J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


J. Anim Sci. 2006. 84:2856-2864. doi:10.2527/jas.2005-577
© 2006 American Society of Animal Science

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolter, B. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ritter, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolter, B. F.

ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Effect of floor space during transport of market-weight pigs on the incidence of transport losses at the packing plant and the relationships between transport conditions and losses1

M. J. Ritter*, M. Ellis*,2, J. Brinkmann{dagger}, J. M. DeDecker*, K. K. Keffaber{ddagger}, M. E. Kocher*,3, B. A. Peterson*, J. M. Schlipf* and B. F. Wolter{dagger}

* Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801; and {dagger} The Maschhoffs Inc., Carlyle, IL 62231; and and {ddagger} Elanco Animal Health, Greenfield, IN 46140

2 Corresponding author: mellis7{at}uiuc.edu

Data on 74 trailer loads of finishing pigs (mean BW = 129.0, SEM = 0.63 kg) from wean-to-finish buildings on 2 farms within 1 production system were collected to investigate the effect of amount of floor space on the trailer (0.39 or 0.48 m2/pig) during transport on the incidence of losses (dead and nonambulatory pigs) at the packing plant and to study the relationships between transport conditions and losses. Pigs were loaded using standard commercial procedures for pig handling and transportation. Two designs of flat-deck trailers with 2 decks were used. Floor space treatments were compared in 2 similarly sized compartments on each deck of each trailer type. Differences in floor space were created by varying the number of pigs in each compartment. The incidence of nonambulatory pigs at the farm during loading and at the plant after unloading, average load weight, load number within each day, event times, and temperature and relative humidity in the trailer from loading to unloading were recorded. Of the 12,511 pigs transported, 0.26% were non-ambulatory at the farm, 0.23% were dead on arrival, and 0.85% were nonambulatory at the plant. Increasing transport floor space from 0.39 to 0.48 m2/pig reduced the percentage of total nonambulatory pigs (0.62 vs. 0.27 ± 0.13%, respectively; P < 0.05), nonambulatory, noninjured pigs (0.52 vs. 0.15 ± 0.11%, respectively; P < 0.01), and total losses (dead and nonambulatory pigs) at the plant (0.88 vs. 0.36 ± 0.16%, respectively; P < 0.05) and tended to reduce dead pigs (0.27 vs. 0.08 ± 0.08%, respectively; P = 0.06). However, transport floor space did not affect the percentage of nonambulatory, injured pigs at the plant. Nonambulatory pigs at the farm were positively correlated with relative humidity during loading and load number within the day (r = 0.46 and 0.25, respectively; P < 0.05). The percentage of total losses at the plant was positively correlated to waiting time at the plant, unloading time, and total time from loading to unloading (r = 0.24, 0.51, and 0.36, respectively; P < 0.05). Average temperature during loading, waiting at the farm, transport, waiting at the plant, unloading, and average pig weight on the trailer were not correlated to losses. These results suggest that floor space per pig on the trailer and transport conditions can affect transport losses.

Key Words: floor space • nonambulatory • pig • transport • welfare




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
M. J. Ritter, M. Ellis, N. L. Berry, S. E. Curtis, L. Anil, E. Berg, M. Benjamin, D. Butler, C. Dewey, B. Driessen, et al.
Review: Transport Losses in Market Weight Pigs: I. A Review of Definitions, Incidence, and Economic Impact
Professional Animal Scientist, August 1, 2009; 25(4): 404 - 414.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
R. F. Fitzgerald, K. J. Stalder, J. O. Matthews, C. M. Schultz Kaster, and A. K. Johnson
Factors associated with fatigued, injured, and dead pig frequency during transport and lairage at a commercial abattoir
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2009; 87(3): 1156 - 1166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Ritter, M. Ellis, D. B. Anderson, S. E. Curtis, K. K. Keffaber, J. Killefer, F. K. McKeith, C. M. Murphy, and B. A. Peterson
Effects of multiple concurrent stressors on rectal temperature, blood acid-base status, and longissimus muscle glycolytic potential in market-weight pigs
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2009; 87(1): 351 - 362.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Ritter, M. Ellis, R. Bowman, J. Brinkmann, S. E. Curtis, J. M. DeDecker, O. Mendoza, C. M. Murphy, D. G. Orellana, B. A. Peterson, et al.
Effects of season and distance moved during loading on transport losses of market-weight pigs in two commercially available types of trailer
J Anim Sci, November 1, 2008; 86(11): 3137 - 3145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
M. J. Ritter, M. Ellis, C. R. Bertelsen, R. Bowman, J. Brinkmann, J. M. DeDecker, K. K. Keffaber, C. M. Murphy, B. A. Peterson, J. M. Schlipf, et al.
Effects of distance moved during loading and floor space on the trailer during transport on losses of market weight pigs on arrival at the packing plant
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2007; 85(12): 3454 - 3461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Animal Science.