J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Roth, F. X.
Right arrow Articles by Ettle, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Roth, F. X.
Right arrow Articles by Ettle, T.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:379-386
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

ANIMAL NUTRITION

Evidence of a dietary selection for methionine by the piglet1

F. X. Roth2, C. Meindl and T. Ettle

Department of Animal Sciences, Division of Animal Nutrition and Production Physiology, Technical University of Munich-Weihenstephan, 85350, Germany

2 Corresponding author: roth_fx{at}wzw.tum.de

The objective of the current study was to investigate if there is a preference of piglets for diets varying in Met content and whether these preferences change with time. For this purpose, a feeding trial was carried out over a period of 6 wk. Piglets (equal numbers of males and females) with an initial BW of 7.2 ± 0.1 kg were randomly subdivided into 4 groups of 12 pigs each. Two reference groups were fed either 0.19% Met (low-Met group) or 0.26% Met (high-Met group) diets. Two other groups had the choice between 2 diets containing 0.19 or 0.23% Met (Met-choice 1 group), or 0.19 or 0.26% Met (Met-choice 2 group). Compared with the low-Met group (397 g), daily feed intake was increased by 43%, 60%, and 82% (P < 0.05) in the Met-choice 1, Met-choice 2, and the high-Met group, respectively. Piglets on the Met-choice 1 and Met-choice 2 groups, respectively, selected 72 and 80% of the higher Met diet. In the first week, piglets on both Met-choice groups selected the diets at random, but they increased their preference for the diets higher in Met up to 81 and 89%, respectively, in the last experimental week. For the total experiment, mean Met contents of total diets were 0.22 and 0.25% in the Met-choice 1 and Met-choice 2 groups, respectively. Average daily gain of 195 g in the low-Met group was more than doubled (P < 0.05) in the high-Met group. Daily gains of 306 and 366 g in the Met-choice 1 and 2 groups, respectively, were (P < 0.05) improved compared with the low-Met group but lower (P < 0.05) than in the high-Met group. Plasma Met concentration of 46.3 µmol/mL in the Met-choice 2 group was greater than in the low-Met or the Met-choice 1 groups (25.3 and 32.8 µmol/mL, respectively) but lower (P < 0.05) compared with the high-Met group (59.6 µmol/mL). Conversely, the sum of essential AA showed a greater (P < 0.05) concentration in plasma from pigs on the low-Met and Met-choice 1 groups than in plasma from pigs on Met-choice 2 group and the high-Met group. In conclusion, the present data demonstrate that piglets are able to discriminate among diets of varying Met content. When given a choice, they prefer a diet better balanced for Met to a Met-deficient diet. As a result of the altered feeding pattern, piglets are able to partly redress the depressed performance and altered plasma AA pattern resulting from the ingestion of the diet more limiting in Met concentration.

Key Words: feeding preference • methionine • piglet






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.