+), which supplied 31 g of excess MP; or 327 g of CP, 180 g of RUP, 297 g of MP from RUP, and 100 g of propionate salt (NutroCal, Kemin Industries, Inc., Des Moines, IA; RMP+P), which supplied 36 g of excess MP. Body weights were recorded once every 2 wk, and blood samples were collected 1x/wk in year 1 and 2x/wk in year 2 for 100 d postpartum. Postpartum anestrous was evaluated by progesterone from weekly blood samples, and pregnancy was confirmed by rectal palpation at weaning. As MP from RUP with or without propionate increased, a decrease (P = 0.03) was observed in postpartum interval; however, differences in pregnancy percentage (P = 0.54) were not influenced by treatments. We hypothesized that additional AA from RUP along with propionate would increase supply of glucogenic precursors and, therefore, glucogenic potential of the diet. Therefore, a postpartum glucose tolerance test was conducted near the nadir of cow BW to evaluate the rate of glucose clearance. Glucose tolerance tests showed that RMP+- or RMP+P-supplemented cows had greater (P = 0.03) rates of glucose clearance, which might have influenced the observed abbreviation of the postpartum interval. A glucose tolerance test conducted at the end of supplemental treatments revealed no differences in glucose clearance (P = 0.47) among previously supplemented cows. These data suggest that not only vegetative quality, duration of lactation, and season of grazing, but also type of supplementation may play a pivotal role in the young postpartum beef cow’s ability to respond and incorporate nutrients into insulin-sensitive tissues.

Key Words: beef cow • glucose tolerance • insulin sensitivity • propionate • protein supplementation • reproduction




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
C. L. Engel, H. H. Patterson, and G. A. Perry
Effect of dried corn distillers grains plus solubles compared with soybean hulls, in late gestation heifer diets, on animal and reproductive performance
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2008; 86(7): 1697 - 1708.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. C. Waterman, E. E. Grings, T. W. Geary, A. J. Roberts, L. J. Alexander, and M. D. MacNeil
Influence of seasonal forage quality on glucose kinetics of young beef cows
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2007; 85(10): 2582 - 2595.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. D. Rhoades, J. E. Sawyer, K. Y. Chung, M. L. Schell, D. K. Lunt, and S. B. Smith
Effect of dietary energy source on in vitro substrate utilization and insulin sensitivity of muscle and adipose tissues of Angus and Wagyu steers
J Anim Sci, July 1, 2007; 85(7): 1719 - 1726.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.