HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Supplemental Figure Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kim, J.-J. Articles by Dekkers, J. C. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kim, J.-J. Articles by Dekkers, J. C. M.

Joint analysis of two breed cross populations in pigs to improve detection and characterization of quantitative trait loci¹

J.-J. Kim^*,2, M. F. Rothschild^*, J. Beever, S. Rodriguez-Zas and J. C. M. Dekkers^*,3

^* Department of Animal Science, Center for Integrated Animal Genomics, Iowa State University, Ames 50011; and and Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana 61801

³ Correspondence: 239 Kildee Hall (phone: 515-294-7509; fax: 515-294-9150; e-mail: jdekkers{at}iastate.edu).

The purpose of this study was to develop and implement least squares interval-mapping models for joint analysis of breed cross QTL mapping populations and to evaluate the effect of joint analysis on QTL detected for economic traits in data from two breed crosses in pigs. Data on 26 growth, carcass composition, and meat quality traits from F₂ crosses between commercially relevant pig breeds were used: a Berkshire x Yorkshire cross at Iowa State University (ISU) and a Berkshire x Duroc cross at the University of Illinois (UOI). All animals were genotyped for a total of 39 (ISU) and 32 (UOI) markers on chromosomes 2, 6, 13, and 18. Marker linkage maps derived from the individual and joint data were similar with regard to order and relative position, but some differences in absolute distances existed. Maps from the joint data were used in all analyses. The individual and joint data sets were analyzed using several least squares interval-mapping models: line-cross (LC) models with Mendelian and parent-of-origin effects; halfsib models (HS); and combined models (CB) that included LC and HS effects. Lack-of-fit tests between the models were used to characterize QTL for mode of expression and to identify segregation of QTL within parental breeds. A total of 26 (8), 47 (18), and 53 (16) QTL were detected at the 5% chromosome (genome)-wise level in the ISU, UOI, and joint data for the 26 analyzed traits. Of the 53 QTL detected in the joint data, only six were detected in both populations and for many, allele effects differed between the two crosses. Despite the lack of overlap between the two populations, joint analysis resulted in an increase in significance for many QTL, including detection of ten QTL that did not reach significance in either population. Confidence intervals for position also were smaller for several QTL. In contrast, 24 QTL, most of which were detected at chromosome-wise levels in the ISU or UOI population, were not detected in the joint data. Presence of paternally expressed QTL near the IGF2 region of SSC2 was confirmed, with major effects on backfat and loin muscle area, particularly in the UOI population, as well as one or more QTL for carcass composition in the distal arm of Chromosome 6. Results of this study suggest that joint analysis using a range of QTL models increases the power of QTL mapping and QTL characterization, which helps to identify genes for subsequent marker-assisted selection.

Key Words: Imprinting • Joint Analysis • Quantitative Trait Loci • Swine

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Perez-Enciso, A. Mercade, J. P. Bidanel, H. Geldermann, S. Cepica, H. Bartenschlager, L. Varona, D. Milan, and J. M. Folch Large-scale, multibreed, multitrait analyses of quantitative trait loci experiments: The case of porcine X chromosome J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2289 - 2296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]