| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
, and progesterone1
,2
* North Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids 55744;
and
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-0201;
and
Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43201;
and
USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301;
and
# Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801;
and
|| Select Sires, Inc., Plain City, OH, 43064;
and
¶ Department of Animal Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996;
and
** Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul 55108; and
and
Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette 47907
2 Corresponding author: clamb{at}umn.edu
We determined whether a fixed-time AI (TAI) protocol could yield pregnancy rates similar to a protocol requiring detection of estrus, or estrous detection plus TAI, and whether adding a controlled internal device release (CIDR) to GnRH-based protocols would enhance fertility. Estrus was synchronized in 2,598 suckled beef cows at 14 locations, and AI was preceded by 1 of 5 treatments: 1) a CIDR for 7 d with 25 mg of PG F2
(PGF) at CIDR removal, followed by detection of estrus and AI during the 84 h after PGF; cows not detected in estrus by 84 h received 100 µg of GnRH and TAI at 84 h (control; n = 506); 2) GnRH administration, followed in 7 d with PGF, followed in 60 h by a second injection of GnRH and TAI (CO-Synch; n = 548); 3) CO-Synch plus a CIDR during the 7 d between the first injection of GnRH and PGF (CO-Synch + CIDR; n = 539); 4) GnRH administration, followed in 7 d with PGF, followed by detection of estrus and AI during the 84 h after PGF; cows not detected in estrus by 84 h received GnRH and TAI at 84 h (Select Synch & TAI; n = 507); and 5) Select Synch & TAI plus a CIDR during the 7 d between the first injection of GnRH and PGF (Select Synch + CIDR & TAI; n = 498). Blood samples were collected (d –17 and –7, relative to PGF) to determine estrous cycle status. For the control, Select Synch & TAI, and Select Synch + CIDR & TAI treatments, a minimum of twice daily observations for estrus began on d 0 and continued for at least 72 h. Inseminations were performed using the AM/PM rule. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography. Percentage of cows cycling at the initiation of treatments was 66%. Pregnancy rates (proportion of cows pregnant to AI of all cows synchronized during the synchronization period) among locations across treatments ranged from 37% to 67%. Pregnancy rates were greater (P < 0.05) for the Select Synch + CIDR & TAI (58%), CO-Synch + CIDR (54%), Select Synch & TAI (53%), or control (53%) treatments than the CO-Synch (44%) treatment. Among the 3 protocols in which estrus was detected, conception rates (proportion of cows that became pregnant to AI of those exhibiting estrus during the synchronization period) were greater (P < 0.05) for Select Synch & TAI (70%; 217 of 309) and Select Synch + CIDR & TAI (67%; 230 of 345) cows than for control cows (61%; 197 of 325). We conclude that the CO-Synch + CIDR protocol yielded similar pregnancy rates to estrous detection protocols and is a reliable TAI protocol that eliminates detection of estrus when inseminating beef cows.
Key Words: beef cow • synchronization • timed artificial insemination
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. A. Mallory, D. J. Wilson, M. C. Lucy, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1808 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Atkins, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. H. Keisler, D. J. Patterson, M. C. Lucy, and M. F. Smith Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: Effect of day of the cycle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. J. Schafer, J. F. Bader, J. P. Meyer, J. K. Haden, M. R. Ellersieck, M. C. Lucy, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1940 - 1945. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. C. Lamb, J. E. Larson, T. W. Geary, J. S. Stevenson, S. K. Johnson, M. L. Day, R. P. Ansotegui, D. J. Kesler, J. M. DeJarnette, and D. G. Landblom Synchronization of estrus and artificial insemination in replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone, prostaglandin F2{alpha}, and progesterone J Anim Sci, November 1, 2006; 84(11): 3000 - 3009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Stevenson, J. R. Pursley, H. A. Garverick, P. M. Fricke, D. J. Kesler, J. S. Ottobre, and M. C. Wiltbank Treatment of cycling and noncycling lactating dairy cows with progesterone during Ovsynch. J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2006; 89(7): 2567 - 2578. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
