J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Foxcroft, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vinsky, M. D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Foxcroft, G. R.
Right arrow Articles by Vinsky, M. D. A.
J. Anim. Sci. 2006. 84:E105-E112
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

The biological basis for prenatal programming of postnatal performance in pigs1,2

G. R. Foxcroft3, W. T. Dixon, S. Novak, C. T. Putman, S. C. Town and M. D. A. Vinsky

Swine Reproduction-Development Program, Swine Research & Technology Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2P5, Canada

3 Corresponding author: george.foxcroft{at}ualberta.ca

The main purpose of this review is to discuss associations between within-litter variation in birth weight, and preweaning survival and postnatal growth in the pig, as the basis for suggesting that the developmental competence of pigs born, as well as the size of the litter, need critical consideration. Extremes of intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) occur within a discrete subset of fetuses, substantially smaller than their littermates and commonly described as runt piglets. The lower preweaning growth of runt pigs cannot be entirely explained based on their lower birth weight, nor do they show full postnatal compensatory growth. Interestingly, this more complex reprogramming of development in runt pigs can already be identified by d 27 to 35 of gestation. Recently, we reported more universal IUGR effects in commercial dam-line sows, as an indirect response to selection for increased litter size. High ovulation rates (>30 ovulations) in a proportion of greater parity sows are associated with increased numbers of conceptuses surviving to d 30 of gestation, resulting in detrimental effects on placental development of uterine crowding in the early postimplantation period. In turn, this limits nutrient availability to the embryo during a critical period of myogenesis. Consequently, although a reduction in the number of conceptuses occurs by d 50, placental development in the surviving fetuses remains compromised, resulting in IUGR and reduced numbers of muscle fibers at d 90 and at birth, in all surviving littermates. These effects of uterine crowding on fetal and postnatal development are analogous to the detrimental effects of nutritional restriction in gestating sows on fetal myogenesis, birth weight, and postnatal growth. The incompatibility between increased numbers of conceptuses surviving to the postimplantation period, in the absence of increased uterine capacity, offers a biological explanation for increased variability in birth weight and postnatal growth performance reported in greater parity sows. We conclude that a strategy of introducing hyperprolific females into the breeding nucleus, as a means of increasing the numbers of pigs born, needs to be critically evaluated in the context of the overall efficiency of pork production.

Key Words: fetus • intrauterine growth retardation • postnatal growth • prenatal programming • swine




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
A. P. Schinckel, B. T. Richert, D. M. Sholly, J. S. Radcliffe, A. L. Sutton, and M. E. Einstein
Impact of Weaning Weight and Early Postweaning Growth of Pigs to Late Finishing Growth When Fed Either Corn- and Soybean Meal-Based Diets or Low Nutrient Excretion Nutrient-Dense Diets
Professional Animal Scientist, April 1, 2009; 25(2): 175 - 188.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
A. Cerisuelo, M. D. Baucells, J. Gasa, J. Coma, D. Carrion, N. Chapinal, and R. Sala
Increased sow nutrition during midgestation affects muscle fiber development and meat quality, with no consequences on growth performance
J Anim Sci, February 1, 2009; 87(2): 729 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Patterson, A. Wellen, M. Hahn, A. Pasternak, J. Lowe, S. DeHaas, D. Kraus, N. Williams, and G. Foxcroft
Responses to delayed estrus after weaning in sows using oral progestagen treatment
J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1996 - 2004.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
B. A. Freking, K. A. Leymaster, J. L. Vallet, and R. K. Christenson
Number of fetuses and conceptus growth throughout gestation in lines of pigs selected for ovulation rate or uterine capacity
J Anim Sci, September 1, 2007; 85(9): 2093 - 2103.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.