J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gourdine, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Renaudeau, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gourdine, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Renaudeau, D.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:360-369
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL NUTRITION

Effects of breed and season on performance of lactating sows in a tropical humid climate1

J. L. Gourdine*, J. P. Bidanel{dagger}, J. Noblet{ddagger} and D. Renaudeau*,2

* Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Station de Recherches Zootechniques, 97170 Petit Bourg, Guadeloupe, F.W.I, France; and {dagger} Station de Génétique Quantitative et Appliquée, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France; and and {ddagger} UMR Systèmes d’Elevage, Nutrition Animale et Humaine, 35590 St-Gilles, France

2 Corresponding author: renaudeau{at}antilles.inra.fr

A total of 179 lactations obtained on 71 multiparous sows [30 Creole (CR) and 41 Large White (LW)] between June 2001 and July 2004 were used to determine effects of breed (CR vs. LW) and season (hot vs. warm) in a tropical humid climate on performance during a 28-d lactation period. Mean daily ambient temperature was greater during the hot season than during the warm season (26.0 vs. 23.8°C), and relative humidity was similar in both seasons (85% on average). For both breeds, ADFI was reduced (–700 g/d, P < 0.01), sow BW loss was greater (17 vs. 12 kg, P < 0.01), and piglet growth was reduced (197 vs. 210 g/d, P < 0.05) during the hot vs. the warm season. At farrowing, LW sows were heavier (255 vs. 186 kg, P < 0.01) and had less backfat (21 vs. 40 mm, P < 0.01) than CR sows. The growth rate of CR piglets was lower than that of LW piglets (192 vs. 215 g/d, P < 0.01). A breed x season interaction was observed (P < 0.05) for ADFI and sow BW loss. During the hot season, the reduction of ADFI was more pronounced in LW than in CR sows (–910 vs. –470 g/d). Regardless of the season, BW loss of CR sows remained constant (14.2 kg), whereas it increased during the hot season for LW sows (10 kg). The weaning-to-estrus and the weaning-to-conception intervals were not affected by breed or season and averaged 4.8 and 6.1 d, respectively. The rectal temperature was greater (0.3°C) during the hot season than during the warm season and greater in LW than in CR sows (39.1 vs. 38.8°C, P < 0.10). This study confirms the negative effect of hot season in a tropical humid climate on performance of lactating sows and that breed can have a significant effect on lactation performance. The results also suggest that CR sows are more heat tolerant than LW sows.

Key Words: breed • feed intake • lactation • performance • sow • tropical climate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. L. Gourdine, J. P. Bidanel, J. Noblet, and D. Renaudeau
Effects of season and breed on the feeding behavior of multiparous lactating sows in a tropical humid climate
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2006; 84(2): 469 - 480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.