| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
ANIMAL GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND REPRODUCTION |
, and progesterone1
* North Central Research and Outreach Center, University of Minnesota, Grand Rapids 55744;
and
USDA-ARS Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT 59301;
and
Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-0201;
and
Department of Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus 43201;
and
# Department of Animal and Range Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717;
and
|| Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801;
and
¶ Select Sires Inc., Plain City, OH 43064; and
and
** Department of Animal and Range Sciences, North Dakota State University, Dickinson 58601
2 Corresponding author: clamb{at}umn.edu
We evaluated whether a fixed-time AI (TAI) protocol could yield pregnancy rates similar to a protocol requiring detection of estrus, or detection of estrus and AI plus a clean-up TAI for heifers not detected in estrus, and whether adding an injection of GnRH at controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insertion would enhance fertility in CIDR-based protocols. Estrus in 2,075 replacement beef heifers at 12 locations was synchronized, and AI was preceded by 1 of 4 treatments arranged as a 2 x 2 factorial design: 1) Estrus detection + TAI (ETAI) (n = 516): CIDR for 7 d plus 25 mg of prostaglandin F2
(PG) at CIDR insert removal, followed by detection of estrus for 72 h and AI for 84 h after PG (heifers not detected in estrus by 84 h received 100 µg of GnRH and TAI); 2) G+ETAI (n = 503): ETAI plus 100 µg GnRH at CIDR insertion; 3) Fixed-time AI (FTAI) (n = 525): CIDR for 7 d plus 25 mg of PG at CIDR removal, followed in 60 h by a second injection of GnRH and TAI; 4) G+FTAI (n = 531): FTAI plus 100 µg of GnRH at CIDR insertion. Blood samples were collected (d –17 and –7, relative to PG) to determine ovarian status. For heifers in ETAI and G+ETAI treatments, a minimum of twice daily observations for estrus began on d 0 and continued for at least 72 h. Inseminations were performed according to the a.m.-p.m. rule. Pregnancy was diagnosed by transrectal ultrasonography. The percentage of heifers exhibiting ovarian cyclic activity at the initiation of treatments was 89%. Pregnancy rates among locations across treatments ranged from 38 to 74%. Pregnancy rates were 54.7, 57.5, 49.3, and 53.1% for ETAI, G+ETAI, FTAI, and G+FTAI treatments, respectively. Although pregnancy rates were similar among treatments, a tendency (P = 0.065) occurred for pregnancy rates in the G+ETAI treatment to be greater than in the FTAI treatment. We concluded that the G+FTAI protocol yielded pregnancy rates similar to protocols that combine estrus detection and TAI. Further, the G+FTAI protocol produced the most consistent pregnancy rates among locations and eliminated the necessity for detection of estrus when inseminating replacement beef heifers.
Key Words: beef heifer • synchronization • timed artificial insemination
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  M. P. Goravanahally, M. Salem, J. Yao, E. K. Inskeep, and J. A. Flores Differential Gene Expression in the Bovine Corpus Luteum During Transition from Early Phase to Midphase and Its Potential Role in Acquisition of Luteolytic Sensitivity to Prostaglandin F2 Alpha Biol Reprod, May 1, 2009; 80(5): 980 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. K. Johnson and R. D. Jones A Stochastic Model to Compare Breeding System Costs for Synchronization of Estrus and Artificial Insemination to Natural Service Professional Animal Scientist, December 1, 2008; 24(6): 588 - 595. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. S. Stevenson Progesterone, Follicular, and Estrual Responses to Progesterone-Based Estrus and Ovulation Synchronization Protocols at Five Stages of the Estrous Cycle J Dairy Sci, December 1, 2008; 91(12): 4640 - 4650. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. R. Leitman, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. A. Mallory, D. J. Wilson, M. C. Lucy, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Comparison of protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation in estrous-cycling and prepubertal beef heifers J Anim Sci, August 1, 2008; 86(8): 1808 - 1818. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Atkins, D. C. Busch, J. F. Bader, D. H. Keisler, D. J. Patterson, M. C. Lucy, and M. F. Smith Gonadotropin-releasing hormone-induced ovulation and luteinizing hormone release in beef heifers: Effect of day of the cycle J Anim Sci, January 1, 2008; 86(1): 83 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. C. Busch, D. J. Wilson, D. J. Schafer, N. R. Leitman, J. K. Haden, M. R. Ellersieck, M. F. Smith, and D. J. Patterson Comparison of progestin-based estrus synchronization protocols before fixed-time artificial insemination on pregnancy rate in beef heifers J Anim Sci, August 1, 2007; 85(8): 1933 - 1939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. M. McDonald and M. K. Nielsen Renewed selection for heat loss in mice: Direct responses and correlated responses in feed intake, body weight, litter size, and conception rate J Anim Sci, March 1, 2007; 85(3): 658 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
