J. Anim Sci.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arthington, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arthington, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, W. F.
J. Anim. Sci. 2005. 83:1726-1731
© 2005 American Society of Animal Science


ANIMAL PRODUCTION

Estimation of feeding value of four tropical forage species at two stages of maturity1,2

J. D. Arthington3 and W. F. Brown4

University of Florida-IFAS, Range Cattle Research and Education Center, Ona 33865

3 Correspondence: 3401 Experiment Stn. (phone: 863-735-1314; fax: 863-735-1930; e-mail: jdarthington{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu).

The feeding value of four tropical grasses was assessed through voluntary intake and digestibility studies using yearling Brahman x British steers (average BW = 256 ± 34 kg). The digestibility of OM was estimated using total fecal collection (TFC), in vitro OM digestibility (IVOMD), and by estimating fecal production using insoluble acid detergent fiber (IADF) as an indigestible marker. The four grasses consisted of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum), limpograss (Hemarthria altissima), bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon), and stargrass (Cynodon spp.). Grass was harvested at two stages of maturity (approximately 4 and 10 wk). Forages were ground (5 to 10 cm) and offered to steers ad libitum. Forage treatments were assigned randomly to steers over eight 28-d periods and repeated over two consecutive years. Total forage offered and refused was determined during a 14-d sample collection period. For determination of fecal output, steers were placed into metabolism crates for 7 d. Composited samples of forage offered, forage refused, and feces of each steer at each period were analyzed for DM, OM, NDF, ADF, IADF, IVOMD, and CP. All digestibility results were calculated on an OM basis. There were year x grass x maturity interactions (P < 0.01) for all measures of forage quality, except CP. Increased maturity resulted in a 37.8% decrease (P < 0.001) in CP concentration when averaged across all forages. Four-week bermudagrass contained the greatest (P < 0.05) concentration of CP compared with all other grasses at both maturities, except 4-wk stargrass. Bahiagrass IVOMD did not differ among 4- and 10-wk maturities in both years; however, the IVOMD content of both stargrass and bermudagrass decreased (P < 0.05) when these forages matured from 4 to 10 wk. Apparent OM digestibility, determined by TFC, was greater (P < 0.05) than OM digestibility determined by IVOMD and IADF for all forages except bahiagrass, for which IADF did not differ from TFC. In Year 1, OM intake (OMI) of 10-wk limpograss was less (P < 0.05) than all other 4-wk forages. In Year 2, voluntary OMI of 10-wk limpograss was less (P < 0.05) than all grass x maturity combinations, except for 10-wk bermudagrass. These data suggest that important differences exist in changes in nutrient quality associated with increased maturity in tropical forages. Among the forages assessed in this study, bahiagrass seems to better retain nutrient quality when maturing from 4 to 10 wk.

Key Words: Bahiagrass • Bermudagrass • Insoluble Acid Detergent Fiber • Limpograss • Stargrass




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Professional Animal ScientistHome page
P. Ricci, A. J. Romera, J. C. Burges, H. H. Fernandez, and C. A. Cangiano
Case Study: Precision and Accuracy of Methodologies for Estimating In Vitro Digestibility of Thinopyrum ponticum (Tall Wheatgrass) Hay and Haylage Fed to Beef Cattle
Professional Animal Scientist, October 1, 2009; 25(5): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
L. O. Tedeschi and D. G. Fox
Predicting milk and forage intake of nursing calves
J Anim Sci, October 1, 2009; 87(10): 3380 - 3391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo, D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, D. L. Hartzog, K. B. Balkcom, P. P. Wiatrak, and J. R. Rich
Performance of Peanut and Cotton in a Bahiagrass Cropping System
Agron. J., August 10, 2007; 99(5): 1245 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. T. MacKown, J. J. Heitholt, and S. C. Rao
Agronomic Feasibility of a Continuous Double Crop of Winter Wheat and Soybean Forage in the Southern Great Plains
Crop Sci., July 30, 2007; 47(4): 1652 - 1660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. C. Burns and D. S. Fisher
Dry Matter Intake and Digestibility of 'Coastal', 'Tifton 44', and 'Tifton 85' Bermudagrass Hays Grown in the U.S. Upper South
Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 795 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Society of Animal Science.